Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Model for Growing Teacher Talent Scouts: Decreasing Underrepresentation of Gifted Students

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Abstract

Underrepresentation of some talented students of promise has been an intractable issue in US public schools (Boothe & Stanley, 2004: Ford, 1995). Because giftedness as a concept is culturally bound, it is no surprise that the values of a culture contribute to the identification of who the gifted and talented are as well as the special educational services they receive. Access for high-ability students to programs and classes can positively impact an individual’s future education and professional opportunities. Teacher development as an approach for opening access and opportunity and growing diverse learners’ academic potential is addressed in this chapter. An overview of theories, models, and effective practices shown to develop teachers’ knowledge and skills to recognise and grow emergent talent of students from diverse backgrounds (Olszewski-Kubilius & Clarenbach, 2012; Subotnik, Olszewski-Kubilius, & Worrell, 2011) provides grounding in what is known. The overview connects talent development to key research in educational psychology, for example, motivation, persistence, and grit (Duckworth, 2016; Dweck, 2007). Exemplars of successful teacher-focused programs and projects (Coleman, Coltrane, Harradine, & Timmons, 2007: Gavin, Casa, Adelson, Carrolll, & Sheffield, 2009; VanTassel-Baska & Stambaugh, 2007) that raise rigor and challenge for all students via advanced curriculum and instruction translate theory into practice. The model of talent development that emerges consists of three primary components: cultural influences (Gay, 2000; Ladson-Billings, 2009), psychology of learning (e.g., Duckworth, 2016; Dweck, 2007), and powerful curriculum and instruction that utilises the Integrated Curriculum Model (VanTassel-Baska, 2013) with student-driven inquiry (Gavin, Casa, Adelson, Carrolll, & Sheffield, 2009). Research-based approaches (Swanson, Brock, & Kessler, 2018) used to advance professional learning of teachers, including whole group, small group, fidelity observations, and differentiated teacher learning, are shared. The chapter concludes with a discussion of a framework for growing student talent through focused teacher development and the implications for adoption of such a framework in the field, and potential directions for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boothe, D., & Stanley, J. C. (Eds.). (2004). In the eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity in gifted education. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A., VanTassel-Baska, J., Brown, E. F., & Feng, A. (2007). Project Athena: A tale of two studies. In J. VanTassel-Baska & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners (pp. 63–67). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buczynski, S., & Hansen, C. B. (2010). Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 26(3), 599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carraway, K. (2014). Transforming your teaching: Practical strategies informed by cognitive neuroscience. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, M. R., Coltrane, S. S., Harradine, C., & Timmons, L. A. (2007). Impact of poverty on promising learners, their teachers, and their schools. Journal of Urban Education: Focus on Enrichment, 6, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, M. R., Shah-Coltrane, S. S., & Harrison, A. (2010). Teacher’s observation of potential in students. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, F., Yssel, N., McConnell, J., & Hardin, T. (2014). Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214529042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. New York, NY: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L. (2013, April). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/angela_lee_duckworth_grit_the_power_of_passion_and_perseverance.

  • Dweck, C. (2007). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballentine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2010). Even geniuses work hard. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, J. O., & Worrell, F. C. (2012). Assessment practices and the underrepresentation of minority students in gifted and talented education. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. Y. (1995). Desegregating gifted education: A need unmet. Journal of Negro Education, 64, 52–62. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2967284

  • Ford, D. Y. (2013). Recruiting and retaining culturally different students in gifted education. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 60–74). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin, M. K., Casa, T. M., Adelson, J. L., Carroll, S. R., & Sheffield, L. J. (2009). The impact of advanced curriculum on the achievement of mathematically promising elementary students. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(3), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209334964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., Jeffries, N.O., Castellanos, F. X., Liu, H., Zijdenbos, A., …, & Rapoport, J. L. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 861–863. https://doi.org/10.1038/13158

  • Guenther, Z. C. (2011). Commentary on F. Gagné: Academic talent development and the equity issue in gifted education: Ethnic and socio-economic discrimination – Which prevails? Talent Development and Excellence, 3(1), 63–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, Z. L. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harslett, M. (1996). The concept of giftedness from an aboriginal cultural perspective. Gifted Education International, 11(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142949601100207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, C. (2014). The young scholars model. In C. M. Adams & K. M. Chandler (Eds.), Effective program models for gifted students from underserved populations. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob K. (1988). Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100–297, §1001, 102, Stat. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnes, F. A., & Shaunessy, E. (2004). The application of an individual professional development plan to gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 27(3), 60–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S. B., & Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Conceptions of giftedness. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 71–91). Boston, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H., VanTassel-Baska, J., Bracken, B. A., Feng, A., Stambaugh, T., & Bland, L. (2012). Project Clarion: Three years of science instruction in title I schools among K–third grade students. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9218-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African-American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, C. A., Adelson, J. L., Kearney, K. L., Cash, K., & O’Brien, R. L. (2018). Early opportunities to strengthen academic readiness: Effects of summer learning on mathematics achievement. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q. (2011). Commentary on F. Gagné: Academic talent development and the equity issue in gifted education equality of access in academic talent development programs: The more appropriate method and criteria. Talent Development and Excellence, 3(1), 83–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2005). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2010). Working with academically gifted students in urban settings: Issues and lessons learned. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Patterns and profiles of promising learners from poverty (pp. 85–106). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Clarenbach, J. (2014). Closing the opportunity gap: Program factors contributing to academic success in culturally different youth. Gifted Child Today, 37, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514520630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., Worrell, F. C., & Thomson, D. (2018). Talent development as a framework for delivery of services to gifted children. In J. L. Roberts, T. F. Inman, & J. H. Robins (Eds.), Introduction to gifted education (pp. 277–297). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C., Karen, M., Paro, L., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom assessment scoring system (CLASS) manual, K–3. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, B. M., D’Anci, K. E., & Rosenberg, I. H. (2010). Water, hydration, and health. Nutrition Reviews, 68(8), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00304.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand. (2017). Teachers matter: Understanding teachers’ impact on student achievement. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/education/projects/measuring-teacher-effectiveness/teachers-matter.html

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 217–245). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A., Adelson, J. L., Kidd, K. A., & Cunningham, C. M. (2017). A talent for tinkering: Developing talents in children from low-income households through engineering curriculum. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738049

  • Robinson, A., & Stambaugh, T. (2017, November). State of the states: What matters when identifying and serving gifted students from low income backgrounds? In A. Robinson & T. Stambaugh (Chairs), What works: Identifying and serving gifted learners from low income households. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the National Association of Gifted Children in Charlotte, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeh, A., Gruber, R., & Raviv, A. (2003). The effects of sleep restriction/extension on school-age children: What a difference an hour makes. Child Development, 74, 444–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.7402008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stambaugh, T. (2010a). Curriculum and instructional strategies for promising students of poverty [webinar]. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stambaugh, T. (2010b). The education of promising students in rural areas: What do we know and what can we do? In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Patterns and profiles of promising learners from poverty (pp. 59–84). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stambaugh, T., & Chandler, K. L. (2012). Effective curriculum for underserved gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J. D. (1995). Gifted African-American children in rural schools: Searching for the answers. Roeper Review, 17(4), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199509553678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J. D. (2006). Breaking through assumptions about low income, minority gifted students. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J. D. (2010). Teacher development to work effectively with diverse gifted learners. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Patterns and profiles of promising learners from poverty (pp. 219–243). Waco, TX: Prufrock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J. D. (2016). Drawing upon lessons learned: Effective curriculum and instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse gifted learners. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216642016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J. D., Brock, L., & Kessler, L. (2018). Talent development academies: Providing access and opportunity to advanced learning for Title I students. Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 45–59). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom (2nd ed.). Reston, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, Y. D. (2006). Adult learning theories: Impacting professional development programs. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 72(2), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanTassel-Baska, J. (2013). The integrated curriculum model. In C. Callahan & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education considering multiple perspectives (pp. 315–326). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanTassel-Baska, J., Avery, L., Struck, J., Feng, A. X., Bracken, B., Drummond, D., & Quek, C. (2005). Classroom observation scale-revised. Williamsburg, VA: Center for Gifted Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanTassel-Baska, J., Bracken, B., Feng, A., & Brown, E. (2009). A longitudinal study of reading comprehension and reasoning ability of students in elementary Title I schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33, 7–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (Eds.). (2007). Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb, J., Borko, H., & Liston, D. (2009). Growing talent: Promising professional development models and practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109337280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrell, F. C. (2010). Psychosocial stressors in the development of gifted learners with atypical profiles. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Patterns and profiles of promising learners from poverty (pp. 33–58). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, E. H. (2005). Factors that contribute to talented performance: A theoretical model from a Chinese perspective. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Zhang, D., Jiang, Y., Sun, W., Wang, Y., Chen, W., et al. (2015). Association between physical activity and teacher-reported academic performance among fifth-graders in Shanghai: A quantile regression. PLoS One, 10(3), e0115483. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115483

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this work comes from the US Jacob Javits Gifted and Talented Education Act, Grant Award Number S206A140029.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA

    Julie Dingle Swanson

  2. Javits Project, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA

    Lara Walker Russell & Lindsey Anderson

Authors
  1. Julie Dingle Swanson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lara Walker Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lindsey Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Dingle Swanson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. GERRIC, School of Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Susen R. Smith

Section Editor information

  1. St. John's University, New York, NY, USA

    Seokhee Cho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Swanson, J.D., Russell, L.W., Anderson, L. (2021). A Model for Growing Teacher Talent Scouts: Decreasing Underrepresentation of Gifted Students. In: Smith, S.R. (eds) Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3041-4_55

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation