Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Deceit, Misuse and Favours: Understanding and Measuring Attitudes to Ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Society is increasing its demands for more ethical behaviour by managers of organizations. However, societal and workplace ethical attitudes are constantly evolving as generational differences and demographic diversity make the workplace more complex. While a number of studies have attempted to classify ethical attitudes into different categories, more work in this area is needed. This paper reports on a study that examined attitudes towards the acceptability of workplace behaviour that might be considered unethical. Graduate business students at an Australian university (n = 234) were asked to indicate the ethicality of 17 different behaviours, drawn from the business ethics literature. Exploratory factor analysis identified distinct factors, consisting of misuse of company resources, self-serving deceit, and the giving or receiving favours for personal gain. The derived factor structure was then tested with confirmatory factor analysis. Descriptive statistics indicated that misuse was considered less unethical than exchanging favours for personal gain. Deceit was considered the most unethical type of behaviour. Implications for managers and directions for further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Ackert, L. F., Church, B. K., Kuang, X., & Qi, L. (2011). Lying: An experimental investigation of the role of situational factors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4), 605–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaah, I. P., & Lund, D. (1994). The influence of personal and organisational values on marketing professionals’ ethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(6), 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alahmad, A. (2010). To be ethical or not to be: An international code of ethics for leadership. Journal of Diversity Management, 5(1), 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Kazemi, A. A., & Zajac, G. (1999). Ethics sensitivity and awareness within organisations in Kuwait: An empirical exploration of espoused theory and theory-in-use. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Khatib, J. A., Robertson, C. J., D’Auria Stanton, A., & Vitell, S. J. (2002). Business ethics in the Arab Gulf states: A three-country study. International Business Review, 11, 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, M. L., Arnaud, A., & Schminke, M. (2008). Individual moral development and ethical climate: The influence of person–organization fit on job attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angus-Leppan, T., Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2010). Leadership styles and csr practice: an examination of sensemaking, Institutional drivers and CSR leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4 user’s guide. Chicago, Il: SmallWaters Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkanasy, N. M., Falkus, S., & Callan, V. (2000). Predictors of ethical code use and ethical tolerance in the public sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3), 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2012). Reflecting a Nation: Stories from the 2011 Census, 2012–2013. Catalogue 2071.0. Accessed August 30, 2012 from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/2071.0main+features902012-2013.

  • Becker, H., & Fritzsche, D. J. (1987). Business ethics: A cross-cultural comparison of managers attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(4), 289–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berings, D., & Adriaenssens, S. (2012). Role of business ethics, personality, work values and gender in vocational interests from adolescents, Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 325–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Bucar, B., & Drnovsek, M. (2004). Ethical behavior construct: Measurent and practical implications. Retrieved January 30, 2006, from http://miha.ef.uni-lj.si/-dokumenti/wp/Ethical%20behaviour%construct5_Bucar_new.doc.

  • Cacioppe, R., Forster, N., & Fox, M. (2008). A survey of managers’ perceptions of corporate ethics and social responsibility and actions that may affect companies’ success. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardy, R. L., & Selvarajan, T. T. (2004). Assessing ethical behavior: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale. In 47th Midwest Academy of Management Meeting.

  • Carlson, D. S., & Kaemar, M. K. (1997). Perceptions of ethics across situations: A view through three different lenses. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. M. (1997). Ethical differences between men and women in the sales profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(11), 1143–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, S. P. (1997). Managers’ perception of proper ethical conduct: The effect of sex, age, and level of education. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1), 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, T. L. N., Conroy, S. J., & Stanley, C. W. (2007). Ethical attitudes of accountants: Recent evidence from a practitioners’ survey. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(1), 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdener, C. B. (1996). Ethnicity, nationality and gender: A cross-cultural comparison of business ethical decisions in four countries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(4), 866–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etheredge, J. M. (1999). The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., & Weaver, K. M. (1978). Ethical beliefs of marketing managers. Journal of Marketing, 42(3), 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J., & Effy, O. (2007). Personal values’ influence on the ethical dimension of decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 335–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glas, M. (1999). Ethics and entrepreneurs: An international comparative study. In International conference on entrepreneurship education and training, Sofia, Bulgaria.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, P. (2007). Husserl’s critique of Kant’s ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45(2), 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holian, R. (2006). Management decision making, ethical issues and “emotional” intelligence. Management Decision, 44(8), 1122–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, L. D. (2002). The importance of ethics. The Internal Auditor, 59(1), 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, A. (1997). Are women more ethical than men? Baylor Business Review, 15(1), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, M. E., & Dann, P. L. (1987). Exploratory factor analysis of the just world scale using British undergraduates. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issa, T., & Pick, D. (2010). Ethical mindsets: An Australian study. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 613–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izraeli, D. (1988). Ethical beliefs and behavior among managers: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(4), 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T., & Artola, M. C. (1997). Ethical beliefs and management behavior: a cross cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(11), 1163–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2003). As if business ethics were possible, within such limits. Organisation, 10(2), 223–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, J., & Weisberg, J. (2002). Ethical attitudes and ethical behavior: Are managers role models? International Journal of Manpower, 23(8), 687–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, D., & Lipton, P. (2005). Corporate governance and business ethics in the Asia-Pacific region. Business and Society, 44(2), 178–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, D., & Lipton, P. (2006). Business ethics and corporate governance in the Asia-Pacific region. In G. J. D. Rossouw, G. Alejo José & A. J. G. Sison, (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Ethics of Corporate Governance. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Lau, V., & Wong, Y. (2009). Direct and multiplicative effects of ethical dispositions and ethical climates on personal justice norms: A virtual ethics perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmergaard, J., & Lauridsen, J. (2008). The ethical climate of Danish firms: A discussion and enhancement of the ethical-climate model. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 653–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Y. P., Rechner, P. L., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2005). Shaping ethical perceptions: An empirical assessment of the influence of business education, culture, and demographic factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(4), 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loviscky, G. E., Trevino, L. K., & Jacobs, R. R. (2007). Assessing managers’ ethical decision-making: An objective measure of managerial moral judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(3), 263–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., & Pless, N. (2009). Business leaders as citizens of the world. Advancing Humanism on a global scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 537–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1999). Social structures and their threat to moral agency. Philosophy, 74, 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. In G. A. Marcoulides, & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling, (pp. 315–352). Mahwa, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Marshall, B., & Dewe, P. (1997). An investigation of the components of moral intensity. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(15), 521–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, A. C., Ingram, R., & Conway Dato-on, M. (2006). The business of ethics and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newstrom, J. W., & Ruch W. A. (1975). The ethics of management and the management of ethics. MSU Business Topics, Winter, pp. 29–37.

  • Oxford Dictionary. (2011). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary (online). Retrieved March 28, 2011, from http://www.oxfordadvancedlearnersdictionary.com/dictionary.

  • Perryer, C., & Jordan, C. (2002). The influence of gender, age, culture and other factors on ethical beliefs: A comparative study in Australia and Singapore. Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal, 7(4), 367–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perryer, C., & Plowman, D. (2010). Demographic variables as predictors of ethical attitudes at work: An empirical study in the Philippines. In Academy of International Business Southeast Asia Regional Conference.

  • Perryer, C., & Tsahuridu, E. (2004). The effect of gender, age, home and work influences on ethical beliefs. In 3rd global conference on business and economics, Amsterdam.

  • Peterson, D., Rhoads, A., & Vaught, B. C. (2001). Ethical beliefs of business professionals: A study of gender, age and external factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(3), 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phau, I., & Kea, G. (2007). Attitudes of university students toward business ethics: A cross-national investigation of Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(1), 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preble, J. F., & Reichel, A. (1988). Attitudes towards business ethics of future managers in the U.S. and Israel. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(12), 941–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premeaux, S. (2009). The link between management behavior and ethical philosophy in the wake of the Enron convictions. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M., & Gibson, A. M. (1990). Methodology in business ethics research: A review and critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(6), 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. C., & Mitra, K. (1998). The effects of individual difference factors on the acceptability of ethical and unethical workplace behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(14), 1581–1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. C. (2009). ‘Corporate social responsibility and different stages of economic development: Singapore, Turkey, and Ethiopia. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 617–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, G., & Lockridge, T. M. (2010). Ethics and culture: Is there a relationship? The International Business and Economics Research Journal, 9(1), 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, G., & Wenzel, L. (2007). Individual traits and acceptance of unethical actions. Ethics and Critical Thinking Journal., 4, 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. D. (2000). Moral values: Situationally defined individual differences. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(2), 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serwinek, P. J. (1992). Demographic and related differences in ethical views among small businesses. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(7), 555–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simga-Mugan, C., Daly, B. A., Onkal, D., & Kavut, L. (2005). The influence of nationality and gender on ethical sensitivity: An application of the issue-contingent model. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R. (1992). The challenge of ethical behavior in organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(7), 505–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Kraft, K. L., Vitell, S. J., & Rallapalli, K. C. (1995). The perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility on organisational effectiveness: A survey of marketers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1), 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., Rallapalli, K. C., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: A scale development. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(4), 1131–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soutar, G. N., McNeil, M. M., & Molster, C. (1994). The impact of the work environment on ethical decision making: Some Australian evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(5), 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R. E., Harris, O. J., & Williamson, S. (1993). A comparison of ethical evaluations of business school faculty and students: A pilot study. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(8), 611–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, M., & Street, V. L. (2006). The effects of escalating commitment on ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(4), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toor, S., & Ofori, G. (2009). Ethical leadership: Examining the relationships with full range leadership model, employee outcomes, and organisational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 533–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency.org. (2011). Retrieved February 28, 2011 from http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/gcb/2010/results.

  • Trevino, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4), 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, C. L., & Tyler, J. M. (2006). Applying the transtheoretical model of change to the sequencing of ethics instruction in business education. Journal of Management Education, 30(1), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega, G. (2007). Teaching business ethics through service learning meta-projects. Journal of Management Education, 32(5), 647–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organisational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimbush, J. C., Shepard, J., & Markham, S. E. (1997). An empirical examination of the relationship between ethical climate and ethical behavior from multiple levels of analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(16), 1705–1716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. The Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & LaTour, M. S. (1987). Corporate social responsibility and organisational effectiveness: A multivariate approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(6), 459–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, University of Western Australia, M404, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Chris Perryer

  2. Curtin Business School, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia

    Brenda Scott-Ladd

Authors
  1. Chris Perryer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brenda Scott-Ladd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brenda Scott-Ladd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perryer, C., Scott-Ladd, B. Deceit, Misuse and Favours: Understanding and Measuring Attitudes to Ethics. J Bus Ethics 121, 123–134 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1593-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1593-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation