Skip to main content
Log in

Trade-offs between chemical defence and regrowth capacity in Plantago lanceolata

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Resistance and tolerance are different strategies of plants to deal with herbivore attack. Since resources are limited and resistance and tolerance serve similar functions for plants, trade-offs between these two strategies have often been postulated. In this study we investigated trade-offs between resistance and one aspect of tolerance, the ability to regrow after defoliation. In order to minimize confounding effects of genetic background and selection history, we used offspring derived from artificial selection lines of ribwort plantain (Plantago lanceolata) that differed in their levels of leaf iridoid glycosides (IGs), allelochemicals that confer resistance to generalist herbivores, to study genetic associations with regrowth ability. We tested whether high-IG plants (1) suffer allocation costs of resistance in terms of reduced shoot and root growth, (2) have reduced regrowth ability (tolerance) after defoliation compared to low-IG plants, and (3) whether such costs are more pronounced under nutrient stress. High-IG plants produced fewer inflorescences and side rosettes than low-IG plants and showed a different biomass allocation pattern, but since neither the vegetative, nor the reproductive biomass differed between the lines, there was no evidence for a cost of IG production in terms of total biomass production under either nutrient condition. High-IG plants also did not suffer a reduced capacity to regrow shoot mass after defoliation. However, after regrowth, root mass of high-IG plants grown under nutrient-poor conditions was significantly lower than that of low-IG plants. This suggests that under these conditions shoot regrowth of high-IG plants comes at a larger expense of root growth than in low-IG plants. We speculate therefore that if there is repeated defoliation, high-IG plants may eventually fail to maintain shoot regrowth capacity and that trade-offs between resistance and tolerance in this system will show up after repeated defoliation events under conditions of low resource availability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler LS, Schmitt J, Bowers MD (1995) Genetic-variation in defensive chemistry in Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae) and its effect on the specialist herbivore Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae). Oecologia 101:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA (2011) Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence. Funct Ecol 25:420–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Fishbein M (2008) Phylogenetic escalation and decline of plant defense strategies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:10057–10060

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barton KE (2008) Phenotypic plasticity in seedling defense strategies: compensatory growth and chemical induction. Oikos 117:917–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR, Nitao JK (1986) Constraints on chemical coevolution: wild parsnip and the wild parsnip webworm. Evolution 40:1215–1228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bergelson J, Purrington CB (1996) Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants. Am Nat 148:536–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biere A, Marak HB, van Damme JMM (2004) Plant chemical defense against herbivores and pathogens: generalized defense or trade-offs? Oecologia 140:430–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MD (1983) The role of iridoid glycosides in host-plant specificity of checkerspot butterflies. J Chem Ecol 9:475–793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MD (1991) Iridoid glycosides. In: Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR (eds) Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 297–325

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MD (1992) Evolution of unpalatability and the cost of chemical defense in insects. In: Roitberg BD, Isman MB (eds) Insect chemical ecology: an evolutionary approach. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 216–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MD, Puttick GM (1988) Response of generalist and specialist insects to qualitative allelochemical variation. J Chem Ecol 14:319–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MD, Stamp NE (1992) Chemical variation within and between individuals of Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae). J Chem Ecol 18:985–995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MD, Stamp NE (1993) Effects of plant-age, genotype, and herbivory on Plantago performance and chemistry. Ecology 74:1778–1791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant JP, Chapin FS, Klein DR (1983) Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant JP, Chapin FS, Reichardt P et al (1985) Adaptation to resource availability as a determinant of chemical defense strategies in woody plants. Recent Adv Phytochem 19:219–237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant JP, Tuomi J, Niemelä P (1988) Environmental constraint of constitutive and long-term inducible defenses in woody plants. In: Spencer KC (ed) Chemical medation of coevolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 367–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavers PB, Bassett IJ, Crompton CW (1980) The biology of Canadian weeds. 47. Plantago lanceolata L. Can J Plant Sci 60:1269–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1983) Herbivory. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrow K, Bowers MD (1999) Effects of herbivore damage and nutrient level on induction of iridoid glycosides in Plantago lanceolata. J Chem Ecol 25:1427–1440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Deyn GB, Biere A, van der Putten WH et al (2009) Chemical defense, mycorrhizal colonization and growth responses in Plantago lanceolata L. Oecologia 160:433–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong G, van der Meijden E (2000) On the correlation between allocation to defence and regrowth in plants. Oikos 88:503–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RA, Paiva NL (1995) Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 7:1085–1097

