Skip to main content
Log in

Tensions for Green Criminology

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines tensions that for the most part exist outside green criminology that could—and should—be brought under the green criminological gaze—issues that are not necessarily the province of green criminology but which have implications for the study of environmental crime and harm. Examples include: the conflicting messages that Western society encounters with respect to “victims” and “survivors”; claims of a lack of future orientation (Hayward 2012) in contrast to assertions of a risk-aversion in late modernity (Giddens 1999); frictions between the “precautionary principle” (Magnus 2008) and “precautionary logic” (Aas 2013); and the peculiarities of the “war on youth” (Grossberg 2001) in an era of “overparenting” (Kamenetz 2015) and “overindulged youth” (Kolbert 2012). The goal of the article is less to promulgate an agenda for green criminology than to heighten awareness of issues and contradictions that may contribute to environmental despoliation and degradation or frustrate efforts to address such harm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Pepinsky’s observation that “[w]hen we hold people responsible, we take over responsibility for the consequences of their actions,” evokes the work of the late Nils Christie (1977) on “conflicts as property.” Given the venue of the seminar where an embryonic version of this article was first presented—the Department of Criminology and Sociology of Law at the University of Oslo—where Christie had been a professor since 1966 until his untimely death in 2015, it seems appropriate to acknowledge the connection between Pepinsky and Christie’s work.

  2. For a similar discussion—of how “redress[ing] environmental harm for some victims may lead to forced changes in industrial practices, potentially putting other victims out of work”—see Hall (2014: 137).

  3. Of course, suggestions of an “environmental victimology” predate the work of Hall and Jarrell and Ozymy and others. For example, Williams’ (1996) article argues for the development of an “environmental victimology” as a discrete area of study—one distinct from an environmental justice approach—and works to define “victimization” in the context of environmental harms. While his piece describes limitations to the environmental justice movement, particularly its subjective definitions of victimization, its assumptions about power, and its taken-for-granted notions of group identity, it makes no explicit reference to “green criminology,” raising the question posed by Goyes and South in this issue of whether something is “green criminology” only if the author(s) say(s) so and use the term. Although this issue is outside the scope of the present article, Williams’ article seems to have become part of the green criminological canon as evidenced by its reproduction in two key readers: South and Beirne (2006) and White (2009).

  4. Green (2006:4) may be overstating matters with his claim that we are experiencing “the emergence of rule by victim groups—‘victimocracy’.” But there is something utterly perverse about legislation that makes police officers a protected class under some states’ hate crime laws (see, e.g., Associated Press 2017; Beitsch 2016; Desrochers 2017; Douglas and Mueller 2016; Izadi 2016; Phillips 2016; Sneed 2015; see generally Wang 2015). As I have argued elsewhere, “police power is not about the control of crime and the minimization of harm, as criminology has so frequently suggested, but is instead a power that exists for the production and reproduction of order and capitalism and the securing of insecurity” (McClanahan and Brisman 2017: 334). Given that the police (at least, in the modern nation-state) are often armed with lethal weaponry and invested with the power and capacity to invade privacy and use force—“the ‘rules of engagement’ between the cop and suspect is never reciprocal,” Wall (2016: 1133) reminds us—it stretches the limits of the imagination to think that they are a persecuted group with a history of social disenfranchisement such that they require additional protection under the law. Indeed, the notion of “police-as-victims” renders the definition of “victim” equivalent to its antonym: aggressor, oppressor. Or, in the words of Cantú (2015), expanding hate crime legislation to include violence against the police “paradoxically, give[s] legal protection to a group that is notorious for perpetrating violence against the very people that hate crime laws were originally intended to protect.”

  5. Other scholars and commentators have also commented on how the status of “victim” does not necessarily preclude one from also holding other positions of achieved status. For example, Wright (2016: 331) defines the “victim-hero” as someone “characterised by his/her suffering and by his/her actions of retribution in an effort to redeem the virtue of his/her loved one or of themselves (Anker 2005; Williams 1998)” (emphasis in original). Walklate (2017; see also 2016), to offer another example, distinguishes the categories of “primary,” “secondary,” “tertiary” and “indirect” victims/victimization and promulgates a continuum from the “victim-witness” to “witness-victim.”

  6. For an overview of the Rio Declaration on the Environment and Development (often shortened to the “Rio Declaration”), see Brisman (2011).

References

  • Aas, K. F. (2013). Globalization and Crime 2/e. London, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anker, E. (2005). Villains, victims and heroes: Melodrama, media and September 11. Journal of Communication, 55, 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Associated Press. (2017). House Oks bill to expand Kentucky’s hate crimes law. Lex18.com. Accessed at http://www.lex18.com/story/34494432/house-oks-bill-to-expand-kentuckys-hate-crimes-law.

