Skip to main content
Log in

Weeds within willow short-rotation coppices alter the arthropod community and improve biological control of the blue willow beetle

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Outbreaks of the blue willow beetle Phratora vulgatissima (L.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) threaten the yield of willow plantations that rely on biological control by natural enemies. Here we show that weed presence increases herbivore and predator/parasitoid diversity on willow shoots and causes increased predation on P. vulgatissima eggs compared to shoots within plots without weeds. We argue that, in addition to higher abundance, the community shift in favour of egg consumers and additive predator effects causes the higher predation pressure. This increase (~35 %) was apparent despite more alternative prey. Neither the willow genotype on which the predator–prey interaction occurred nor the clutch size affected egg predation levels. Our results support root’s enemy hypothesis and suggest that intensive weed control might counteract biological control in willow plantations. However, at least during the establishing phase of the plantation, increased biocontrol probably does not compensate for yield losses caused by competing weeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åhman I (2001) Management of pests and diseases in biomass willow. Sver Utsädesfören Tidskr 111:98–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertsson J, Hansson D, Bertholdsson NO, Åhman I (2014a) Site-related set-back by weeds on the establishment of 12 biomass willow clones. Weed Res 54:398–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albertsson J, Verwijst T, Hansson D, Bertholdsson NO, Åhman I (2014b) Effects of competition between short-rotation willow and weeds on performance of different clones and associated weed flora during the first harvest cycle. Biomass Bioenergy 70:364–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andow D (1991) Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annu Rev Entomol 36:561–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baffoe K, Dalin P, Nordlander G, Stenberg JA (2012) Importance of temperature for the performance and biocontrol efficiency of the parasitoid Perilitus brevicollis (Hymenoptera: braconidae) on Salix. BioControl 57:611–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates DM, Maechler M, Bolker BM, Walker S (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Version 1.1–7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4

  • Bennett AB, Gratton C (2013) Floral diversity increases beneficial arthropod richness and decreases variability in arthropod community composition. Ecol Appl 23:86–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman C, Bommarco R (2004) Harvesting disrupts biological control of herbivores in a short-rotation coppice system. Ecol Appl 14:1624–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman C, Liman A-S (2005) Foraging behaviour influences the outcome of predator-predator interactions. Ecol Entomol 30:164–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman C, Höglund S, Eklund K, Larsson S (2000) Effects of leaf beetle damage on stem wood production in coppicing willow. Agric For Entomol 2:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman C, Dalin P, Eklund K (2003) Generalist natural enemies of a willow leaf beetle (Phratora vulgatissima): abundance and feeding habits. J Insect Behav 16:747–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman C, Johansson H, Snäll T (2011) Spatial distribution of interacting insect predators: possible roles of intraguild predation and the surrounding habitat. Basic Appl Ecol 12:516–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burda M (2013) paircompviz: multiple comparison test visualization. R package version 1.3.0

  • Caslin B, Finnan J, McCracken A (2010) Short rotation coppice willow best practice guidelines. Agri-Food and Bioscience Institute, Belfast

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay DV, Dixon FL (1995) Vegetation management in the establishment of poplar and willow short-rotation coppice. Brighton crop protection conference: weeds. Proceedings of an international conference, Brighton, pp 979–984

  • Dalin P, Kindvall O, Björkman C (2006) Predator foraging strategy influences prey population dynamics: arthropods predating a gregarious leaf beetle. Anim Behav 72:1025–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalin P, Kindvall O, Björkman C (2009) Reduced population control of an insect pest in managed willow monocultures. PLoS ONE 4:e5487

  • Dempster J (1960) A quantitative study of the predators on the eggs and larvae of the broom beetle, Phytodecta olivacea forster, using the precipitin test. J Anim Ecol 29:149–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (2000) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An {R} companion to applied regression. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ, Partridge L, Harvey PH (1991) Clutch Size. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:409–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr G, Wratten S, Luna J (2003) Multi-function agricultural biodiversity: pest management and other benefits. Basic Appl Ecol 116:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haenke S, Scheid B, Schaefer M, Tscharntke T, Thies C (2009) Increasing syrphid fly diversity and density in sown flower strips within simple vs. complex landscapes. J Appl Ecol 46:1106–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks C, Johnson M (2006) Population densities of herbivorous lepidopterans in diverse cruciferous cropping habitats: effects of mixed cropping and using a living mulch. BioControl 51:485–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical J 50:346–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp A, Shield I (2008) Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. New Phytol 179:15–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall D, Wiltshire C, Butcher M (1996) Phenology and population dynamics of willow beetles (Coleoptera; Chrysomelidae) in short-rotation coppiced willows at Long Ashton. ETSU (DTI) Biofuels Study B/M4/00487/14/REP. IACR-Long Ashton Research Station, Bristol