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duff RB, Bacon JSD, Mundie CM et al (1965) Catalpol and methylcatalpol: naturally ocurring glycosides in Plantago and Buddleia species. Biochem J 96:1–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fineblum WL, Rausher MD (1995) Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory. Nature 377:517–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fons F, Tousch D, Rapior S et al (1999) Phenolic profiles of untransformed and hairy root cultures of Plantago lanceolata. Plant Physiol Biochem 37:291–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fornoni J (2011) Ecological and evolutionary implications of plant tolerance to herbivory. Funct Ecol 25:399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornoni J, Valverde PL, Núñez-Farfán J (2004a) Population variation in the cost and benefit of tolerance and resistance against herbivory in Datura stramonium. Evolution 58:1696–1704

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fornoni J, Núñez-Farfán J, Valverde PL et al (2004b) Evolution of mixed strategies of plant defense allocation against natural enemies. Evolution 58:1685–1695

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gershenzon J (1984) Changes in the levels of plant secondary metabolites under water and nutrient stress. Recent Adv Phytochem 18:273–320

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giamoustaris A, Mithen R (1995) The effect of modifying the glucosinolate content of leaves of oilseed rape (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera) on its interaction with specialist and generalist pests. Ann Appl Biol 126:347–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q Rev Biol 67:283–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirata K, Asada M, Yatani E et al (1993) Effects of near-ultraviolet light on alkaloid production in Catharanthus roseus plants. Planta Med 59:46–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa Y, Kubo T (1997) Optimal size of storage for recovery after unpredictable disturbances. Evol Ecol 11:41–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katjiua MLJ, Ward D (2006) Resistance and tolerance of Terminalia sericea trees to simulated herbivore damage under different soil nutrient and moisture conditions. J Chem Ecol 32:1431–1443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leimu R, Koricheva J (2006) A meta-analysis of tradeoffs between plant tolerance and resistance to herbivores: combining the evidence from ecological and agricultural studies. Oikos 112:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzaneda AJ, Prasad KVSK, Mitchell-Olds T (2010) Variation and fitness costs for tolerance to different types of herbivore damage in Boechera stricta genotypes with contrasting glucosinolate structures. New Phytol 188:464–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marak HB, Biere A, van Damme JMM (2000) Direct and correlated responses to selection on iridoid glycosides in Plantago lanceolata L. J Evol Biol 13:985–996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marak HB, Biere A, van Damme JMM (2002) Two herbivore-deterrent iridoid glycosides reduce the in vitro growth of a specialist but not of a generalist pathogenic fungus of Plantago lanceolata L. Chemoecology 12:185–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marak HB, Biere A, van Damme JMM (2003) Fitness costs of chemical defense in Plantago lanceolata L.: effects of nutrient and competition stress. Evolution 57:2519–2530

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mauricio R, Rausher MD, Burdick DS (1997) Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muola A, Mutikainen P, Laukkanen L et al (2010) Genetic variation in herbivore resistance and tolerance: the role of plant life-history stage and type of damage. J Evol Biol 23:2185–2196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen M, Suomi J, van Nouhuys S et al (2003) Effect of iridoid glycoside content on oviposition host plant choice and parasitism in a specialist herbivore. J Chem Ecol 29:823–844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez-Farfán J, Fornoni J, Valverde PL (2007) The evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:541–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oduor AMO, Lankau RA, Strauss SY et al (2011) Introduced Brassica nigra populations exhibit greater growth and herbivore resistance but less tolerance than native populations in the native range. New Phytol 191:536–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pereyra PC, Bowers MD (1988) Iridoid glycosides as oviposition stimulants for the buckeye butterfly, Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae). J Chem Ecol 14:917–928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preisser EL, Gibson SE, Adler LS et al (2007) Underground herbivory and the costs of constitutive defense in tobacco. Acta Oecol 31:210–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Antonovics J (1982) Experimental ecological genetics in Plantago. VII. Reproductive effort in populations of P. lanceolata L. Evolution 36:742–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restif O, Koella JC (2004) Concurrent evolution of resistance and tolerance to pathogens. Am Nat 164:E90–E102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reudler Talsma JH, Biere A, Harvey JA et al (2008) Oviposition cues for a specialist butterfly: plant chemistry and size. J Chem Ecol 34:1202–1212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reudler JH, Biere A, Harvey JA et al (2011) Differential performance of a specialist and two generalist herbivores and their parasitoids on Plantago lanceolata. J Chem Ecol 37:765–778