  • Barber, B. (2007). Consumed: How markets corrupt children, infantilize adults and swallow citizens whole. London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. J. (2013). Courting kids: Inside an experimental youth court. NewYork: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Toward a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (1995). The use and abuse of animals in criminology: A brief history and current review. Social Justice, 22(1), 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (1997). Rethinking bestiality: Towards a concept of interspecies sexual assault. Theoretical Criminology, 1(3), 317–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (1999). For a nonspeciesist criminology: Animal abuse as an object of study. Criminology, 37(1), 117–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (2009). Confronting animal abuse: Law, criminology, and human-animal relationships. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (2014). Theriocide: Naming animal killing. International Journal For Crime, Justice And Social Democracy, 3(2), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beitsch, R. (2016). Is killing a police officer a hate crime? PBS NewsHour. Aug 3. Accessed at http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/killing-police-officer-hate-crime/.

  • Brisman, A. (2011). Rio declaration. In D. Chatterjee (Ed.), Encyclopedia of global justice (Vol. 2, pp. 960–961). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brisman, A. (2013). Not a bedtime story: Climate change, neoliberalism, and the future of the arctic. Michigan State International Law Review, 22(1), 241–289.

  • Brisman, A. (2016). Geometries of crime: How young people perceive crime and justice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brisman, A. (In Press). On narrative and green cultural criminology. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy.

  • Brisman, A., & South, N. (Eds.). (2013). Conclusion: The planned obsolescence of planet earth? How green criminology can help us learn from experience and contribute to our future. In Routledge international handbook of green criminology (pp. 409–417). London: Routledge.

  • Brisman, A., & South, N. (2015). ‘Life stage dissolution’, Infantilization and anti-social consumption: Implications for de-responsibilization, denial and environmental harm. Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 23(3), 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brisman, A., & South, N. (2017). Green cultural criminology, intergenerational (in)equity and “life stage dissolution”. In M. Hall, J. Maher, A. Nurse, G. Potter, N. South, & T. Wyatt (Eds.), Greening criminology in the 21st century (pp. 219–232). Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisman, A., & South, N. (In Press a). Green criminology. In A. Liebligh, S. Maruna, & L. McAra (Eds.), The oxford handbook of criminology, 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Brisman, A., South, N. (In Press b). Green criminology. In A. Brisman, E. Carrabine, & N. South (Eds.), The Routledge companion to criminological theory and concepts. London: Routledge.

  • Brooks, A. C. (2015). The real victims of victimhood. The New York Times. Dec 27, SR19.

  • Calcutt, A. (2000). Arrested development: Pop culture and the erosion of adulthood. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantú, A. M. (2015). How “hate crimes against police” expose the fatal flaw within hate crime statutes. Truthout. Jan 15. Accessed at http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/28543-how-hate-crimes-against-police-expose-the-fatal-flaw-within-hate-crime-statutes.

  • Carrington, K., & Hogg, R. (2012). History of critical criminology in Australia. In W. S. DeKeseredy & M. Dragiewicz (Eds.), Routledge handbook of critical criminology (pp. 46–60). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 1–15.

  • Croall, H. (2007). Food crime. In P. Beirne & N. South (Eds.), Issues in green criminology: Confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals (pp. 206–229). Cullompton, Devon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croall, H. (2013). Food crime: A green criminology perspective. In N. South & A. Brisman (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of green criminology (pp. 167–183). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danesi, M. (2003). Forever young: The ‘teen-aging’ of modern culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  • Davies, P. A. (2014). Green crime and victimization: Tensions between social and environmental justice. Theoretical Criminology, 18(3), 300–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, D. (2017). Bill to add first responders to hate-crime law passes House panel. Lexington Herald-Leader. Feb 9, 1A.

  • Douglas, W., & Mueller, E. (2016). ‘Blue lives matter’: Push to raise penalties for violence against cops. McClatchy DC. May 26. Accessed at http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/congress/article80058187.html.

  • Ferrell, J. (2013). Tangled up in green: Cultural criminology and Green criminology. In N. South & A. Brisman (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of green criminology (pp. 349–364). London: Routledge.

  • Feuer, A. (2013). ‘Preppers’ pack up for next disaster. Seattle Times Jan 26. Accessed at http://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/lsquopreppersrsquo-pack-up-for-next-disaster/.

  • Fitzgerald, A. J. (2010). The ‘underdog’ as ‘ideal victim’? The attribution of victimhood in the 2007 pet food recall. International Review of Victimology, 17(2), 131–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrig, R. J. (Ed.). (2007). The psychology of survivor: Leading pscyhologiss take an unauthorized look at the most elaborate experiment ever conducted. Survivor!. Dallas, TX: Benbella Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, C., Gore, M. L., Hamm, J. A., Rivers III, L., & Zwickle, A. (In Press). Conservation Criminology. In A. Brisman, E. Carrabine, & N. South (Eds.), The Routledge companion to criminological theory and concepts. London: Routledge.

  • Gibbs, C., Gore, M. L., McCarrell, E. F., & Rivers III, L. (2010). Introducing conservation criminology: Towards interdisciplinary scholarship on environmental crimes and risk. British Journal of Criminology, 50(1), 124–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, C., McGarrell, E. F., Axelrod, M., & Rivers III, L. (2011). Conservation criminology and the global trade in electronic waste: Applying a multidisciplinary research framework. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 35(4), 327–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1999). Risk and responsibility. The Modern Law Review, 62(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2004). The terror of neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the eclipse of democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyes, D. R., & South, N. (2016). Land-grabs, biopiracy and the inversion of justice in Colombia. British Journal of Criminology, 56(3), 558–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. G. (2006). We’re (nearly) all victims now! How political correctness is undermining our liberal culture. London: Institute for the Study of Civil Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grose, M. (2017). Spoonfed generation: How to raise independent children. Sydney: Random House Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, L. (2001). Why does neo-liberalism hate kids? The war on youth and the culture of politics. The Review of Education/Pedagogy/Cultural Studies, 23(2), 111–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2010). Victims and policy making: A comparative approach. Cullomtpon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2011). Environmental victims: Challenges for criminology and victimology in the 21st century. Varstvoslovje, Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, 13(4), 317–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2013). Victims of environmental harm: Rights, recognition and redress under national and international law. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2014). Environmental harm and environmental victims: Scoping out a ‘green victimology’. International Review of Victimology, 20(1), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2015). Exploring green crime: Introducing the legal, social and criminological contexts of environmental harm. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2016). Criminal redress in cases of environmental victimization: A defence. International Review of Victimology. doi:10.1177/0269758016672027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, M., & White, R. (1998). Crime, ecophilosophy and environmental harm. Theoretical Criminology, 2(3), 345–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, K. (2012). Pantomime justice: A cultural criminological analysis of ‘life stage dissolution’. Crime Media Culture, 8(2), 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, K., & Young, J. (2012). Cultural criminology. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology 5/e (pp. 113–137). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioffe, J. (2016). Apocalypse now: Survivalists dig in for November 9. Politico. Nov 8. Accessed at http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-2016-preppers-214433.

  • Itzkoff, D. (2017). Nearing the End of Logan’s Run. The New York Times Feb 19, AR10. Published online at “Hugh Jackman on Nearing the End of Logan’s Run” on Feb 15, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/movies/hugh-jackman-x-men-logan-wolverine.html?_r=0.

  • Izadi, E. (2016). Louisiana is the first state to offer hate crime protections to police officers. The Washington Post. May 26. Accessed at https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/05/26/louisianas-blue-lives-matter-bill-just-became-law/?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.de3db762a06b.

  • Jarrell, M. L., & Ozymy, J. (2012). Real crime, real victims: Environmental crime victims and the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA). Crime, Law and Social Change, 58(4), 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, C. (1996). Childhood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamenetz, A. (2015). How schools are handling an ‘overparenting’ crisis. National public radio. Aug 28. Accessed at http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2015/08/28/434350484/how-schools-are-handling-an-overparenting-crisis.

  • Kolbert, E. (2012). Spoiled Rotten. The New Yorker. July 2 (pp. 76–78). http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2012/07/02/120702crbo_books_kolbert.

  • Lacitis, E. (2012). ‘Preppers’ pack up for next disaster. Seattle Times. May 14. Accessed at http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/preppers-do-their-best-to-be-ready-for-the-worst/.

  • Lamb, S. (1999). New versions of victims: Feminists’ struggle with the concept. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, G. (2012). Capitalism: A structural genocide. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, D. (2008). Risk management versus the precautionary principle: Agnotology as a strategy in the debate over genetically engineered organisms. In R. N. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 250–265). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. (2014). Realist criminology. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McClanahan, B., & Brisman, A. (2017). Police violence and the failed promise of human rights. In L. Weber, E. Fishwick, & M. Marmo (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of criminology and human rights (pp. 333–341). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarrell, E. F., & Gibbs, C. (2014). Conservation criminology, environmental crime and risk: An application to climate change. Oxford Handbooks Online. 2014-11-03. Oxford University Press. Accessed Nov 7 2014. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935383.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199935383-e-54.

  • Mollard, A. (2017). Over-parenting is ruining our kids. The Daily Telegraph. Jan 7. Accessed at http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/rendezview/overparenting-is-ruining-our-kids/news-story/852eead768624f0c5fa648cf195ecf49.

  • Mooallem, J. (2009). “The end is near!” The New York Times Magazine , 19 April (pp. 28–32, 34).

  • Pease, K. (2007). Victims and victimisation. In S. Shoham, O. Beck, & M. Kent (Eds.), International handbook of penology and criminal justice. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepinsky, H. (2012). Peacemaking criminology. In W. S. DeKeseredy & M. Dragiewicz (Eds.), Routledge handbook of critical criminology (pp. 186–193). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (2016). The state where targeting a police officer is a hate crime. The Washington Post. July 8. Accessed at https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/08/the-state-where-targeting-a-police-officer-is-a-hate-crime/?utm_term=.5d7e15fbc274.

  • Piper, C. (2008). Investing in Children: Policy, law and practice in context. Cullompton, Devon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, L., & Gibbs, C. (2011). Applying a conservation criminology framework to common pool natural resource issues. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 35(4), 269–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, T. (2015). Hate crime experts skeptical of call for cops to be covered by Federal law. US News & World Report. Jan 8. Accessed at http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/01/08/hate-crime-experts-skeptical-of-call-for-cops-to-be-covered-by-federal-law.

  • Sollund, R. (2011). Expressions of speciesism: the effects of keeping companion animals on animal abuse, animal trafficking and species decline. Crime, Law and Social Change, 55(5), 437–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sollund, R. (2012). Speciesism as doxic practice versus valuing difference and plurality. In R. Ellefsen, R. Sollund, & G. Larsen (Eds.), Eco-global crimes, contemporary problems and future challenges (pp. 91–113). Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollund, R. (2013). The victimization of women, children and non-human species through trafficking and trade: Crimes understood through an ecofeminist perspective. In N. South & A. Brisman (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of green criminology (pp. 317–330). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollund, R. A. (2015a). The illegal wildlife trade from a norwegian outlook: Tendencies in practice and law enforcement. In R. A. Sollund (Ed.), Green harms and crimes: Critical criminology in a changing world (pp. 147–169). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sollund, R. A. (2015b). Introduction: Critical green criminology—An agenda for change. In R. A. Sollund (Ed.), Green harms and crimes: Critical criminology in a changing world (pp. 1–26). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sollund, R. (2017). The animal other: Legal and illegal theriocide. In M. Hall, J. Maher, A. Nurse, G. Potter, N. South & T Wyatt (Eds.), Greening criminology in the 21st century: Contemporary debates and future directions in the study of environmental harm (pp. 79–99). London: Routledge.

  • Sollund, R. (In press). The use and abuse of animals in wildlife trafficking in Colombia: Practices and injustice. In D. R. Goyes, H. Mol, A. Brisman, & N. South (Eds.), Environmental crime in Latin America: The theft of nature and the poisoning of the land, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • South, N., & Beirne, P. (Eds.). (2006). Green criminology. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teven, J. J. (2004). Survivor the Amazon: An examination of the persuasive strategies used to outwit, outplay, and outlast the competition. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 29(1), 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S. (2016). The metamorphosis of the victim of crime: From crime to culture and the implications for justice. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(4), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S. (2017). “Victimhood and witnessing.” Oxford research encyclopedia of crime, media, and popular culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Wall, T. (2016). Ordinary emergency: Drones, police, and geographies of legal terror. Antipode, 48(4), 1122–1139.

  • Walters, R. (2004). Criminology and genetically modified food. British Journal of Criminology, 44(2), 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R. (2006). Crime, bio-agriculture and the exploitation of hunger. British Journal of Criminology, 46(1), 26–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R. (2011). Eco crime and genetically modified food. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2015). Should attacking police officers become a hate crime? A Minnesota city says yes. The Washington Post. Oct 8. Accessed at https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/10/08/should-attacking-police-officers-become-a-hate-crime-a-minnesota-city-says-yes/?utm_term=.8a0d8659f315.

  • White, R. (Ed.). (2009). Environmental crime: A reader. Cullompton, Devon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2011a). Climate change, uncertain futures and the sociology of youth. Youth Studies Australia, 30(3), 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2011b). Transnational environmental crime: Toward an eco-global criminology. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2013). Environmental harm: An eco-justice perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, R., & Heckenberg, D. (2014). Green criminology: An introduction to the study of environmental harm. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (1996). An environmental victimology. Social Justice, 23(4), 16–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. (1998). Melodrama revisited. In N. Browne (Ed.), Refiguring American film genres (pp. 42–88). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C., Robinson, T., & Callister, M. (2012). Surviving Survivor: A content analysis of antisocial behavior and its context in a popular reality television show. Mass Communication and Society, 15(2), 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2016). “Ah … the power of mothers”: Bereaved mothers as victim-heroes in media enacted crusades for justice. Crime Media Culture, 12(3), 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitek, E. M., Jordan, A. H., Monin, B., & Leach, F. R. (2010). Victim entitlement to behave selfishly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avi Brisman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brisman, A. Tensions for Green Criminology. Crit Crim 25, 311–323 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-017-9365-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-017-9365-8

Keywords

Navigation