Abstract
In this paper we calculate the strong field limit deflection angle for a light ray passing near a scalar charged spherically symmetric object, described by a metric which comes from the low-energy limit of heterotic string theory. Then, we compare the expansion parameters of our results with those obtained in the Einstein’s canonical frame, obtained by a conformal transformation, and we show that, at least at first order, the results do not agree.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
By making y = A(x) and \(z=\frac {y-y_{0}}{1-y_{0}}\).
For ζ=0 all the expressions reduce to those of Schwarzschild.
The simbol \(\left [\frac {dI_{R}(x_{m})}{d\zeta }\right ]_{\zeta =0}\) means the derivative evaluated at ζ=0.
References
Misner, C., Thorne, K., Wheeler, J.A.: Gravitation. W. H. Freeman and Company, California (1973)
Will, C.M.: The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment. Living Rev. Relativity 9, 3 (2006)
Psaltis, D.: Two approaches to testing general relativity in the strong-field regime. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 189, 012033 (2009)
Einstein, A., Lorentz, H.A., Weyl, H., Minkowski, H.: The principle of Relativity. Dover Publications (1952)
Walsh, D., Carswell, R.F., Weyman, R.J.: 0957 + 561 A, B - Twin quasistellar objects or gravitational lens. Nature 279, 381–384 (1979)
Fort, B., Miller, Y.: Arc(let)s in clusters of galaxies. Astron Astrophys. Rev. 5, 239–292 (1994)
Narasimha, D.: Gravitational microlensing. Bull. Astr. Soc. India 23, 489–502 (1995)
Bozza, V.: Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit. Phys. Rev. D 66, 103001 (2002)
Darwin, C.: The Gravity Field of a Particle. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A249, 180 (1959)
Darwin, C.: The Gravity Field of a Particle. II. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A263, 39 (1961)
Atkiston, R.: On light tracks near a very massive star. Astron. J. 70, 517–523 (1965)
Virbhadra, K.S.: Relativistic images of Schwarzschild black hole lensing. Phys. Rev. D 79, 083004 (2009)
Doeleman, S.S., Fish, V.L., Broderick, A.E., Loeb, A., Rogers, A.E.E.: Detecting flaring structures in Sagittarius A* with high-frequency VLBI. Astrophys. J. 695, 59–74 (2009)
Fish, V.L., Doeleman, S.S.: Observing a black hole event horizon: (sub)millimeter VLBI of Sgr A*. Proc. IAU Symp. 261, 271–276 (2009)
Will, C.M.: Testing the General Relativistic “No Hair” Theorems Using the Galactic Center Black Hole Sagittarius A*. Astrophys. J. 674, L25 (2008)
Broderick, A.E., Johannsen, T., Loeb, A., Psaltis, D.: Testing the No-hair Theorem with Event Horizon Telescope Observations of Sagittarius A*. Astrophys. J. 784, 7 (2014)
Bozza, V., Capozziello, S., Iovane, G., Scarpetta, G.: Strong field limit of black hole gravitational lensing. Gen. Rel. Grav. 33, 1844–1854 (2001)
Virbhadra, K.S., Ellis, G.F.R.: Schwarzschild black hole lensing. Phys. Rev. D 62, 084003 (2000)
Virbhadra, K.S., Ellis, G.F.R.: Gravitational lensing by naked singularities. Phys. Rev. D 65, 103004 (2002)
Eiroa, E.F., Romero, G.E., Torres, D.F.: Reissner-Nordstrm black hole lensing. Phys. Rev. D 66, 024010 (2002)
Bahadra, A.: Gravitational lensing by a charged black hole of string theory. Phys. Rev. D 67, 103009 (2003)
Whisker, R.: Strong gravitational lensing by braneworld black holes. Phys. Rev. D 71, 064004 (2005)
Kar, S.: Naked singularities in low-energy, effective string theory. Class. Quantum Grav. 16, 101–115 (1999)
Wyman, M.: Static spherically symmetric scalar fields in general relativity. Phys. Rev. D 24, 839 (1981)
Virbhadra, K.S.: Janis Newman Winicour and Wyman Solutions are the Same. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12, 4831–4836 (1997)
Virbhadra, K.S.: Nature of singularity in Einstein massless scalar theory. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 6, 357–362 (1997)
Virbhadra, K.S.: Naked singularities and Seiferts conjecture. Phys. Rev. D 60, 104041 (1999)
Virbhadra, K.S., Keeton, C.R.: Time delay and magnification centroid due to gravitational lensing by black holes and naked singularities. Phys. Rev. D 77, 124014 (2008)
Janis, A.I., Newman, E.T., Winicour, J.: Reality of the Schwarzschild Singularity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 878 (1968)
Alvarez, E., Conde, J.: Are the string and Einstein frames equivalent. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12, 4831–4836 (1997)
Virbhadra, K.S., Narasimha, D., Chitre, S.M.: Role of the scalar field in gravitational lensing. Astron. Astrophys. 337, 1–8 (1998)