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roitto M, Rautio P, Markkola A et al (2009) Induced accumulation of phenolics and sawfly performance in Scots pine in response to previous defoliation. Tree Physiol 29:207–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rooke T, Bergstrom R (2007) Growth, chemical responses and herbivory after simulated leaf browsing in Combretum apiculatum. Plant Ecol 189:201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal JP, Kotanen PM (1994) Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 9:145–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt S, Baldwin IT (2009) Down-regulation of systemin after herbivory is associated with increased root allocation and competitive ability in Solanum nigrum. Oecologia 159:473–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens DH, Garner SH, Michell-Olds T et al (2002) Costs of defense in the context of plant competition: Brassica rapa may grow and defend. Ecology 83:505–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamp NE, Bowers MD (1994) Effects of cages, plant age and mechanical clipping on plantain chemistry. Oecologia 99:66–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens MT, Waller DM, Lindroth RL (2007) Resistance and tolerance in Populus tremuloides: genetic variation, costs, and environmental dependency. Evol Ecol 21:829–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe JR (2002) Can tolerance traits impose selection on herbivores? Evol Ecol 16:595–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stowe KA (1998) Experimental evolution of resistance in Brassica rapa: correlated response of tolerance in lines selected for glucosinolate content. Evolution 52:703–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stowe KA, Marquis RJ (2011) Costs of defense: correlated reponses to divergent selection for foliar glucosinolate content in Brassica rapa. Evol Ecol 25:763–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stowe KA, Marquis RJ, Hochwender CG et al (2000) The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:565–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Agrawal AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 14:179–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Siemens DH, Decher MB et al (1999) Ecological costs of plant resistance to herbivores in the currency of pollination. Evolution 53:1105–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Rudgers JA, Lau JA et al (2002) Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 17:278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Watson W, Allen MT (2003) Predictors of male and female tolerance to insect herbivory in Raphanus raphanistrum. Ecology 84:2074–2082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suomi J, Wiedmer SK, Jussila M et al (2001) Determination of iridoid glycosides by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography-mass spectrometry with use of the partial filing technique. Electrophoresis 22:2580–2587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiffin P (2000a) Mechanisms of tolerance to herbivore damage: what do we know? Evol Ecol 14:523–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiffin P (2000b) Are tolerance, avoidance, and antibiosis evolutionarily and ecologically equivalent responses of plants to herbivores? Am Nat 155:128–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker C, Avila-Sakar G (2010) Ontogenetic changes in tolerance to herbivory in Arabidopsis. Oecologia 164:1005–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi J, Niemela P, Chapin FS et al (1988) Defensive responses of trees in relation to their carbon/nutrient balance. In: Mattson WJ, Levieux J, Bernard-Dagan C (eds) Mechanisms of woody plant defenses against insects: search for pattern. Springer, New York, pp 57–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Dam NM, Baldwin IT (2001) Competition mediates costs of jasmonate-induced defences, nitrogen acquisition and transgenerational plasticity in Nicotiana attenuata. Funct Ecol 15:406–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meijden E (1996) Plant defence, an evolutionary dilemma: contrasting effects of (specialist and generalist) herbivores and natural enemies. Entomol Exp Appl 80:307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meijden E, Wijn M, Verkaar HJ (1988) Defense and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51:355–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verges A, Perez M, Alcoverro T et al (2008) Compensation and resistance to herbivory in seagrasses: induced responses to simulated consumption by fish. Oecologia 155:751–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wurst S, van Dam NM, Monroy F et al (2008) Intraspecific variation in plant defense alters effects of root herbivores on leaf chemistry and aboveground herbivore damage. J Chem Ecol 34:1360–1367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR (1997) Cost of chemically defending seeds: furanocoumarins and Pastinaca sativa. Am Nat 150:491–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zavala JA, Baldwin IT (2006) Jasmonic acid signalling and herbivore resistance traits constrain regrowth after herbivore attack in Nicotiana attenuata. Plant Cell Environ 29:1751–1760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank E. van der Meijden for his constructive comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. L. Reudler Talsma and R. M. Niermeyer are acknowledged for their help with weighing and grinding of the samples and Francesca Rinaldi for her help with the HPLC- analyses. This study was supported by a grant from the Earth and Life Science Foundation (ALW) of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). Publication 5342 Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. H. Reudler.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 35 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reudler, J.H., Honders, S.C., Turin, H. et al. Trade-offs between chemical defence and regrowth capacity in Plantago lanceolata . Evol Ecol 27, 883–898 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-012-9609-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-012-9609-8

Keywords

Navigation