Abstract
Research into identification of gifted early childhood students of minority groups through classroom activities is lacking. A focus in the United States on students with learning challenges and a lack of awareness of educators concerning the needs of early childhood gifted students are important causes of this situation. The current case study investigated whether African American students not identified through standard achievement scores might be recognized as gifted through performance during and after a special enrichment project. Eight (four female, four male; five White, three African American) identified or potentially gifted first/second grade students from a multi-age, mixed ability, diverse classroom at an elementary school in Iowa, participated in a 12-week enrichment program to develop leadership through curriculum material making and peer teaching. School and university personnel collaborated to meet school needs: supplying challenging activities to high achievers, offering the opportunity for leadership through peer-teaching, and providing alternate means (leadership, creativity) of potentially identifying typically-achieving minority students as gifted. A pre-post class sociogram was administered to all students in the broader class (11 female 8 male). The teacher observed evidence that all participating students gained confidence and leadership skills; two of the three African American students were identified as gifted through their leadership, creativity, and academic performance during the project. Curriculum materials-making projects with integrated thinking skills like those in the current study were enriching for all participants in the current study, including classmates who were peer-taught; similar enrichment activities are recommended for primary grade students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banks, J. A. (2006). Diversity in American education: Foundations, curriculum and teaching. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Banks, J. A. (2008). Teaching strategies for ethnic studies. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Borland, J. H. (2004). Issues and practices in the identification and education of gifted students from under-represented groups. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
Boykin, A. W. (1994). Afro cultural expression and its implications for schooling. In E. R. Hollins, J. E. King, & W. C. Hayman (Eds.), Teaching diverse populations: Formulating a knowledge base (pp. 243–256). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cross, W. E., Jr, & Vandiver, B. J. (2001). Nigrescence theory and measurement: Introducing the cross racial identify scale (CRIS). In J. G. Ponterotto, J. M. Casas, L. A. Suzuki, & C. M. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (2nd ed., pp. 371–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
de Bono, E. (2000). Edward de Bono’s CoRT thinking lessons. Oxford, UK: Cavendish Information Products Ltd.
Education Connection (2012). Center for twenty first century skills at education connection. Retrieved from http://www.skills21.org/.
Ford, D. Y., & Kea, C. D. (2009). Creating culturally responsive instruction: For students’ sake and teachers’ sake. Focus on Exceptional Children, 41, 1–18.
Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T. C., & Whiting, G. W. (2008). Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues. Exceptional Children, 74, 289–308.
Ford, D. Y., Moore, J. L., & Scott, M. T. (2012). Key theories and frameworks for improving the recruitment and retention of African American students in gifted education. The Journal of Negro Education, 80(3), 239–253.
Fordham, S. (1988). Racelessness as a strategy in Black students’ school success: Pragmatic strategy or pyrrhic victory? Harvard Educational Review, 58, 54–84.
Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the burden of acting White. The Urban Review, 18, 176–203.
Garcia, E. E. (1991). The education of linguistically and culturally diverse students: Effective instructional practices. National Center on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. Educational Practice Report 1. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/2793n11s.
Gibby, B. (2012). Creativity and intelligence. In D. Lawton, P. Gordon, M. Ing, B. Gibby, R. Pring, & T. Moore (Eds.), Theory and practice of curriculum studies (chapter 11, unpaginated). New York: Routledge.
Grantham, T. C., & Ford, D. Y. (2003). Beyond self-concept and self-esteem: Racial identity and gifted African American students. The High School Journal, 87(1), 18–29.
Gross, M. U. M. (2003). Exceptionally gifted children (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge Falmer.
Louis, B., & Lewis, M. (1992). Parental beliefs about giftedness in young children and their relation to actual ability level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(1), 27–31.
Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented, volume 1: Report to the congress of the United States by the US commissioner of education. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Matthews, M. S. (2004). Leadership education for gifted and talented youth: A review of the literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(1), 77–113.
Merrell, K. W. (2008). Behavioral, social, and emotional assessment of children and adolescents (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Merrell, K. W., & Gimpel, G. A. (1998). Social skills of children and adolescents: Conceptualization, assessment, treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mickelson, R. A. (1990). The attitude-achievement paradox among black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63(1), 44–61.
Moehring, L., Landsberg, M., & Colbert, K. (2011). Creative curriculum: Gifted programming that begins in kindergarten. Iowa Talented and Gifted Association (ITAG) News Magazine, 36(3), 10–16.
National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC) (2008). Common gifted education myths. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/commonmyths.aspx.
Neihart, M., Reis, S. M., Robinson, N. M., & Moon, S. M. (Eds.). (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Nilholm, C., & Alm, B. (2010). An inclusive classroom? A case study of inclusiveness, teacher strategies, and children’s experiences. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25(3), 239–252.
Ogbu, J. U. (1992). Understanding cultural diversity and learning. Educational Researcher, 21, 5–13.
Ogbu, J. U., & Simons, H. D. (1998). Voluntary and involuntary minorities: A cultural-ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education. Anthropology and Education, Quarterly, 29, 155–188.
Partnership for twenty first Century Skills (2011). A framework for twenty first century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/home.
Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosewich, T. (2007). The gifted rating scales—school form: An analysis of the standardization sample based on age, gender, race, and diagnostic efficiency. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 39–50.
Pletan, M. D., Robinson, N. M., Berniger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (1995). Parents’ observations of kindergartners who are advanced in mathematical reasoning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 30–44.
Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Parent and peer ratings in the identification process. Neag Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Connecticut. Retrieved from http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/sem/peeridpr.html.
Renzulli, J. S. (1976). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20(3), 303–326.
Renzulli, J. S., Reis, S. M., & Smith, L. H. (1981). The revolving door identification model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Robinson, N. M. (2003). Two wrongs do not make a right: Sacrificing the needs of academically talented students does not solve society’s unsolved problems. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 251–273.
Robinson, N. M. (2008). Early childhood. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Steele, C. M. (1999). Thin ice: Stereotype threat and black college students. Atlantic Monthly, 284, 50–54.
Stephens, K. R., & Karnes, F. A. (2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited. Exceptional Children, 66, 219–238.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). Twenty first century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Valencia, R. R. (Ed.). (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. London: Fahner.
Zabelina, D. L. (2009). Unraveling the paradox: When creative and gifted students underachieve. Psychology Today Online. Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/finding-butterfly/200911/unraveling-the-paradox-when-creative-and-gifted-students-underachieve.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhbanova, K.S., Rule, A.C. & Stichter, M.K. Identification of Gifted African American Primary Grade Students through Leadership, Creativity, and Academic Performance in Curriculum Material Making and Peer-Teaching: A Case Study. Early Childhood Educ J 43, 143–156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0628-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0628-z