Abstract
A common theme in accounts of choosing mathematics is that of persistence in the face of troubles or difficulties which are often associated with the structuring effects of gender, class, culture and ethnicity. Centring on an analysis of one woman’s account of becoming a mathematician, we build on our understanding of multiple and developing identities with the aim of capturing the nature of individual challenge to structuring discourses and its implications for choice and participation in mathematics more generally. Inspecting how she talks about events in the past, present, and future, we expand on Leont’ev’s (1978, 1981) notion of leading activity to explore how we organise and prioritise activities (and their related identities) within the context of Holland et al.’s (1998) theory of identity in practice, hybridity and world-making. We interrogate the part played by contradiction in creating a space for individual agency through its resolution in hybrid practices and its relation to social change, exploring how our informant narrates taking up mathematics “against the odds” as part of an ongoing process of “re-writing” herself into new imagined worlds. In providing an insight into how one individual envisages and enacts a different mathematics culture in which she can have a place, our analysis suggests ways forward in creating new, more inclusive, mathematics education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A figured world is “a socially and culturally constructed realm of interpretation in which particular characters and actors are recognised, significance is assigned to certain acts, and particular outcomes are valued over others” (Holland et al., 1998, p.52)
References
Apple, M. W. (2012). Can education change society? New York, NY: Routledge.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference. New York: Basic Books.
Beach, K. (2003). Consequential transitions: A developmental view of knowledge propagation through social organisations. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 39-62). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Becker, J. R. (1995). Women’s ways of knowing in mathematics. In G. Kaiser & P. Rogers (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture (pp. 163–174). London: Falmer.
Black, L. (2004a). Differential participation in whole-class discussions and the construction of marginalised identities. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(1), 34–54.
Black, L. (2004b). Teacher–pupil talk in whole-class discussions and processes of social positioning within the primary school classroom. Language and Education, 18(5), 347–360.
Black, L., & Williams, J. (2013). Contradiction and conflict between “leading identities”: Becoming an engineer versus becoming a “good Muslim” woman. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1), 1–14.
Black, L., Williams, J., Hernandez-Martines, P., Davis, P., & Wake, G. (2010). Developing a “Leading Identity”: The relationship between students’ mathematical identities and their career and higher education aspirations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(1), 55–72.
Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171–200). Westport, CT: Alex.
DfE (2013). First statistical release Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/251184/SFR40_2013_FINALv2.pdf.
Forgasz, H., Becker, J. R., Lee, K.-H., & Steinthorsdottir, O. (Eds.). (2010). International perspectives on gender and mathematics education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Forgasz, H., & Rivera, F. (2012). Towards equity in mathematics education: gender, culture, and diversity. Dordrecht: Springer.
Guitierrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tajeda, C. (1999). Re-thinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303.
Gutierrez, K. (2008). Developing a socio-critical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.
Gutiérrez, R., & Gutierrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68.
Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.
Hall, J. (2010). The influence of high school and university experiences on women’s pursuit of undergraduate mathematics degrees in Canada. In H. Forgasz, J. R. Becker, K.-H. Lee, & O. Steinthorsdottir (Eds.), International perspectives on gender and mathematics education (pp. 365–389). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Holland, D., & Lachicotte, W. (2007). Vygotsky, Mead and the new sociocultural studies of identity. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 101–135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Joint Council for Qualifications (2013). Entry trends, gender and regional charts GCE 2013 Retrieved from http://www.jcq.org.uk/media-centre/news-releases/entry-trends-gender-regional-charts-gce-2013.
Kaiser, G., & Rogers, P. (1995). Introduction: equity in mathematics education. In P. Rogers & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture (pp. 1-10). London: Routledge.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The development of mind. Retrieved from www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/development-mind.pdf.
London Mathematical Society (2013). Advancing women in mathematics: Good practice in UK university departments Retrieved from http://www.blitzadv.co.uk/LMS-BTL-17Report.pdf.
Mendick, H. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing “good at maths”. Gender and Education, 17(2), 203–219.
Mendick, H., Moreau, M.-P. & Hollingworth, S. (2008). Mathematical images and gender identities. Report for UK resource centre for women in science, engineering and technology Bradford: UKRC.
Pais, A. (2014). Economy: The absent centre of mathematics education. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46, 1085–1093.
Rodd, M., & Bartholomew, H. (2006). Invisible and special: Young women’s experiences as undergraduate mathematics students. Gender and Education, 18(1), 35–50.
Skovsmose, O., & Greer, B. (2012). Opening the cage: Critique and politics of mathematics education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Solomon, Y. (2007). Not belonging? What makes a functional learner identity in the undergraduate mathematics community of practice? Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 79–96.
Solomon, Y. (2012). Finding a voice? Narrating the female self in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 171–183.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Walls, F. (2009). Mathematical subjects: Children talk about their mathematics lives. Dordrecht: Springer.
WISE (2012). Women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: From classroom to boardroom Retrieved from http://www.wisecampaign.org.uk/files/useruploads/files/wise_stats_document_final.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solomon, Y., Radovic, D. & Black, L. “I can actually be very feminine here”: contradiction and hybridity in becoming a female mathematician. Educ Stud Math 91, 55–71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9649-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9649-4