  • Keoleian GA, Volk TA (2005) Renewable energy from willow biomass crops: life cycle energy, environmental and economic performance. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:385–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu Rev Entomol 45:175–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrman A, Torp M, Stenberg JA, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Björkman C (2012) Estimating direct resistance in willows against a major insect pest, Phratora vulgatissima, by comparing life history traits. Entomol Exp Appl 144:93–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren JG, Wyckhuys KAG, Desneux N (2008) Population responses by Orius insidiosus to vegetational diversity. BioControl 54:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson U, Rännbäck LM, Anderson P, Rämert B (2012) Herbivore response to habitat manipulation with floral resources: a study of the cabbage root fly. J Appl Entomol 136:481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neal ME, Zontek EL, Szendrei Z, Landis DA, Isaacs R (2005) Ground predator abundance affects prey removal in highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) fields and can be altered by aisle ground covers. BioControl 50:205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens M, Henry H, Wagner H (2012) vegan: community ecology package. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/

  • Pimentel D (1961) Species diversity and insect population outbreaks. Ann Entomol Soc Am 5:76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root R (1973) Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol Monogr 43:95–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root R, Cappuccino N (1992) Patterns in population change and the organization of the insect community associated with goldenrod. Ecol Monogr 62:393–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg J (2012) Plant-mediated effects of different Salix species on the performance of the braconid parasitoid Perilitus brevicollis. Biol Control 60:54–58

  • Stenberg JA, Lehrman A, Björkman C (2010) Uncoupling direct and indirect plant defences: novel opportunities for improving crop security in willow plantations. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:528–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg JA, Lehrman A, Björkman C (2011a) Host-plant genotype mediates supply and demand of animal food in an omnivorous insect. Ecol Entomol 36:442–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg JA, Lehrman A, Björkman C (2011b) Plant defence: feeding your bodyguards can be counter-productive. Basic Appl Ecol 12:629–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan JG, Stenberg JA, Björkman C (2015) How far away is the next basket of eggs? Spatial memory and perceived cues shape aggregation patterns in a leaf beetle. Ecology 96:908–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Straub CS, Finke DL, Snyder WE (2008) Are the conservation of natural enemy biodiversity and biological control compatible goals? Biol Control 45:225–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL http://www.R-project.org

  • Urbanek S, Horner J (2012) Cairo: R graphics device using Cairo graphics library for creating high-quality bitmap (PNG, JPEG, TIFF), vector (PDF, SVG, PostScript) and display (X11 and Win32) output. R package version 1.5–6. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Cairo

  • Vandermeer J (2011) The ecology of agroecosystems. Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter GH (2003) Insect pest management and ecological research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler AGJ (2001) Biology of the plant bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae), pests, predators. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler K, Wäckers FL, Termorshuizen AJ, van Lenteren JC (2010) Assessing risks and benefits of floral supplements in conservation biological control. BioControl 55:719–727

  • Zuur A, Ieno E, Elphick C (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Sten Segerslätt and Stig Larsson from European Willow Breeding AB for providing the northwest site. JS is most grateful for funding from the Helge Ax:son Johnsons Foundation that made this study possible. Matthieu Laurent and Carol V. Amaya-Gómez provided technical assistance. This study was further funded by the Swedish Energy Agency (Energimyndigheten) and the Swedish Research Agency Formas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg G. Stephan.

Additional information

Handling Editor: S. Raghu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 55 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stephan, J.G., Albertsson, J., Wang, L. et al. Weeds within willow short-rotation coppices alter the arthropod community and improve biological control of the blue willow beetle. BioControl 61, 103–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-015-9693-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-015-9693-0

Keywords

Navigation