Abstract
Organic management of crops generally leads to greater predator richness. However conservation of natural enemy species richness does not consistently strengthen herbivore suppression. Here we explored relationships between abundance and diversity of predatory spiders with two distinct foraging strategies and their prey, leafhopper pests. In three organic tea plantations, we investigated abundance of these spiders, and population dynamics of an important tea green leafhopper pest, Empoasca vitis (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). We found that abundance and diversity of actively hunting spiders were significantly negatively correlated with leafhopper pest populations, but sit-and-wait spiders were not. The latter may have been limited by intraguild predation or other trophic interactions. Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between total spider and leafhopper numbers. Our study thus suggests that predator foraging strategy might be a key functional trait that can help to explain variation in pest suppression in agricultural systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cardoso P, Pekár S, Jocqué R, Coddington JA (2011) Global patterns of guild composition and functional diversity of spiders. PLoS ONE 6:e21710
Chalcraft DR, Resetarits WJ (2003) Predator identity and ecological impacts: functional redundancy or functional diversity? Ecology 84:2407–2418
Cresswell W, Lind J, Quinn JL (2010) Predator-hunting success and prey vulnerability: quantifying the spatial scale over which lethal and non-lethal effects of predation occur. J Anim Ecol 79:556–562
Faith DP, Minchin PR, Belbin L (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69:57–68
Finke DL, Denno RF (2004) Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature 429:407–410
Flohre A, Fischer C, Aavik T, Bengtsson J, Berendse F, Bommarco R, Ceryngier P, Clement LW, Dennis C, Eggers S, Emmerson M, Geiger F, Guerrero I, Hawro V, Inchausti P, Liira J, Morales MB, Onate JJ, Part T, Weisser WW, Winqvist C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2011) Agricultural intensification and biodiversity partitioning in European landscapes comparing plants, carabids, and birds. Ecol Appl 21:1772–1781
Gardiner MM, Landis DA, Gratton C, DiFonzo CD, O’Neal M, Chacon JM, Wayo MT, Schmidt NP, Mueller EE, Heimpel GE (2009a) Landscape diversity enhances biological control of an introduced crop pest in the north-central USA. Ecol Applic 19:143–154
Gardiner MM, Landis DA, Gratton C, Schmidt NP, O’Neal M, Mueller EE, Chacon JM, Heimpel GE, DiFonzo CD (2009b) Landscape composition influences patterns of native and exotic lady beetle abundance. Divers Distrib 15:554–564
Griffin JN, Byrnes JEK, Cardinale BJ (2013) Effects of predator richness on prey suppression: a meta-analysis. Ecology 94:2180–2187
Hillstrom ML, Lindroth RL (2008) Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and ozone alter forest insect abundance and community composition. Insect Conserv Diver 1:233–241
Hodkinson ID (2005) Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community responses to altitude. Biol Rev 80:489–513
Hu KM, She YP, Zhu QZ, Wang JF (2005) Long-term changes of tea green leafhopper in tea gardens of southern Yunnan. Subtrop Agric Res 1:49–52
Huey RB, Pianka ER (1981) Ecological consequences of foraging mode. Ecology 62:991–999
Letourneau DK, Jedlicka JA, Bothwell SG, Moreno CR (2009) Effects of natural enemy biodiversity on the suppression of arthropod herbivores in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:573–592
Macfadyen S, Gibson R, Polaszek A, Morris RJ, Craze PG, Planque R, Symondson WOC, Memmott J (2009) Do differences in food web structure between organic and conventional farms affect the ecosystem service of pest control? Ecol Lett 12:229–238
Murphy F, Murphy J (2000) An introduction to the spiders of south east Asia. United Selangor Press Sdn. Bhd, Selangor
Novotny V (1994) Association of polyphagy in leafhoppers (Auchenorrhyncha, Hemiptera) with unpredictable environments. Oikos 70:223–232
Östman O (2004) The relative effects of natural enemy abundance and alternative prey abundance on aphid predation rates. Biol Control 30:281–287
Paredes D, Cayuela L, Gurr GM, Campos M (2015) Single best species or natural enemy assemblages? A correlational approach to investigating ecosystem function. BioControl 60:37–45
Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002) Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol Lett 5:402–411
Poveda K, Martínez E, Kersch-Becker MF, Bonilla MA, Tscharntke T (2012) Landscape simplification and altitude affect biodiversity, herbivory and Andean potato yield. J Appl Ecol 49:513–522
R Development Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available online at: http://www.R-project.org
Rand TA, van Veen FJF, Tscharntke T (2012) Landscape complexity differentially benefits generalized fourth, over specialized third, trophic level natural enemies. Ecography 35:97–104
Rasmann S, Pellissier L, Defossez E, Jactel H, Kunstler G (2014) Climate-driven change in plant–insect interactions along elevation gradients. Funct Ecol 28:46–54
Riechert SE, Lockley T (1984) Spiders as biological-control agents. Annu Rev Entomol 29:299–320
Rusch A, Bommarco R, Chiverton P, Oberg S, Wallin H, Wiktelius S, Ekbom B (2013) Response of ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) communities to changes in agricultural policies in Sweden over two decades. Agric Ecosyst Environ 176:63–69
Schmitz OJ (2008) Effects of predator hunting mode on grassland ecosystem function. Science 319:952–954
Schmitz OJ (2009) Effects of predator functional diversity on grassland ecosystem function. Ecology 90:2339–2345
Schmitz OJ, Barton BT (2014) Climate change effects on behavioral and physiological ecology of predator–prey interactions: implications for conservation biological control. Biol Control 75:87–96
Schmitz OJ, Suttle KB (2001) Effects of top predator species on direct and indirect interactions in a food web. Ecology 82:2072–2081
Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Labs Tech J 27:623–656
Snyder WE, Chang GC, Prasad RP (2005) Conservation biological control: Biodiversity influences the effectiveness of predators. In: Barbosa P, Castellanos I (eds) Ecology of predator-prey interactions. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 324–343
Straub CS (2006) Exploring the relationship between natural enemy biodiversity and herbivore suppression. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Entomology. Washington State University, Pullman
Straub CS, Snyder WE (2006) Species identity dominates the relationship between predator biodiversity and herbivore suppression. Ecology 87:277–282
Straub CS, Finke DL, Snyder WE (2008) Are the conservation of natural enemy biodiversity and biological control compatible goals? Biol Control 45:225–237
Ye HX, Cui L, He XM, Han BY (2010) Effect of intercropping tea with citrus, waxberry, or snake gourd on population density and spatial distribution of the tea green leafhopper and araneids. Acta Ecol Sinica 30:6019–6026
Acknowledgments
We thank Gan Wenjin, Li Qiaoshun, Chen Zhiling, Hou Guoyan, Li Yonggang and Wang Jin for helping field and lab work. We appreciate the support from Long Sheng of Yunnan Incorporated Company. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grant # 41271278 and the CAS 135 program (XTBG-T01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Handling Editor: Marta Montserrat.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, S., Li, Z., Sui, Y. et al. Spider foraging strategies dominate pest suppression in organic tea plantations. BioControl 60, 839–847 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-015-9691-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-015-9691-2