Skip to main content
Log in

Robust auction design under multiple priors by linear and integer programming

  • S.I.: Advances of OR in Commodities and Financial Modelling
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is commonly assumed in the optimal auction design literature that valuations of buyers are independently drawn from a unique distribution. In this paper we study auctions under ambiguity, that is, in an environment where valuation distribution is uncertain itself, and present a linear programming approach to robust auction design problem with a discrete type space. We develop an algorithm that gives the optimal solution to the problem under certain assumptions when the seller is ambiguity averse with a finite prior set \({\mathcal {P}}\) and the buyers are ambiguity neutral with a prior \(f\in {\mathcal {P}}\). We also consider the case where all parties, the buyers and the seller, are ambiguity averse, and formulate this problem as a mixed integer programming problem. Then, we propose a hybrid algorithm that enables to compute an optimal solution for the problem in reduced time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A full insurance mechanism is one where the ex-post pay-off of a given type of bidder does not vary with the report of a competing bidder.

References

  • Bandi, C., & Bertsimas, D. (2014). Optimal design for multi-item auctions: A robust optimization approach. Mathematics of Operations Research, 39(4), 1012–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose, S., Ozdenoren, E., & Pape, A. (2006). Optimal auctions with ambiguity. Theoretical Economics, 1(4), 411–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(2), 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, L., & Reiter, S. (2006). Designing economic mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. (1999). Auction theory: A guide to the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(3), 227–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, V. (2009). Auction theory. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, K. C. (1998). Sealed bid auctions with uncertainty averse bidders. Economic Theory, 12(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B. (1981). Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6(1), 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. G., & Samuelson, W. F. (1981). Optimal auctions. The American Economic Review, 71(4), 381–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salo, A., & Weber, M. (1995). Ambiguity aversion in first-price sealed-bid auctions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 11(2), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of Finance, 16(1), 8–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vohra, R. V. (2011). Mechanism design: A linear programming approach (Vol. 47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vohra, R. V. (2012). Optimization and mechanism design. Mathematical Programming, 134(1), 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Ç. Pınar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koçyiğit, Ç., Bayrak, H.I. & Pınar, M.Ç. Robust auction design under multiple priors by linear and integer programming. Ann Oper Res 260, 233–253 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2416-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2416-4

Keywords

Navigation