Skip to main content
Log in

The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept Part I — Differentiation of stages

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two related problems have to be solved before we can have a clearer picture of cognitive development:

  1. (i)

    Is development hierarchical, leading to higher-order systems controlling lower-order subsytems?

  2. (ii)

    If so, what are the mechanisms involved in a process of development?

These two problems will be studied here taking as example a concept which finds its achievement only in late adolesence: the concept of proportion. Part I of this article is devoted to the first problem. It will bear on the experiment which was undertaken and the analysis of results leading to a differentiation of stages of development. These stages will be illustrated by typical protocols of each stage.

Part II will be devoted to problem solving strategies at each stage, and finally to a second order analysis leading to an attempt to interpret the passage from one stage to the next in terms of increasing equilibration or adaptive restructuring of the strategies put to use to solve problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AusubelD. P.: The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning, Grune and Stratton, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begin, Louis-Réal: ‘Genèse de la notion de rapport chez un groupe d'enfants de 4 à 9 ans’, Thèse de maîtrise, Université Laval. Québec, 1973.

  • BeilinH.: ‘The training and acquisition of logical operations’, in Piagetian Cognitive-Development Research and Mathematical Education, edited by M.F.Rosskopf, L.P.Steffe and S.Taback, Washington D.C., pp. 81–124. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellemare, Thérèse: ’La méthode Cuisenaire et le développement opératoire de la pensée’, Thèse de doctorat, Université Laval, Québec, 1966.

  • Bellemare, Thérèse: La méthode Cuisenaire-Gattegno et le développement opératoire de la pensée, Delachaux et Niestlé, Neuchâtel, 1967.

  • Cardinal, Gilbert: ‘Méthodologie de construction expérimentale d'épreuves opératoires’, Thèse de maîtrise, Université Laval, Québec, 1973.

  • Cloutier, Richard: ‘Standardisation de l'épreuve des concentrations’, Thèse de maîtrise, Université Laval, Québec, 1970.

  • DixonW. G.: Biomedical Computer Programs, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuquetteRaymond J. ‘Some thoughts on Piaget's findings and the teaching of fractions’, The Arithmetic Teacher 19, 273–275. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Washington, D.C., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • FishbeinE., PampuE., and ManzatI.: ‘Comparison of ratios and the chance concept in children’, Child Development 41, (1970), 365–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • FreudenthalH.: Mathematics as an Educational Task, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • FreudenthalH.: Weeding and Sowing. Preface to a Science of Mathematical Education, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H., Janssen, G. M., and Sweers, W. J. (eds.): ‘Five years IOWO’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 1–2, (1976), 189–367.

  • GuttmanL.: ‘A basis for scaling qualitative data’, Amer. Sociol. Rev., 9, (1944), 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • GuttmanL.: ‘On Festinger's evaluation of scale analysis’, Psychol. Bull. 44 (1947a), 451–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • GuttmanL.: ‘The Cornell technique for scale and intensity analysis’ Educ. Psychol. Measmt., 7, (1947b), 247–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • GuttmanL.: ‘The basis for scalogram analysis’, in Stouffer, S. A. et al., Measurement and Prediction, Princeton University Press, N.J., (1950), 60–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • InhelderB. et PiagetJ.: De la logique de l'enfant à la logique de l'adolescent, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (Deuxième édition 1970). Translated as: The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence. An Essay on the Construction of Formal Operational Structures, Basic Books, New York, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • InhelderB. et PiagetJ.: La genèse des structures logiques élémentaires, Delachaux et Niestlé, Neuchâtel (Deuxième édition 1967). Translated as The Early Growth of Logic in the Child: Classification and Seriation, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • KarplusR. and PetersonR. W.: ‘Intellectual development beyond elementary school II; Ratio, a survey’, School-Science and Mathematics 70, (1970), 813–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • KarplusR. and KarplusE. F.: ‘Intellectual development beyond elementary school III: Ratio, a longitudinal survey’, Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California, Berkeley, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieren, T. E.: ‘On the Mathematical, Cognitive and Instructional Foundations of Rational Numbers, in R. Lesh (ed.), Number and Measurement: Papers from a Research Workshop, ERIC/SMEAC, Ohio, State University, Columbus, 1976.

