Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Business Leaders as Citizens of the World. Advancing Humanism on a Global Scale

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the world is getting increasingly connected and interdependent it becomes clear that the world’s most pressing public problems such as poverty or global warming call for cross-sector solutions. The paper discusses the idea of business leaders acting as agents of world benefit, taking an active co-responsibility in generating solutions to problems. It argues that we need responsible global leaders who are aware of the pressing problems in the world, care for the needs of others, aspire to make this world a better place, and act in word and deed as global and responsible citizens. The argument is structured as follows: first, in highlighting some leadership challenges we discuss why it takes a responsible, global, and ultimately cosmopolitan mindset to enhance human values on a global scale. Second, we define more specifically responsible global leadership and the (potential) role of business leaders acting as agents of world benefit. Third, drawing on latest research on cosmopolitanism, we discuss the hallmarks of contemporary cosmopolitanism. Fourth, and concluding our argument, we propose key cosmopolitan business principles to help leaders build a more inclusive world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, N.J.: 2006, ‹The Arts & Leadership: Now That We Can Do Anything, What Will We Do?’, Academy of Management Learning & Education 5(4), 486-499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appiah, K.A.: 2006, Cosmopolitanism. Ethics in a World of Strangers (W.W. Norton & Company, New York and London).

    Google Scholar 

  • BAWB (Business as an Agent of World Benefit’): 2006, First conference on ‹Business as an Agent of World Benefit’, held by Case Western Reserve University (Academy of Management & UN Global Compact, Cleveland OH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U.: 2008, ‹Reframing Power in the Globalized World’, Organization Studies 29(5), 793-804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, D.: 1998, ‹Human Rights as a Model for Cosmopolitan Democracy’, in D. Archibugi, D. Held and M. Köhler (eds.), Re-imagining Political Community. Polity Press: Cambridge, 58-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S.: 2006, Another Cosmopolitanism (Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. and B. Nanus: 1985, Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge (Harper & Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J. and M. Lutz-Bachmann (eds.): 1997, Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal (MIT Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, G. and H. Brighouse (eds.): 2005, The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J.M.: 1978, Leadership (Perennial, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, D.K. (ed.): 2004, The Ethics of Assistance: Morality and the Distant Needy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheah, P.: 2006, Inhuman Conditions: On Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA/London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J. (ed.): 1998, Ethics, The Heart of Leadership (Praeger, Westport, CT, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J.: 2006, ‹Ethics. The Heart of Leadership’. in Th. Maak and N.M. Pless (eds.), Responsible leadership. Routledge, London/New York, 17-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, B.C. and J.M. Bryson: 2005, Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Public Problems in a Shared-Power World, 2nd ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, F.: 2003, ‹Cosmopolitanism. Moral and Political’, Political Theory 31(3), 421-442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G.: 2006, ‹The Cosmopolitan Imagination: Critical Cosmopolitanism and Social Theory’, The British Journal of Sociology 57(1), 25-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and L.E. Preston: 1995, ‹The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, J.: 2007, ‹Cosmopolitan Virtue’, Social Theory and Practice 33(4), 595-608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J.: 1998, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21 st Century Business (New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC/Stony Creek, CT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H.G.: 1988, The Importance of What We Care About (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman Publishers, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E.: 1994, ‹The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 409-422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., Martin, K., Parmar, B., Cording, M. and P.H. Werhane: 2006, ‹Leading Through Values and Ethical Principles’, in R.J. Burke and C.L. Cooper (eds.), Inspiring Leaders. Routledge, London/New York, 149-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T.L.: 2005, The World is Flat (Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K.: 1977/2002, Servant Leadership. A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power & Greatness, 25th Anniversary Edition (Paulist Press, New York/ Mahwah, NJ)

  • Held, D.: 1995, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Polity Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D.: 2005, ‹Principles of Cosmopolitan Order’, in G. Brock and H. Brighouse (eds.), The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.10-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia: 2005, Ethics of Care (Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hooijberg, R., Hunt, J.G. and G.E. Dodge: 1997, ‹Leadership Complexity and Development of the Leaderplex Model’, Journal of Management 23, 375-408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.M., Felps, W. and G. Bigley: 2007, ‹Ethical Theory and Stakeholder-Related Decisions: The Role of Stakeholder Culture’, Academy of Management Review 32(1), 137-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1795, ‹Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch’, in H. Reiss (ed.), Kant: Political Writings (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994), pp. 93–131

  • Küng, H.: 1991, Global Responsibility: In Search for a New World Ethic (Crossroad, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, H. and K.-J. Kuschel: 1995, A Global Ethic: The Declaration of the Parliament of the World’s Religions (Continuum, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuper, A. (ed.): 2005, Global Responsibilities. Who Must Deliver on Human Rights? (Routledge, New York/London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (ed.): 1995, The Rights of Minority Cultures (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, O., Beechler, S., Taylor, S. and N.A. Boyacigiller: 2007, ‹What We Talk About When We Talk About ‹Global Mindset’: Managerial Cognition in Multinational Corporations’, Journal of International Business Studies 38, 231-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, G. and C. Wilson: 2006, A Corporate Solution to Poverty (Princeton University Press, Princeton/Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R.G. and D.J. Brown: 2001, ‹Leadership, Values, and Subordinate Self-Concepts’, The Leadership Quarterly 12, 133-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, Th.: 2007, ‹Responsible Leadership, Stakeholder Engagement and the Emergence of Social Capital’, Journal of Business Ethics 74(4), 329-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, Th. and N.M. Pless: 2006a, ‹Responsible Leadership: A Relational Approach’, in Th. Maak and N.M. Pless (eds.), Responsible leadership, (Routledge, London/ New York), pp. 33-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maak, Th. and N.M. Pless: 2006b, ‹Responsible Leadership in a Stakeholder Society’, Journal of Business Ethics 66, 99-115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, Th. and N.M. Pless: 2008, ‹Responsible Leadership in a Globalized World: A Cosmopolitan Perspective’, in A.G. Scherer, and G. Palazzo (eds.), Handbook of Global Corporate Citizenship Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 430-453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, M.: 2007, The Leaders We Need And What Makes Us Follow (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • May, L.: 1993, Sharing Responsibility (Chicago University Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.: 2005, ‹Distributing Responsibilities’, in A. Kuper (ed.), Global Responsibilities. Who Must Deliver on Human Rights? Routledge, New York/London, pp. 95-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.K, B.R. Agle and D.J. Wood: 1997, ‹Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853-886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Th.: 1991, Equality and Partiality (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N.: 2003, Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, 2nd Rev. Edition (University of California Press, Berkeley)

  • Nussbaum, M.C.: 1996, ‹Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism’, in J. Cohen (ed.), For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Cosmopolitanism (Beacon Press, Boston, MA), pp. 3-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C.: 2004, ‹Women and Theories of Global Justice: Our Need for New Paradigms’, in D.K. Chatterjee (ed.), The Ethics of Assistance: Morality and the Distant Needy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 147-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C.: 2005, ‹Beyond the Social Contract: Capabilities and Global Justice’, in G. Brock and H. Brighouse (eds.), The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 196-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C. and A. Sen (eds.): 1993, The Quality of Life (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O.: 2004, ‹Global Justice: Whose Obligations’, in D.K. Chatterjee (ed.), The Ethics of Assistance: Morality and the Distant Needy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 242-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O.: 2005, ‹Agents of Justice’, in A. Kuper (ed.), Global Responsibilities. Who Must Deliver on Human Rights?. Routledge, New York/London, pp. 37-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pless, N.M.: 2007, ‹Understanding Responsible Leadership: Roles Identity and Motivational Drivers. The Case of Dame Anita Roddick’, Journal of Business Ethics 74(4), 437-456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pless, N. M. and Th. Maak: 2005, ‹Relational Intelligence for Leading Responsibly in a Connected World’, in K. M. Weaver (ed.), Proceedings of the 65 th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (AOM, Honolulu, HI)

  • Pogge, Th.: 2002, World Poverty and Human Rights (Polity Press, Cambridge/Malden, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, Th.: 2005, ‹A Cosmopolitan Perspective on the Global Economic Order’, in G. Brock and H. Brighouse (eds.), The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 92-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, Th. (ed.): 2007, Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right? (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2006, ‹Strategy & Society. The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review December, 78–92

  • Post, J.E., Preston, L.E. and S. Sachs: 2002, Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management And Organizational Wealth (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K.: 2005, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, T.L.: 2005, Understanding Ethical Failures in Leadership (Cambridge University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1999, The Law of Peoples (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA/London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J.C.: 1991, Leadership for the 21 st Century (Quorum, Westport, CT/London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J.: 2008, Common Wealth. Economics for a Crowded Planet (Allen Lane, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T.M.: 1998, What We Owe to Each Other (The Belknap Press at Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA/London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M.: 2002, ‹The Stakeholder Model of Organizational Leadership’, Organization Science 13(2), 209-220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.: 1999, Development as Freedom (Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.: 1759, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Glasgow Edition (Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN)

  • Vertovec, S. and R. Cohen (eds.): 2002, Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context, and Practice (Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M.: 1994, Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. and M. Sillanpäa: 1997, The Stakeholder Corporation (Pitman Publishing, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I.M.: 2004, ‹Responsibility and Global Justice’, Journal of Political Philosophy 12(4), 365-388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M.: 2007, Creating a World without Poverty (Public Affairs, New York).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Maak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maak, T., Pless, N.M. Business Leaders as Citizens of the World. Advancing Humanism on a Global Scale. J Bus Ethics 88, 537–550 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0122-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0122-0

Key words

Navigation