Claudel, C.M., Virbhadra, K., Ellis, G.: The geometry of photon surfaces. J. Math. Phys. 42, 818–838 (2001)
Brans, C., Dicke, C.H.: Mach’s Priciple and Relativistic Theory of Gravitation. Phys. Rev. 124, 925 (1961)
Jordan, P.: Zum gegenwiirtigen Stand der Diracschen kosmologischen Hypothesen. Z. Phys. 157 (1959)
Dicke, R.H.: Mach’s Principle and Invariance under Transformation of Units. Phys. Rev. 125, 2163 (1962)
Damour, T., Esposito-Farese, G.: Tensor-multi-scalar theories of gravitation. Class. Quant. Grav. 9, 2093 (1992)
Faraoni, V., Gunzig, E.: Einstein frame or Jordan frame? Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 217 (1999)
Capozziello, S., Martin-Moruno, P.C., Rubano, P.: Physical non-equivalence of the Jordan and Einstein frames. Phys. Lett. B 689, 117–121 (2010)
Postma, M., Volponi, M.: Equivalence of the Einstein and Jordan frames. Phys. Rev. D 90, 103516 (2014)
Faroni, V., Gunzig, E.: Einstein frame or Jordan frame? J. Theor. Phys. 38, 217 (1999)
Magnano, G., Sokolowski, L.M.: On Physical Equivalence between Nonlinear Gravity Theories and a General Relativistic Self Gravitating Scalar Field. Phys. Rev. D 50, 5039–5059 (1994)
Corda, C.: Interferometric detection of gravitational waves: the definitive test for General Relativity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 18, 2275–2282 (2009)
Corda, C.: Gravitational wave astronomy: the definitive test for the ’Einstein frame versus Jordan frame’ controversy. Astrop. Phys. 34, 412–419 (2011)
Quiros, I., Garcia-Salcedo, R.: The conformal transformations controversy: what are we missing? Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 45, 489–518 (2013)
Eisenhouer, F., et al.: SPIE Conf. Ser 7013 (2008)
Gillisen, S., et al.: Proc. SPIE 7734. Optical and Infrared Interferometry II (2010)
Acknowledgments
Thanks are due to K. S Virbhadra and F. A. Diaz for valuable discussions and helpful correspondence, and to the anonymous referees for their constructive inputs. This research was supported by the National Astronomical Observatory, National University of Colombia and one of us, A.C., also thanks the Department of Mathematics, Konrad Lorenz University for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: Finding \(\hat {\alpha }(\theta )\) for Kar’s Metric
Appendix A: Finding \(\hat {\alpha }(\theta )\) for Kar’s Metric
In order to calculate the deflection angle in the strong field limit, we used Kar’s metric in the form proposed in (17), i.e.,
The deflection angle is calculated using the strong field expansion [8, 19]
where
and
1.1 Calculation of \(\bar {a}\):
Using (5), (6), (9), (21) and (40) we obtain that
Evaluating the last expression at z=0 we obtain
where
From (9) we obtain that
and taking into account (21) it is possible to express R(0,x m ) and β m and terms of the photon sphere as,
then, from (12)
1.2 Calculation of u m :
From (13) the impact parameter is calculated as,
then, using (40), (21) and taking into account that A(x m ) = y m
1.3 Calculation of b R :
The term b R is calculated by (14), which corresponds to the regular part of the integral (10), i. e.,
However, as is pointed out in Ref. [8], b R can not be calculated analytically but by an expansion of I R (x m ) in powers of some metric’s parameter. In this sense, to calculate the regular term for Kar’s metric (17), we made and expansion of I R (x m ) in powers of ζ around ζ=0Footnote 3 and used the first order expansion as our b R . Mathematically this idea is
and taking terms up to first order in ζ we have thatFootnote 4
In this sense, in order to calculate the regular term b R , it is necessary to find the functional form of R(z,x m ), f(z,x m ), R(0,x m ) and f 0(z,x m ). The form of R(z,x m ) and R(0,x m ) are already shown in (44) and (45). From (6), (7) and (22) we have that
and
where
As (55) shows, the value of I R (x m ) reduces to that of Schwarzschild for ζ=0. Therefore, for 0≤z≤1 (|z| = z) we obtain
On the other hand,
where f S (z,x m ), f 0S (z,x m ) are those of Schwarzschild (Cfr. [8]). Therefore,
where all derivatives, evaluated at ζ=0, are:
Thus,
The latter integrals were calculated numerically as
Therefore, b R for Kar’s metric is
Finally, the deflection angle for Kar’s metric is
where u m , β m and y m are given by (52), (22) and (46) respectively.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benavides, C.A., Cárdenas-Avendaño, A. & Larranaga, A. Gravitational Lensing in the Strong Field Limit for Kar’s Metric. Int J Theor Phys 55, 2219–2236 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-015-2861-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-015-2861-2