Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

When mind, heart, and hands meet: communication design and designers

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hong Kong’s transformation from a manufacturing to a knowledge-based economy has prompted the local government to promote the city as a regional design center. The 2008 Policy Address delivered by Hong Kong’s Chief Executive calls for the creation of a large pool of creative and knowledgeable talent. The government recognizes that, in addition to disciplinary knowledge and skills, the high-quality workforce demanded by the economic transition requires creativity and broader competences. The University Grants Committee of Hong Kong considers outcome-based education (OBE) the best approach to developing a workforce qualified to meet the demands of the professional marketplace and, accordingly, is strongly encouraging its deployment in all higher education institutions. This article investigates the effects of the OBE approach on the curriculum revision, implementation, and evaluation of a two-semester undergraduate-level communication design course that was selected for an OBE pilot study at the author’s university. To establish stronger linkage between the academic and professional contexts, it was deemed necessary to seek the opinions of experienced design practitioners about the attributes they expect of graduates and the methods they employ in training junior designers. The author conducted in-depth interviews with 13 art/creative directors from 11 design agencies in Hong Kong in 2007. Their opinions were incorporated into the formulation of intended learning outcomes (ILOs), teaching and learning activities (TLAs), and assessment tasks (ATs) for the revised outcome-based course curriculum, which was then implemented in the 2008–2009 academic year. This article reports the findings of the aforementioned interviews and discusses the design of the revised curriculum with illustration from samples of students’ creative projects. It also provides a preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of the course design and student learning, as revealed in quantitative and qualitative feedback from students and in the course designer’s self-reflection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bevlin, M. E. (1984). Design through discovery. New York: Holt Rinehart Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresciani, M. J. (2006). Outcomes-based academic and co-curricular program review: A compilation of institutional good practices. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. R., Rangaswamy, A., Wind, J., & Eliashberg, J. (1990). A knowledge-based system for advertising design. Marketing Science, 9(3), 212–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M., Anson, C. M., & Miller, C. R. (2003). Assessing technical writing in institutional contexts: Using outcomes-based assessment for programmatic thinking. Technical Communication Quarterly, 12(1), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (1998). Creative industries mapping document 1998. Retrieved from http://www.culture.gov.uk/reference_library/publications/4740.aspx.

  • Ewell, P. T. (2001). Accreditation and student learning outcomes: A proposed point of departure [Council for Higher Education Accreditation occasional paper]. Retrieved from http://www.chea.org/pdf/EwellSLO_Sept2001.pdf.

  • Furman, G. C. (1995). Administrators’ perceptions of outcome-based education: A case study. International Journal of Educational Management, 9(6), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Medical Council. (1993). Tomorrow’s doctors: Recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, G. (1999). Design. In M. A. Runco & M. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 525–535). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harden, R. M., Crosby, J. R., & Davis, M. H. (1999). AMEE guide no. 14: Outcome-based education: Part 1—An introduction to outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harden, R. M., & Davis, M. H. (1995). The core curriculum with options or special study modules. Medical Teacher, 18, 125–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, S. (2005). Too many grads or too few competencies? The design school dilemma. Retrieved from http://www.aiga.org/content.cfm/too-many-grads-or-too-few-competencies-the-design-school-dilemma.

  • Hong Kong Government Chief Executive’s Policy Address (2008). The 2007-08 policy address: A new direction for Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/07-08/eng/docs/policy.pdf.

  • Hong Kong Trade Development Council (2002). Economic forum: Creative industries in Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://info.hktdc.com/econforum/tdc/tdc020902.htm.

  • Hubel, V., & Lussow, D. B. (1984). Focus on designing. New York: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (2006). Letter to the president of City University of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think: The design process demystified. Burlington, MA: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinster, S. (2002). Medical education and the changing face of health care delivery. Medical Teacher, 24, 13–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C. D. (2006). Circles of practice: Educational and professional graphic design. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(6), 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, B. (2004). Using learning outcomes in design education. Proceedings of designing for the 21st century III: An international conference on universal design. Retrieved from http://www.designfor21st.org/proceedings/proceedings/wg_long.html.

  • Margolin, V., & Buchanan, R. (1995). The idea of design: A design issues reader. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson, B. (2006). A culture of creativity: Design education and the creative industries. The Journal of Management Development, 25(1), 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. S., & Smock, S. A. (2005). Challenges of an outcome-based perspective for marriage and family therapy education. Family Process, 44(3), 355–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman Demirbaş, Ö., & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design education. Learning and Instruction, 17, 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson Davenport, L. A., Davey, P. G., & Ker, J. S. (2005). An outcome-based approach for teaching prudent antimicrobial prescribing to undergraduate medical students: Report of a working party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 56, 196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2008). Subject benchmark statement—Art and design 2008. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/benchmark/statements/ADHA08.pdf.

  • Rowe, P. G. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, R. A., & Straits, B. C. (2005). Approaches to social research. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. R., & Dollase, R. (1999). Planning, implementing and evaluating a competency-based curriculum. Medical Teacher, 21, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2004). Creative industries and development. United Nations conference on trade and development: Creative industries and development. Retrieved from http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/tdxibpd13_en.pdf.

  • University Grants Committee. (2008). Symposium on outcome-based approaches in student learning. Quality education, quality outcomes: The way forward for Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/oba.htm.

  • Vande Zande, R. (2007). Design, form, and function in art education. Art Education, 60(4), 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanadhan, K. G. (2006). Quality assessment of Indian engineering programs: An outcome-based perspective. South Asian Journal of Management, 13(3), 76–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, D. (2005). Cramming conceptual abilities into design curricula. Retrieved from http://www.aiga.org/content.cfm/cramming-conceptual-abilities-into-design-curricula.

  • Zeisel, J. (1981). Inquiry by design: Tools for environment-behaviour research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zundel, P. E., & Needham, T. D. (2000). Outcomes-based forestry education: An application in New Brunswick. Journal of Forestry, 98(2), 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Media and Communication, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    Ming Cheung

Authors
  1. Ming Cheung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Cheung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheung, M. When mind, heart, and hands meet: communication design and designers. Int J Technol Des Educ 22, 489–511 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9155-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9155-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation