Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient pseudo-spectral solvers for the PKN model of hydrofracturing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the paper, a novel algorithm employing pseudo-spectral approach is developed for the PKN model of hydrofracturing. The respective solvers compute both the solution and its temporal derivative. In comparison with conventional solvers, they demonstrate significant cost effectiveness in terms of balance between the accuracy of computations and densities of the temporal and spatial meshes. Various fluid flow regimes are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adachi J, Detournay E (2002) Self-similar solution of a plane–strain fracture driven by a power-law fluid. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 26:579–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adachi J, Peirce A (2007) Asymptotic analysis of an elasticity equation for a finger-like hydraulic fracture. J Elast 90(1): 43–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Adachi J, Siebrits E, Peirce A, Desroches J (2007) Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:739–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter E (1957) Optimum fluid characteristics for fracture extension. In: Howard G, Fast C (eds) Drilling and production practices. American Petroleum Institute, pp 261–270

  • Crittendon BC (1959) The mechanics of design and interpertation of hydraulic fracture treatments. J Pet Tech 21:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Detournay E (2004) Propagation regimes of fluid-driven fractures in impermeable rocks. Int J Geomech 4:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobroskok AA, Linkov AM (2011) Modeling of fluid flow, stress state and seismicity induced in rock by instant pressure drop in a hydrofracture. J Min Sci 47(1):10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economides M, Nolte K (eds) (2000) Reservoir stimulation, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester

  • Garagash DI, Detournay E (2000) The tip region of a fluid-driven fracture in an elastic medium. J Appl Mech 67:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertsma J, de Klerk F (1969) A rapid method of predicting width and extent of hydraulically induced fractures. J Pet Tech 21:1571–1581 [SPE 2458]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbert MK, Willis DG (1957) Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing. J Pet Tech 9(6):153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp LF (1989) Study of Nordgren’s equation of hydraulic fracturing. SPE Prod Eng 5:311–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Khristianovic SA, Zheltov YP (1955) Formation of vertical fractures by means of highly viscous liquid. In: Proceedings of the fourth world petroleum congress, Rome, pp 579–586

  • Kovalyshen Y, Detournay E (2009) A reexamination of the classical PKN model of hydraulic fracture. Transp Porous Media 81:317–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovalyshen Y (2010) Fluid-driven fracture in poroelastic medium. PhD thesis, The University of Minnesota

  • Kusmierczyk P, Mishuris G, Wrobel M (2012) Remarks on numerical simulation of the PKN model of hydrofracturing in proper variables. Various leak-off regimes. arXiv:1211.6474

  • Lecampion B, Detournay E (2007) An implicit algorithm for the propagation of a hydraulic fracture with a fluid lag. Comput Method Appl Mech 196(49–52):4863–4880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov AM (2011) Speed equation and its application for solving ill-posed problems of hydraulic fracturing. ISSM 1028-3358. Doklady Phys 56(8): 436–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Linkov AM (2011) Use of a speed equation for numerical simulation of hydraulic fractures. arXiv:1108.6146

  • Linkov AM (2011) On efficient simulation of hydraulic fracturing in terms of particle velocity. Int J Eng Sci 52:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishuris G, Wrobel M, Linkov A (2012) On modeling hydraulic fracture in proper variables: stiffness, accuracy, sensitivity. Int J Eng Sci 61:10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SL, Kuske R, Peirce A (2007) An asymptotic framework for finite hydraulic fractures including leakoff. SIAM J Appl Math 67(2):364–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SL, Kuske R, Peirce AP (2007) An asymptotic framework for the analysis of hydraulic fractures: the impermeable case. ASME J Appl Mech 74(2):365–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos D (2012) The importance of stress and fractures in hydrofracturing and stimulation performance: a geomechanics overview. Search and Discovery Article 80255

  • Nordgren RP (1972) Propagation of a vertical hydraulic fracture. J Pet Tech 253:306–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson JE (2008) Multi-fracture propagation modeling: applications to hydraulic fracturing in shales and tight gas sands. In: The 42nd US rock mechanics symposium (USRMS), June 29–July 2, 2008, San Francisco, CA, USA

  • Peirce A, Detournay E (2008) An implicit level set method for modeling hydraulically driven fractures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:2858–2885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce A, Detournay E (2009) An Eulerian moving front algorithm with weak-form tip asymptotics for modeling hydraulically driven fractures. Numer Methods Eng 25(2):185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins TK, Kern LR (1961) Widths of hydraulic fractures. J Pet Tech 13(9):37–49 [SPE 89]

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin AM (1995) Propagation of magma filled cracks. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 23:287–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon IN, Elliot HA (1946) The opening of a Griffith crack under internal pressure. Quart Appl Math 4:262–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai VC, Rice JR (2010) A model for turbulent hydraulic fracture and application to crack propagation at glacier beds. J Geophys Res 115:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Jeffrey R, Llanos EM (2004) A study of shear hydraulic fracture propagation. In: Gulf rocks, the 6th North America rock mechanics symposium (NARMS), June 5–9, 2004, Houston, TX, USA

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Institute of Mathematics and Physics of Aberystwyth University and EUROTECH Sp. z o. o. for the facilities and hospitality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gennady Mishuris.

Additional information

This work has been done in the framework of the EU FP7 PEOPLE project under contract number PIAP-GA-2009-251475-HYDROFRAC.

Appendix: Numerical benchmarks

Appendix: Numerical benchmarks

Let us define a set of benchmark solutions useful for testing different numerical solvers. Consider a class of positive functions \(C_+(0,1)\) described in the following manner:

$$\begin{aligned}&C_+(0,1)=\left\{ h\in C^2(0,1)\cap C[0,1],\right. \\&\left. \lim _{x\rightarrow 1-}(1-x)^{\!-\!1/3}h(x)\!=\!1,\quad h(x)> 0,\quad x\in [0,1)\right\} . \end{aligned}$$

By taking an arbitrary \(h\in C_+(0,1)\), one can build a benchmark solution for the normalized formulation of the problem as:

$$\begin{aligned} u(x)=u_0\psi _j(t)h(x). \end{aligned}$$
(63)

where functions \(\psi _j(t)\) and \(h(x)\) are specified below. On substitution of (63) into (26) one finds:

$$\begin{aligned}&q_l(t,x) = \gamma u_0\left[ \frac{1}{\beta }\left( x h^3(x)h^{\prime }(x)\right. \right. \nonumber \\&\qquad \quad \qquad \left. \left. +3\left( h^3( x)h^{\prime }(x)\right) ^{\prime }\right) - h( x)\right] \psi _j^\alpha (t),\nonumber \\&w_0(t) = u_0\psi _j(t), \end{aligned}$$
(64)

where two sets of the benchmark solutions can be considered. For the first one we choose \(\psi _1(t)=e^{\gamma t}\) and \(\beta =2/3\), \(\alpha =1\), while for the second, \(\psi _2(t)=(a+t)^\gamma \) and \(\beta =2\gamma /(3\gamma +1)\), \(\alpha =(3\gamma -1)/\gamma \). Corresponding crack lengths are defined in (25) and (30), respectively. Finally, the injection flux rate is computed from the boundary condition (16)\(_1\):

$$\begin{aligned} q_0(t)=-\frac{u_0^4\psi ^4_j(t)}{L(t)}h^3(0)h^{\prime }(0), \end{aligned}$$
(65)

while the initial condition reads \(W(x)=u_0\psi _j(0)h(x)\).

Note that when taking the function \(h(x)\) from the class \(C_+(0,1)\) in the following representation:

$$\begin{aligned}&h(x)=(1-x)^{1/3}(1+s(x)), \\&s\in C^2[0,1], \quad s( x)>-1,\quad x\in [0,1) \end{aligned}$$

\(q_l\) automatically satisfies the condition \(q_l(t,x)=O((1-x)^{1/3}),x\rightarrow 1.\)

The presented benchmarks allow one to test numerical schemes in various fracture propagation regimes (accelerating/decelerating cracks) by choosing proper values of the parameter \(\gamma \) [see Mishuris et al. (2012)]. Additionally, if one reduces the requirements for the smoothness of \(s(x)\) near \(x=1\), assuming that \(h\in C^2[0,1)\cap H^\alpha (0,1)\) the benchmark can serve to model singular leak-off regimes [compare with (61)].

Note that the zero leak-off case cannot be described by the aforementioned group of benchmarks. However, an analytical benchmark for this regime, represented in terms of a rapidly converging series, has been developed in Linkov (2011c).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wrobel, M., Mishuris, G. Efficient pseudo-spectral solvers for the PKN model of hydrofracturing. Int J Fract 184, 151–170 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-013-9847-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-013-9847-y

Keywords

Navigation