Skip to main content
Log in

Welfare effects of VAT reforms: a general equilibrium analysis

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indirect taxes such as value added taxes (VAT) generate a substantial part of tax revenue in many countries. In practice, VAT systems are often characterized by exemptions, reduced rates, and zero ratings. A nonuniform VAT system may generate an efficiency loss and encourage rent-seeking and tax fraud activities. It also has high administrative costs. We use an empirically based computable general equilibrium model for the small, open economy of Norway with a detailed description of direct and indirect taxes, to compare three VAT systems; two different nongeneral and nonuniform VAT systems exemplified by the former and current Norwegian VAT systems and a general and uniform VAT system. Our analysis shows that an imperfect extension of the VAT system to cover more but not all services is welfare inferior to the baseline nonuniform VAT system only covering goods. However, a general and uniform VAT system covering all goods and services is welfare superior to both the imperfect VAT systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaberge, R., Dagsvik, J. K., & Strøm, S. (1995). Labour supply responses and welfare effects of tax reforms. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97(4), 635–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aasness, J., & Åvitsland, T. (2004). Combining CGE and microsimulation models: effects on equality of VAT reforms (Discussion Paper 392). Statistics Norway.

  • Alfsen, K. H., Bye, T. A., & Holmøy, E. (1996). MSG-EE: an applied general equilibrium model for energy and environmental analyses (Social and Economic Studies 96). Statistics Norway.

  • Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1972). The structure of indirect taxation and economic efficiency. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 97–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, C. L., Scholz, J. K., & Shoven, J. B. (1987). The value-added tax: a general equilibrium look at its efficiency and incidence. In M. Feldstein (Ed.), The effects of taxation on capital accumulation (pp. 445–474). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowitz, E. & Cappelen, Å. (2001). Modeling income policies: some Norwegian experiences 1973–1993. Economic Modelling, 18, 349–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bye, B. (2000). Environmental tax reform and producer foresight: an intertemporal computable general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 22(6), 719–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bye, B., & Åvitsland, T. (2003). The welfare effects of housing taxation in a distorted economy: a general equilibrium analysis. Economic Modelling, 20(5), 895–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bye, B., & Holmøy, E. (1997). Household behaviour in the MSG-6 model (Documents 97/13). Statistics Norway.

  • Bye, B., Strøm, B., & Åvitsland, T. (2003). Welfare effects of VAT reforms: A general equilibrium analysis (Discussion Papers No. 343). Statistics Norway.

  • Corlett, W. J., & Hague, D. C. (1953). Complementarity and the excess burden of taxation. Review of Economic Studies, 21, 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., & Stiglitz, J. (1972). On optimal taxation and public production. Review of Economic Studies, 39, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decoster, A., & Schokkaert, E. (1990). Tax reform results with different demand systems. Journal of Public Economics, 41, 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1971a). Optimal taxation and public production 1: Production efficiency. American Economic Review, 61, 8–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1971b). Optimal taxation and public production 2: Tax rules. American Economic Review, 61, 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fæhn, T., & Holmøy, E. (2000). Welfare effect of trade liberalisation in distorted economies: a dynamic general equilibrium assessment for Norway. In Harrison, G. W., et al. (Eds.), Using dynamic general equilibrium models for policy analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, H., Rosenberg, C., & Wiegard, W. (1995). Welfare effects of value-added tax harmonization in Europe: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. H., & Nielsen, S. B. (1997). Tax evasion in an open economy: value added vs. income taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 66(2), 173–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, P., & Wiegard, W. (1991). Exemption versus zero rating: a hidden problem of VAT. Journal of Public Economics, 46, 307–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, K. M., Holmøy, E., Lerskau, L., & Solli, I. F. (2004). Macroeconomic properties of the Norwegian general equilibrium model MSG6 (Reports 2004/18). Statistics Norway.

  • Holmøy, E., & Hægeland, T. (1997). Aggregate productivity effects and technology shocks in a model of heterogeneous firms: the importance of equilibrium adjustments (Discussion Paper 198). Statistics Norway.

  • Holmøy, E., Larsen, B. M., & Vennemo, H. (1993). Historiske brukerpriser på realkapital (Rapporter 93/9). Statistics Norway.

  • Holmøy, E., Nordén, G., & Strøm, B. (1994). MSG-5: a complete description of the system of equations (Rapporter 94/19). Statistics Norway.

  • Keen, M. (2007). VAT attacks! International Tax and Public Finance, 14, 365–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M., & Mintz, J. (2004). The optimal threshold for a value-added tax. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 559–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M., & Smith, S. (2006). VAT fraud and evasion: what do we know and what can be done? National Tax Journal, LIX(4), 861–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klette, T. J. (1994). Estimating price-cost margins and scale economies from a panel of micro data (Discussion Papers 130). Statistics Norway.

  • Konishi, H. (1990). Final and intermediate goods taxes in an oligopolistic economy with free entry. Journal of Public Economics, 42, 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Finance (2009). Perspektivmeldingen 2009, St.meld. nr. 9 (2008–2009).

  • Myles, G. D. (1989). Ramsey tax rules for economies with imperfect competition. Journal of Public Economics, 38, 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myles, G. D. (1995). Public economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, I. W. H., Williams, R. C. III, & Goulder, L. H. (1999). When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare? The fundamental role of distorted factor markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37, 52–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1927). A contribution to the theory of taxation. Economic Journal, 37, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhorn, L. J. (2009). Optimal taxation with monopolistic competition (Unpublished paper). Economics Department, University of Durham.

  • Saez, E. (2002). The desirability of commodity taxation under non-linear income taxation and heterogeneous tastes. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, P. B. (2007). The theory of optimal taxation: what is the policy relevance? International Tax and Public Finance, 14, 383–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steigum, E. Jr. (1993). Accounting for long run effects of fiscal policy by means of computable overlapping generations models. In S. Honkapohja & M. Ingberg (Eds.), Macroeconomic modelling and policy implications. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, I. (1990). Importmodell i MODAG og KVARTS (Rapporter 90/20). Statistics Norway.

  • Wold, I. S. (1998). Modellering av husholdningenes transportkonsum for en analyse av grønne skatter: Muligheter og problemer innenfor rammen av en nyttetremodell (Notater 98/98). Statistics Norway.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brita Bye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bye, B., Strøm, B. & Åvitsland, T. Welfare effects of VAT reforms: a general equilibrium analysis. Int Tax Public Finance 19, 368–392 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-011-9193-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-011-9193-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation