Skip to main content
Log in

Oil palm plantation investments in Indonesia’s forest frontiers: limited economic multipliers and uncertain benefits for local communities

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the implications of oil palm estate development in Indonesia’s frontier province of Papua. Government planners believe that oil palm investment will develop the local economy, create jobs and reduce poverty. Using the input–output approach, we find that, in aggregate terms, oil palm investments boost the economic output in the province, generate jobs and increase worker salaries. However, the oil palm subsector operates in isolation and has limited economic multipliers. The number of jobs is potentially large, but those best positioned to benefit from them are mostly skilled migrants, not local poor. The government should reduce the size of plantation investments and plan their implementation as part of a broader development package to allow greater economic integration and skill acquisition by local communities. The priority areas for plantation development should be degraded, non-forest land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous. (2011). Govt to spend Rp 1t to start Papua food estate project, Jakarta Post. 25 January, http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/01/25/govt-spend-rp-1t-start-papua-food-estate-project.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2011.

  • Antara News. (2012). RI’s CPO production in 2012 projected at 25 million tons. 4 January. http://www.antaranews.com/en/news/78902/ris-cpo-production-in-2012-projected-at-25-million-tons (17 June, 2012).

  • Bahroeny, J. J. (2009). Palm oil as an economic pillar of Indonesia. Jakarta Post, 2, December, http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/12/02/palm-oil-economic-pillar-indonesia.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2011.

  • Bank Indonesia. (2013). Indonesian financial statistics November 2013. Bank Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

  • Barbier, E. B. (2003). The role of natural resources in economic development. Australian Economic Papers, 42(2), 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. (2004). Explaining agricultural land expansion and deforestation in developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(5), 1347–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. (2005). Frontier expansion and economic development. Contemporary Economic Policy, 23(2), 286–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. (2007). Frontiers and sustainable economic development. Environmental & Resource Economics, 37(1), 271–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. (2012a). Scarcity, frontiers and development. The Geographical Journal, 178, 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. (2012b). Corruption, poverty and tropical land use. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 31(4–5), 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellu, L. G. (2011). Development and development paradigms: A (reasoned) review of prevailing visions. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.

  • Berck, P., & Hoffmann, S. (2002). Assessing the employment impacts of environmental and natural resource policy. Environmental & Resource Economics, 22, 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, D., Elias, P., Lininger, K., May-Tobin, C., Roquemore, S., & Saxon, E. (2011). The root of the problem: What’s driving tropical deforestation today? Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Cambridge.

  • Bisnis Indonesia. (2010a). Papua Sepakati Area Food Estate. 16 August.

  • Bisnis Indonesia. (2010b). Menhut: Area Food Estate Hanya 0.5 Juta ha. 16 August.

  • BPS. (2000). Teknik Penyusunan Tabel Input-Output. Jakarta: Central Statistics Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • BPS. (2008a). Keadaan Pekerja di Indonesia Hasil Survey Angkatan Kerja Nasional (Sakernas) Tahun 2008. Jakarta: Central Statistics Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • BPS. (2008b). Pengeluaran Untuk Konsumsi Penduduk Indonesia Tahun 2008 Berdasarkan Hasil Susenas Panel Maret 2008. Jakarta: Central Statistics Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • BPS. (2009). Data Ketenagakerjaan Provinsi Papua Tahun 2006–2009. Jayapura: Central Statistics Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • BPS Provinsi Papua. (2012). Provinsi Papua dalam Angka 2011. Jayapura: Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Papua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruntse-Dahl, R. (2011). Malaysia and Indonesia bolster defense of palm oil industry to West. The Guardian, 20 May, http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/may/20/malaysia-indonesia-palm-oil-defence. Accessed 20 Dec 2011.

  • Bunyamin, B. (2008). Dampak pengembangan PIR kelapa sawit terhadap perekonomian regional Kalimantan Barat. Pontianak: Untan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee, D., Diao, X., & Jackson, C. (2005). Agriculture, rural development and pro-poor growth: Country experiences in the post-reform era. Agriculture and rural development discussion paper 21, 20–21. World Bank, Washington, DC.

  • Casson, A., Tacconi, L., & Deddy, K. (2007). Strategies to reduce carbon emissions from the oil palm sector in Indonesia. CIFOR working paper 62. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

  • Cella, G. (1984). The input–output measurement of inter-industry linkages. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 46(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, B. J., & Rossi, J. W. (1991). Inter-industry linkages and economic development: The case of Brazil reconsidered. The Developing Economics, 29(2), 167–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colchester, M. (2010). Land acquisition, human rights violations and indigenous peoples on the palm oil frontier. London: Forest Peoples Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colchester, M., & Chao, S. (2011). Oil palm expansion in South East Asia: Trends and implications for local communities and indigenous peoples. London: Forest Peoples Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs. (2011). Master plan for acceleration and expansion of Indonesia economic development. Jakarta: Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinas Perkebunan Provinsi Papua. (2007). Perkembangan Luas Areal dan Produksi Sawit Provinsi Papua. www.papua.go.id (5 July 2011).

  • Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan. (2011). Luas Areal dan Produksi Kelapa Sawit Indonesia 19672010. http://ditjenbun.deptan.go.id/cigraph/index.php/viewstat/komoditiutama/8-Kelapa%20Sawit (12 December 2011).

  • Down to Earth (DTE). (2008). Save our people and forests, say Papuans. Down to Earth 78, August.

  • Elson, D. (2009). Palm oil business models for land use and development planning in Indonesia: Report prepared for the Indonesian National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas). Jakarta, Indonesia.

  • Feintrenie, L., Chong, W. K., & Levang, P. (2010). Why do farmers prefer oil palm? Lessons learnt from Bungo district, Indonesia. Small Scale Forestry, 9(3), 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzherbert, E. B., Struebig, M. J., Morel, A., Danielsen, F., Brühl, C. A., Donald, P. F., et al. (2008). How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(10), 538–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2009). From land grab to win–win. Economic and social perspectives. Policy brief 4, June 2009. FAO, Rome.

  • Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS). (2009). Indonesia: Rising global demand fuels palm oil expansion. Commodity intelligence report, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

  • Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS). (2010). Indonesia: Palm oil production growth to continue. Commodity intelligence report. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

  • Gibbs, H. K., Ruesch, A. S., Achard, F., Clayton, M. K., Holmgren, P., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (2010). Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, pp 16732–16737.

  • Hadianto, A. (2010). Analisis Pertumbuhan Sektor Berbasis Kehutanan dan Dampaknya Terhadap Distribusi Pendapatan dan Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja di Indonesia: Pendekatan Analisis Input-Output Miyazawa. MSc Thesis, Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia.

  • Hafizrianda, Y. (2007). Dampak Pembangunan Sektor Pertanian Terhadap Distribusi Pendapatan dan Perekonomian Regional Provinsi Papua: Suatu Analisis Model Sistem Neraca Sosial Ekonomi. Ph.D. thesis, Bogor Agricultural Institute, Indonesia.

  • Hanapi, M. F. (2013). 3.7 juta penduduk Indonesia hidup dari sawit. Antaranews, 29 March 2013.

  • Indonesia Business Today (2013). Papua butuh pabrik pengolah CPO. 3 September 2013. http://www.tender-indonesia.com/tender_home/innerNews2.php?id=20885&cat=CT0015.

  • International Finance Corporation (IFC). (2011). The World Bank Group framework and IFC strategy for engagement in the palm oil sector. Washington, DC: IFC and the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelsma, I., Giller, K., & Fairhurst, T. (2009) Smallholder oil palm production systems in Indonesia: Lessons from the NESP Ophir project. Report by the Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen. Wageningen University, The Netherlands.

  • Kontan (2011). Misi Investasi Di Tanah Papua, 14 April, p. 36–37.

  • Lee, J. S. H., Abood, S., Ghazoul, J., Barus, B., Obidzinski, K., & Koh, L. P. (2013). Environmental impacts of large-scale oil palm enterprises exceed that of smallholdings in Indonesia. Conservation Letters,. doi:10.1111/conl.12039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, M., & Schaeffer, R. (2004) Interrelational income distribution in Brazil. The Developing Economies XLII–3: 371–391.

  • Majalah Tropis (2010) Ketika Food Estate Digulirkan, Ekonomi dan Konservasi. No 3, March, Jakarta, Indonesia.

  • Mani, H., Bhalachandran, G., & Pandit, V. N. (2011) Public investment in agricultural and GDP growth—another look at the inter sectoral linkages and policy implications. Working paper 201. Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics, India.

  • Manurung, E. G. T. (2001). Analisis valuasi ekonomi investasi perkebunan kelapa sawit di Indonesia. Jakarta: Natural Resource Management Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. J., & Beehler, B. M. (2007). The ecology of Papua: Part one. Singapore: Periplus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti, S. (2008) Losing ground: The human rights impacts of oil palm plantation expansion in Indonesia. Friend of the Earth, Life Mosaic and Sawit Watch, London.

  • McCann, P. (2001). Urban and regional economics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. F., Gillespie, P., & Zen, Z. (2011). Swimming upstream: Local Indonesian production networks. World Development, 40(3), 555–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, J., Shi, C., & Liew, S. C. (2011). Deforestation rates in insular Southeast Asia between 2000 and 2010. Global Change Biology, 17, 2261–2270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, J., Hooijer, A., Shi, C., Tollenaar, D., Vernimmen, R., Liew, S. C., et al. (2012). Extent of industrial plantations on Southeast Asian Peatlands in 2010 with analysis of historical expansion and future projections. Glob Change Biology Bioenergy, 4(6), 908–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture. (2005). Prospek Pengembangan dan Perkiraan Kebutuhan Investasi Pertanian di Indonesia. Centre of Socio-economic Studies, Research and Development Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesia.

  • Ministry of Agriculture. (2011). Investment profiles of agricultural sector in some region in Indonesia [sic]. Jakarta: Ministry of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture. (2013). Implementasi proyeek-proyek berbasis lahan MP3EI koridor ekonomi 6 Papua-Kepulauan Maluku (Sub Koridor Papua): Kemajuan, Peluang dan Tantangan. http://www.redd-indonesia.org/pdf/seminar/Merauke/04_Kementan_MIFEE.pdf.

  • Ministry of Forestry. (2012). Statistik Kehutanan 2011. Jakarta: Ministry of Forestry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa, K. (1976) Input-output analysis and the structure of income distribution (Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 116). Springer, Heidelberg.

  • Obidzinski, K., Andriani, R., Komarudin, H., & Andrianto, A. (2012) Environmental and social impacts of oil palm plantations and their implications for biofuel production in Indonesia. Ecology and Society 16(3): 25–43. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/issues/view.php?sf=68.

  • Pahan, I. (2010). Kelapa Sawit: Manajemen Agribisnis dari Hulu hingga Hilir. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papua Regional Promotion and Investment Board (BPID). (2007). Daya Tarik Investasi Papua Masih Rendah. Jayapura: BPID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardamean, M. (2011). Sukses Membuka Kebun dan Pabrik Kelapa Sawit. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, L. (2008). Dayak resistance to oil palm plantation in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Paper to the 17th biennial conference of the Asian studies association of Australia, Melbourne, 1–3 July.

  • Republik Indonesia. (2011). Masterplan percepatan dan perluasan pembangunan ekonomi Indonesia 2011–2025. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian and Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia.

  • Rist, L., Feintrenie, L., & Levang, P. (2010). The livelihood impacts of oil palm: Smallholders in Indonesia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(4), 1009–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheil, D., Casson, A., Meijaard, E., van Nordwijk, M., Gaskell, J., Sunderland-Groves, J., Wertz, K., & Kanninen, M. (2009). The impacts and opportunities of oil palm in Southeast Asia: What do we know and what do we need to know? CIFOR Occasional Paper 51. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

  • Sirait, G. M., Tampubolon, L. H., Sare, F. Y., Widodo, A., & Oktora, I. (2010). Budaya dan Tanah Adat Orang Moni di Distrik Sugapa. Jakarta: PKPM-Atma Jaya Catholic University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slette, J. P., & Wiyono, I. E. (2011). Oilseeds and products update 2011 USDA Foreign Agriculture Service, Jakarta, Indonesia.

  • Sonis, M., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2001). An expanded Miyazawa framework: Labour and capital income, savings, consumption and investment links. In D. Felsenstein, R. McQuaid, P. McCann, & D. Shefer (Eds.), Public investment and regional economic development. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suebu, B. (2009). A global solution: Building a low-carbon economy for Papua province, Indonesia. Papua provincial government, Jayapura, Indonesia. Unpublished report.

  • Suparno, R., & Afrida, N. (2009). RI to expand oil palm estates amid environmental concerns. Jakarta Post, 3 December, http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/12/03/ri-expand-oil-palm-estates-amid-environmental-concerns.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2011.

  • Susila, W. R. (2004). Contribution of oil palm industry to economic growth and poverty alleviation in Indonesia. Journal Litbang Pertanian, 23(3), 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempo. (2013). Hutan Papua berpotensi untuk kebun sawit. 14 January.

  • West, G. R. (1993). Input-output analysis for practitioners. Department of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

  • Willebald, H. (2011). Land abundance, frontier expansion and the hypothesis of appropriability revisited from an historical perspective. Paper to the first quantitative agricultural and natural resources history workshop, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain, 2–3 June.

  • World Bank. (2005). Agricultural growth for the poor: An agenda for development. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank, Washington, DC.

  • World Bank. (2008). World development report 2008: Agriculture for development. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank, Washington, DC.

  • World Bank. (2010). Environmental, economic and social impacts of oil palm in Indonesia: A synthesis of opportunities and challenges. Jakarta: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Growth. (2011). The economic benefit of palm oil to Indonesia. Arlington: World Growth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulan, Y. C., Yasmi, Y., Purba, C., & Wollenberg, E. (2004). Analisa konflik sektor kehutanan di Indonesia 1997–2003. Bogor: CIFOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasmi, Y., Schanz, H., & Salim, A. (2006). Manifestation of conflict escalation in natural resource management. Environmental Science & Policy, 9, 538–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Data collection and analysis for this paper were carried out with support from CORDAID of the Netherlands, USAID RDMA project ‘Economic choices and tradeoffs to REDD + in Asia’ and the DFID project ‘Emerging countries in transition to green economy: will it make a difference for forests and people?’. The authors would like to express their gratitude for the financial support received and convey their thanks to project partners in Papua for their participation and willingness to share data. Special thanks are due to Sophia Gnych for painstaking review and editing of this manuscript. The drafting of this paper was initiated during a sabbatical leave at the University of Wageningen in the Netherlands. The hospitality of the Rural Development Sociology is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krystof Obidzinski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Obidzinski, K., Dermawan, A. & Hadianto, A. Oil palm plantation investments in Indonesia’s forest frontiers: limited economic multipliers and uncertain benefits for local communities. Environ Dev Sustain 16, 1177–1196 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9519-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9519-8

Keywords

Navigation