Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Frontiers and sustainable economic development

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exploiting new resource “frontiers,” such as agricultural land and mineral reserves, is a fundamental feature of economic development in poor economies. Yet frontier-based development is symptomatic of a pattern of economy-wide resource exploitation in developing economies that: (a) generates little additional economic rents, and (b) what rents are generated are not being reinvested in other sectors. Such development is inherently unsustainable. The following paper explains this phenomenon, and provides evidence that long-run expansion of agricultural land and oil and natural gas proved reserves across poor economies is associated with lower levels of real income per capita. The paper proposes a frontier expansion hypothesis to explain why the structural economic dependence of these economies on frontier land expansion and resource exploitation is not conducive to sustained long-run growth. The key to sustainable economic development in poor economies will be improving the economic integration between frontier and other sectors of the economy, targeting policies to improved resource management in frontier areas and overcoming problems of corruption and rent-seeking in resource sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alston LJ, Gary DL, Mueller B (1999) Titles, conflict, and land use: the development of property rights and land reform on the Brazilian Amazon frontier. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

  • Ascher W (1999). Why governments waste natural resources: policy failures in developing countries. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Baland J-M and Plateau J-P (1996). Halting degradation: is there a role for rural communities. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH and Khanti-Akon S (1990). Replicating the results in ‘an efficient estimation with panel data: an empirical comparison of instrumental variables estimators’. J Appl Econom 5: 401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB (2003). The role of natural resources in economic development. Aust Econ Papers 42(2): 259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB (2004). Explaining agricultural land expansion and deforestation in developing countries. Am J Agric Econ 86(5): 1347–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB (2005a). Frontier expansion and economic development. Contemp Econ Policy 23(2): 286–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB (2005b) Natural resources and economic development. Cambridge University Press

  • Barbier EB, Damania R and Léonard D (2005). Corruption, trade and resource conversion. J Environ Econ Manage 50: 276–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billington RA (1966). America’s frontier heritage. Holt Reinhart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger HP and Deininger K (1997). Explaining agricultural and agrarian policies in developing countries. J Econ Liter 35: 1958–2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop RC (1993). Econ efficiency, sustainability and biodiversity. Ambio 22(2–3): 69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley DW (1989). Property relations and economic development: the other land reform. World Develop 17: 867–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley DW (1991). Environment and economy: property rights and public policy. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers EJ and Gordon DF (1966). Primary products and economic growth: an empirical measurement. J Polit Econ 74(4): 315–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla CM (1976). Before the industrial revolution: European society and economy, 1000–1700. Metheun, London

    Google Scholar 

  • David PA and Wright G (1997). Increasing returns and the genesis of American resource abundance. Indust Corporate Change 6: 203–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis GA (1995). Learning to love the dutch disease: evidence from the mineral economies. World Develop 23(1): 1765–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon RT (1999). Deforestation and ownership: evidence from historical accounts and contemporary data. Land Econ 75(3): 341–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • di Tella G (1982) The economics of the frontier. In: Kindleberger CP, di Tella G (eds) Economics in the long view. Macmillan, London, pp 210–227

    Google Scholar 

  • di Fairhead J (2001). The conflict over natural and environmental resources. In: Nafziger, EW, Stewart, F and Väyrynen, R (eds) War, hunger, and displacement: the origins of humanitarian emergencies, vol 1: analysis, pp 147–178. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay R (1995). Factor proportions, trade and growth. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay R and Lundahl M (1994). Natural resources, ‘Vent-for-Surplus’ and the staples theory. In: Meier, G (eds) From classical economics to development economics: essays in honor of Hla Myint, pp 68–93. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay R, Lundahl M (1999) Resource-led growth – A long-term perspective: the relevance of the 1870–1914 experience for today’s developing economies. UNU/WIDER Working Papers No. 162. World Institute for Development Economics Research, Helsinki.

  • Fischer G and Heilig GK (1997). Population momentum and the demand on land and water resources. Philos Trans Royal Soc Series B 352(1356): 869–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (1995) World agriculture: towards 2010 – an FAO study. FAO and John Wiley & Sons, Rome and New York

  • Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2001) Forest resources assessment 2000: main report. FAO Forestry Paper 140, Rome

  • Gylfason T (2001). Nature, power and growth. Scot J Political Econ 48(5): 558–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen B (1979). Colonial economic development with unlimited supply of land: a ricardian case. Econ Develop Cultural Change 27: 611–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick J (1977). Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources. Am Econ Rev 67: 972–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe CW (1979). Natural resource economics: issues, analysis and policy. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon TF (1999). Environment, scarcity and violence. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman JA and Taylor WE (1981). Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrics 49(6): 1377–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonegran SC (1999). Environmental change, adaptation and security. NATO ASI series. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • López R (1998). Where development can or cannot go: the role of poverty-environment linkages. In: Pleskovic, B and Stiglitz, JE (eds) Annual bank conference on development economics (1997), pp 285–306. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäler K-G (1995). Economic growth and the environment. In: Perrings, CA, Mäler, K-G, Folke, C, Holling, CS and Jansson, B-O (eds) Biodiversity loss: economic and ecological issues, pp 213–224. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehlum H, Moene K and Torvik R (2006). Institutions and the resource curse. Econ J 116: 1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf GE (1996). Specification testing in panel data with instrumental variables. J Econom 71: 291–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myint H (1958). The classical theory of international trade and the underdeveloped countries. Econ J 68: 315–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW and Barbier EB (2000). Blueprint for a sustainable economy. Earthscan Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW, Barbier EB and Markandya A (1990). Sustainable development: economics and environment in the third world. Edward Elgar, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW, Markandya A and Barbier EB (1989). Blueprint for a green economy. Earthscan Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzey JCV (1989). Economic analysis of sustainable growth and sustainable development. Environment Department Working Paper No. 15. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik D, Subramanian A and Trebbi F (2004). Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. J Econ Growth 9: 131–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez F and Sachs JD (1999). Why do resource-abundant economies grow more slowly. J Econ Growth 4: 277–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1996). Why, indeed, in America? Theory, history and the origins of modern economic growth. Am Econ Rev 86(2): 202–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs JD and Warner AM (1997). Fundamental sources of long-run growth. Am Econ Rev 87(2): 184–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs JD and Warner AM (2001). The curse of natural resources. Euro Econ Rev 45: 827–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith S (1976). An extension of the vent-for-surplus model in relation to long-run structural change in Nigeria. Oxford Econ Papers 28(3): 426–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1974). Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Rev Econ Stud Symposium on the Economics of Exhaustible Resources 41: 29–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1993). Sustainability: an economist’s perspective. In: Dorfman, R and Dorfman, NS (eds) Economics of the environment: selected readings, 3rd edn, pp 179–187. W.W. Norton & company, New york

    Google Scholar 

  • Southey C (1978). The staples thesis, common property and homesteading. Can J Econ 11(3): 547–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain A (2001). Water scarcity as a source of crisis. In: Nafziger, EW, Stewart, F and Väyrynen, R (eds) War, hunger, and displacement: the origins of humanitarian emergencies. Volume 1: analysis, pp 179–206. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas V, Dailami M, Dhareshwar A, Kaufmann D, Kishor N, López R and Wang Y (2000). The quality of growth. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tornell A and Lane PR (2001). Are windfalls a curse?. J Int Econ 44: 83–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torvik R (2002). Natural resources, rent seeking and welfare. J Develop Econ 67: 455–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner FJ (1986). The significance of the frontier in American history. In: Turner, FJ (eds) The frontier in American history, pp 1–38. University of Arizona Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins MH (1963). A staple theory of economic growth. Can J Econ Political Sci 29(2): 141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb WP (1964). The great frontier. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2003). World development report 2003. World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Wright G (1990). The origins of american industrial success, 1879–1940. Am Econ Rev 80(4): 651–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright G and Czelusta J (2002). Exorcizing the resource curse: minerals as a knowledge industry, past and present. Mimeo. Department of Economics, Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunder S (2003). Oil wealth and the fate of the forest: a comparative study of eight tropical countries. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward B. Barbier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbier, E.B. Frontiers and sustainable economic development. Environ Resource Econ 37, 271–295 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9120-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9120-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation