Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecological footprint of paperboard and paper production unit in India

  • Case Study
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is important to evaluate the performance of industries in a growing economy like India through responsible resource use assessments. The article estimates ecological footprint (EF) to communicate the environmental effects of a paperboard and paper production unit in India based on information collected through face-to-face interview method. EF has been calculated by adopting component or bottom-up approach taking into consideration all the components of EF (land, energy, freight and employees transport, water, materials and wastes). Results show that the total EF for production and allied activities of the case study unit varies between 5,62,845 and 2,15,564 ha and EF per tonne of production varying between 23.61 and 9.03 ha. This is based on the production of 23,828 Mt of output of specialty and tissues paper, and the variation occurs due to higher and lower conversion factor for materials and water. The hotspots of EF are energy, materials and wastes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arabindo, P. (2006). Neighbourhood transformations in Peri-Urban Chennai. In V. Dupont, & N. Sridharan (Eds.), Peri urban dynamics: Case studies in Chennai, Hyderabad and Mumbai. CSH occasional paper no. 17, New Delhi.

  • Barret, J., & Scott, A. (2001). The ecological footprint: A metric for corporate sustainability. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 8, 316–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J., Vallack, H., Jones, A., & Haq, G. (2002). A material flow analysis and ecological footprint of York. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • BFF. (2002). City limits: A resource flow and ecological footprint analysis of greater London. Biffaward programme on sustainable resource use. Best Foot Forward, Oxford.www.citylimitslondon.com.

  • Burte, H., & Krishnankutty, M. (2006). On the edge: Planning, describing and imagining the sea side edge of Mumbai. In V. DuPont, & N. Sridharan (Eds.), Peri Urban dynamics: Case studies in Chennai, Hyderabad and Mumbai. CSH occasional paper No.17, New Delhi.

  • Chambers, N., Simmons, C., & Wackernagel, M. (2000). Sharing nature’s interest: Ecological footprints as an indicator of sustainability. U.K.: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., Chen, G. Q., Yang, Z. F., & Jiang, M. M. (2007). Ecological footprint accounting for energy and resources in China. Energy Policy, 35, 1599–1609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, V., & Sinclaier, J. A. (2002). Measuring the ecological footprint of a himalayan tourist center. Mountain Research and Development, 22(2), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, B., Reed, A., Galli, A., Kitzes, J., & Wackernagel, M. (2010). Calculation methodology for the national footprint accounts. Oakland: Global Footprint Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanafiah, M. M., Hendriks, A. J., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2012). Comparing the ecological footprint with the biodiversity footprint of products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37, 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanafiah, M. M., Huijbregts, M., & Hendriks, J. (2010). The influence of nutrients and non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions on the ecological footprint of products. Sustainability, 2, 963–979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts, M. A. J., Hellweg, S., Frischknecht, R., Hungerbuhler, K., & Hendriks, A. J. (2008). Ecological footprint accounting in the life cycle assessment of products. Ecological Economics, 64, 798–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, M., Fix, J., & Rees, W. E. (2007). Wood and non-wood pulp production: a comparative eco-footprint analysis of alternative paper-pulp manufacturing on the Canadian prairies. Ecological Economics, 62, 552–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, H. D., (2013). Pulp and paper industry raw material scenario-ITC plantation a case study. IIPTA, 25(1), 79–90.

  • Lenzen, M. (2003). Environmentally important paths, linkages and key sectors in the Australian economy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, M., Murray, S., & Shama, A. (2001). A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia. Ecological Economics, 37, 229–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G. J., Wang, GU, X. W., Liu, J. X., Ding, Y., & Liang, G. Y. (2008). Application of the componential method for ecological footprint calculation of a Chinese university campus. Ecological Indicators, 8, 75–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyndhurst, B. (2003). London’s ecological footprint: A review. London: GLA Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Loone, A., Yvonne, R., Bernadette, O. R., & Richard, M. (2008). An environmental performance assessment and ecological footprint analysis of SMEs in the Mid–West Region. Paper presented at the CRCC conference 2008, Queens University, Belfast.

  • McDonald, G., Patterson, W., & Murray, G. (2004). Ecological footprints and interdependencies of New Zealand regions. Ecological Economics, 50, 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munshi, T. (2007). Urban form and the ecological footprint of Transport-A case of Ahmedabad City, India. Project prepared and is to be conducted by International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede, the Netherlands and CEPT University, Ahmadabad, India.

  • Simmons, C., & Chambers, N. (1998). Footprinting U.K. households: How big is your ecological garden? Local Environment, 3(3), 3655–3662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, C., Lewis, K., & Barrett, J. (2000). Two Feet-two approaches: A component-based model of ecological footprinting. Ecological Economics, 32, 375–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonak, S. (2004). Ecological footprint of production: A tool to assess environmental impacts of tourism activity. The Journal of Tourism Studies, 15(2), 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thattai, D. V., Muralidharan, R., & Karthick, A. (2007). Ecological footprint calculation for a college campus in Southern India. ESA/SER joint meeting, San Jose McEnergy Convention Centre, San Jose, CA.

  • Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Erbb, K. H., Haberlb, H., & Schulzb, N. B. (2004). Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961–1999: Comparing the conventional approach to an ‘actual land area’ approach. Land Use Policy, 21, 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., OnistoL, Bello P., Linares, A. C., Falfan, I. S. L., Garcia, J. M., Guerrero, A. I. S., et al. (1999). National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 29, 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. E. (1996). Our ecological footprint. Reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC.

  • Weidmann, T., & Barrett, J. (2010). A review of the ecological footprint indicator—Perceptions and methods. Sustainability, 2, 1645–1693. doi:10.3390/su2061645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thankfully acknowledge University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India, for funding this work under Project Reference F. PHW-048/10-11 (ERO) dated 21.10.2010. We also acknowledge with thanks the anonymous referees for their encouraging and valuable observations on the earlier versions of the paper. The support rendered by Ms. Shyamasree Dasgupta, Research Scholar, Dept. of Economics, Jadavpur University is also highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Commerce, Netaji Nagar College, 170/436, N, S.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, 700092, India

    Debrupa Chakraborty

  2. Department of Economics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, India

    Joyashree Roy

Authors
  1. Debrupa Chakraborty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joyashree Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debrupa Chakraborty.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (rtf 250 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakraborty, D., Roy, J. Ecological footprint of paperboard and paper production unit in India. Environ Dev Sustain 17, 909–921 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9563-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9563-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation