Abstract
Student mastery of rational number and proportional reasoning is a recognized challenge, yet supporting mastery is central within mathematics and science. This paper focuses on a 4-lesson teaching programme which was designed to foster mastery in the context of intensive quantities. Intensive quantities such as density, speed and temperature depend upon proportional relations, require rational number for their representation and are relevant to science. Two versions of the teaching programme were developed, one using ratio representation and the other using fractions. Implementation with 535 children aged 9–11 years revealed that both versions promoted mastery of fractions, whilst the ratio version also supported proportional reasoning. It is suggested that the ratio version provides useful foundations for teaching, even with children who, as with the present sample, have no previous experience of ratios themselves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, R. J. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.
Behr, M. J., Lesh, R., Post, T. R. & Silver, E. A. (1983). Rational-number concepts. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes (pp. 91–126). New York: Academic.
Ben-Chaim, D., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Benedetto, C. & Miller, J. (1998). Proportional reasoning among 7th grade students with different curricular experiences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 247–273.
Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P. & Baines, E. (1999). The nature and use of classroom groups in schools. End-of-Award Report of ESRC Project R000237255.
Boom, J., Hoijtink, H. & Kunnen, S. (2001). Rules in the balance: Classes, strategies, or rules for the balance scale task? Cognitive Development, 16, 717–735.
Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carraher, D. W. (1996). Learning about fractions. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, B. Sriraman & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 241–266). London: Routledge.
Charalambous, C. Y. & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2007). Drawing on a theoretical model to study students’ understanding of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64, 293–316.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Reston: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010). Key points in mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/key-points-in-mathematics.
Cowan, R. & Sutcliffe, N. B. (1991). What children’s temperature predictions reveal of their understanding of temperature. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 300–309.
Dean, A. L. & Frankhouser, J. R. (1988). Way stations in the development of childrens proportionality concepts: the stage issue revisited. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 129–149.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) (2001). Framework for teaching mathematics: Years 7, 8 and 9. London: DfEE.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2006). Primary framework for literacy and mathematics. London: DfES.
Desli, D. (1999). Children’s understanding of intensive quantities. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London.
Dixon, J. A. & Moore, C. F. (1996). The development of intuitive principles in choosing mathematical strategies. Developmental Psychology, 32, 241–253.
Hart, K. (1988). Ratios and proportions. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 198–219). Reston: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hodgen, J., Brown, M., Coe, R. & Küchemann, D. (2009). Increasing competence and confidence in algebra and multiplicative structures. Project Report at Kings College, London.
Howe, C., Nunes, T. & Bryant, P. (2010). Intensive quantities: Why they matter to developmental research. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 307–329.
Hunting, R. P. (1999). Rational number in the preschool years: What is possible? In J. V. Copley (Ed.), Mathematics in the early years (pp. 80–87). Reston: NCTM.
Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.
Jager, S. & Wilkening, F. (2001). Development of cognitive averaging: When light and light make dark. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 323–345.
Karplus, R., Pulos, S. & Stage, E. K. (1983). Proportional reasoning of early adolescents. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes (pp. 45–90). New York: Academic.
Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Towards a theoretical framework for research. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629–667). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Lesh, R., Post, T. & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93–118). Reston: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B. & d’Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423–458.
Moseley, B. (2005). Students’ early mathematical representation knowledge: The effects of emphasizing single or multiple perspectives of the rational number domain in problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 37–69.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2007). Conceptual knowledge and skills task force. St Louis Meeting Progress Report.
Noelting, G. (1980). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept. Part I—Differentiation of stages. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 217–253.
Nunes, T. & Bryant, P. (1996). Children doing mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nunes, T. & Bryant, P. (2009). Understanding rational numbers and intensive quantities. London: Nuffield Foundation.
Nunes, T., Bryant, P. & Hurry, J. (2004). The role of awareness in teaching and learning literacy and numeracy in Key Stage 2. End-of-award Report of ESRC Project L139251015.
Nunes, T., Desli, D. & Bell, D. (2003). The development of children’s understanding of intensive quantities. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 651–675.
Piaget, J. Grize, J.-B., Szeminska, A. & Bang, V. (1977). Epistemology and the psychology of functions. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1975). The origin of the idea of chance in children. London: Routledge.
Schwartz, J. L. (1988). Intensive quantity and referent transforming arithmetic operations. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 41–52). Reston: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Scottish Executive (2002). National statement for improving attainment in numeracy. Edinburgh: HMSO.
Siegler, R. S. (1981). Developmental sequences within and between concepts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 189, 46, No. 2.
Stavy, R. & Tirosh, D. (2000). How students (mis-)understand science and mathematics. New York: Teachers College Press.
Streefland, L. (1997). Charming fractions or fractions being charmed. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Learning and teaching mathematics: An international perspective (pp. 347–372). Hove: Psychology Press.
Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 179–234). New York: State University of New York Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Howe, C., Nunes, T. & Bryant, P. RATIONAL NUMBER AND PROPORTIONAL REASONING: USING INTENSIVE QUANTITIES TO PROMOTE ACHIEVEMENT IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 9, 391–417 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9249-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9249-9