Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adaptation of institutional arrangements to management of Northern Rangelands of Kenya

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Northern Rangelands of Kenya have continued to grapple with management challenges largely due to a lack of understanding of the dynamics thereof. Eroding customary institutions and new institutional arrangements characterize the system suggesting that adaptation is taking place to cope with the change. It is imperative that these socio-ecosystems adjust to the disturbance without disintegrating into a different state that is controlled by a different set of processes to ensure sustainable rangeland management. To understand the nature of change, the study sought to evaluate institutional arrangements engaged in tackling growing socio-economic and ecological factors challenging development within the last decade. Three study sites namely Kinna, Makurian and Westgate, representing three types of institutional arrangements (elders only, group ranch committee and community conservancy board), were investigated. Key informants, focused group discussions and household survey methods were used to gather data. Data were managed and analysed using Ms Access, Ms Excel, social network analysis and SPSS. Findings indicate that more actors (internal and external) are engaging in management of social economic and ecological factors challenging development within the last decade. The co-management approach allows increased capacity to tackle these challenges and further presents more opportunities for a diversified livelihood, two key features of ecosystem resilience. Findings are useful as the Kenya government implements the National Land Policy that recognizes the need to restructure community land and its management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Resilience is defined as the capacity of an ecosystem to cope with disturbance without disintegrating into a different state that is controlled by a different set of processes.

  2. Social-ecological resilience is the capacity of linked social-ecological systems to handle disturbance while maintaining the capacity for adaptation, learning and transformation (Folke et al. 2010).

  3. “In Garbatulla, a local NGO Resource Advocacy Program (RAP) is working with local communities and the local government to document relevant customary laws on natural resource management among the Boran. Kenyan laws have provisions for incorporation of these by-laws, and once the Minister gazettes the laws it will form part of the legal system.”

References

  • Bahadur, A. V., Ibrahim, M., & Tanner, T. (2010). The resilience renaissance? Unpacking of resilience for tackling climate change and disasters: Strengthening climate resilience discussion paper 1. UK: Institute of Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, L., & Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75, 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R., & Gunderson, L. H. (2001). Coping with collapse: Ecological and social dynamics in ecosystem management. BioScience, 51, 451–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crona, B. (2006). Supporting and enhancing development of heterogeneous ecological knowledge among resource users in a Kenyan seascape. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S., & Walker, B. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Institute of Resource Ecology: University of British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. (2003). Resilience defined. Entry prepared for the Internet encyclopedia of ecological economics. International Society of Ecological Economics.

  • Israel, G. D. (2009). Determining sample size. Gainesville: Program Evaluation and Organizational Development (PEOD), Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS), University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. A. (1998). Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems, 1, 431–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcpeak, J. G., Doss, C. R., Barrett, C. B., & Kristjanson, P. (2009). Do community members share development priorities? Results of a ranking exercise in East African Rangelands. The Journal of Development Studies, 45(10), 1663–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadasdy, P. (2003). The politics of resilience. In D. Armitage, F. Berkes, & N. Doubleday (Eds.), Adaptive co-management: Learning, collaboration and multi-level governance. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odhiambo, M. O. (2013). Releasing our full potential: The ASAL policy, its promise and challenges. A briefing note for members of county assemblies, community representatives, leaders, CSO and ASAL stakeholders. Nakuru: Reconcile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, E. (1989). Attaining better fisheries management through co-management prospects, problems and propositions. In E. Pinkerton (Ed.), Co-operative management of local fisheries: New direction in improved management and community development (pp. 3–33). Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sombroek, W. C., Braun, H. M. H., & van der Pouw, B. J. A. (1982). Explanatory soil map and agro-climatic zone map of Kenya. Report E1. National Agricultural Laboratories, Soil Survey Unit, Nairobi, Kenya, 56 pp.

  • UNOCHA. (2009). Kenya: Humanitarian situation. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. November 2009.

  • USAID. (2010). Enhanced livelihoods in Mandera triangle/enhanced livelihoods in Southern Ethiopia newsletter. Nairobi: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, C. (2012). Social ecological resilience and planning an interdisciplinary exploration. Stockholm: Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Karwitha Kanyuuru.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanyuuru, C.K., Mburu, J. & Njoka, J. Adaptation of institutional arrangements to management of Northern Rangelands of Kenya. Environ Dev Sustain 19, 67–82 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9718-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9718-y

Keywords

Navigation