  • LaurendeauM. et PinardA.: La pensée causale, Institut de Recherches Psychologiques, Montréal, et Presses Universitaires de France, Paris. Translated as: Causal Thinking in the Child. A Genetic and Experimental Approach, International Universities Press, New York, (second edition 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • LaurendeauM. et PinardA.: Les premières notions spatiales de l'enfant, Delachaux et Niestlé, Neuchâtel. (English edition: Basic Books, New York), 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeshR. A.: ‘An interpretation of advanced organizers’, Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 7, (1976), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • LovellK.: ‘Mathematical Concepts’, in Analyses of Concept Learning, edited by H. J.Klausmeier and C. W.Harris, Academic Press, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • LovellK.: ‘Intellectual growth and understanding mathematics implications for teaching’, The Arithmetic Teacher 19, (1972), 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • LovellK. and Butterworth,.: ‘Abilities underlying the understanding of proportionality’, Mathematics Teaching 37, (1966), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • LunzerE. A. and PumphreyW.: ‘Understanding proportionality’, Mathematics Teaching 34, (1966), 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • NieN. H., HullC. H., SteinbrennerK., and BentD.-H.: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Second Edition, McGraw Hill, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noelting, G.: ‘The development of four mathematical concepts in the child and adolescent: ratio, fraction, chance and geometric projection’, Meeting of the Canadian Association for Mathematical Education, Kingston (Ontario), 1978.

  • Noelting, G.: ‘Stages and mechanisms in the development of the concept of proportion in the child and adolescent’, in Poulsen, M. A. et al. (eds.), Piagetian Theory and the Helping Professions: 5th Annual Conference, Los Angeles, California, 1976.

  • NoeltingG. et CloutierR.: ‘Le développement de la notion de proportion chez l'enfant et l'adolescent’, rapport de recherche, Laboratoire de Psychologie du développement, Université Laval, Québec, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • NoeltingG., CloutierR. et CardinalG.: ‘Stades et mécanismes dans le développement de la notion de proportion chez l'enfant et l'adolescent’ (l'épreuve des concentrations), rapport de recherche, Université Laval, Québec, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noelting, G.: ‘The qualitative and quantitative aspects in the development of the concept of fraction’ (sharing cakes experiment), paper given at the NATO International Conference on Intelligence and Learning, York, England, 1979.

  • Novillis, C.: ‘An analysis of the fraction concept into a hierarchy of selected subconcepts and testing of hierarchical dependencies at grade levels, 4, 5, 6’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, 1973.

  • PiagetJ. et InhelderB.: La genèse de l'idée de hasard chez l'enfant, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris. Translated as: The Origin of the Idea of Chance in Children, Norton, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romberg, T. and de Vault, V.: ‘Mathematics curriculum: needed research, Journal of Research and Development in Education 1, (1967).

  • Rousseau-Savard, C.: ‘Epreuve des concentrations: étude de l'instrument et de ses résultats’, thèse de licence, Université Laval, Québec, 1969.

  • Scallon, G.: ‘Etude de l'habilité à résoudre des problèmes nouveaux avec le développement génétique et le degré de connaissance chez des élèves du cours primaire, thèse de licence, Université Laval, Québec, 1966.

  • SiegelS.: Non Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw Hill, New York, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • SteffeL. P. and ParrR. B.: ‘The development of the concepts of ratio and fraction, in the fourth, fifth and sixth years of the elementary school, Technical Report No. 49, Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, S.: ‘Curvilinear development in proportional reasoning or that's funny, I wouldn't have thought you were U-ish’, Tel Aviv University, unpublished manuscript, 1977.

  • StreeflandL.: ‘Some observational results concerning the mental constitution of the concept of fraction’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 9, (1978), 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • SullivanE. V.: Piaget and the School Curriculum: A Critical Appraisal, The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, bulletin no. 2, The Institute, Toronto, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • TørgersonW. J.: Theory and Methods of Scaling, Wiley, N.Y., 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • WeaverJ. F.: ‘Some concerns about the application of Piaget's theory and research to mathematical learning and instruction’, The Arithmetic Teacher 19, (1972), 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • WhiteW. and SaltzE.: ‘Measurement of reproducibility’, Psychol. Bull. 54, (1957), 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • WohlwillJ. F.: ‘Methodology and research strategy in the study of developmental change’, in L. R.Goulet and P. B.Baltes (eds.), Life-Span Developmental Psychology, Academic Press, New York and London, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • WollmanW. and KarplusR.: ‘Intellectual development beyond elementary school V: Using ratio in different tasks’, Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California, Berkeley, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noelting, G. The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept Part I — Differentiation of stages. Educ Stud Math 11, 217–253 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304357

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304357

Keywords

Navigation