Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intercropping teak (Tectona grandis) and maize (Zea mays): bioeconomic trade-off analysis of agroforestry management practices in Gunungkidul, West Java

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Producing high quality timber meeting export standards requires intensive tree management. Using a tree-crop interactions model (WaNuLCAS) we analyzed tree management practices in intercropped teak (Tectona grandis) and maize (Zea mays) compared to teak and maize monocultures. Tradeoff analysis in intercropped teak and maize was designed in a three-treatment factorial: initial teak density (1600 trees ha−1 (2.5 m × 2.5 m), 1111 trees ha−1 (3 m × 3 m) and 625 trees ha−1 (4 m × 4 m)), thinning intensity (light (25 %), moderate (50 %) and heavy (75 %) of tree density), and pruning intensity (40 % and 60 % of crown biomass). Cumulative maize yield in the first 5 years of teak growth increased 10–38 % when tree density was reduced. All simulated intercropping practices produced a higher wood volume than a monoculture, as trees benefit from crop fertilization. Maximum wood volume (m3 ha−1) was obtained at initial tree density of 625 trees ha−1, 25 % of which was thinned in year 5 and another 25 % in year 15 with 40 % of the crown pruned in years 4, 10 and 15. However, greater stem diameter as can be obtained with further thinning is rewarded with higher market price per volume of wood. Profitability analysis taking into account the cost of labour (for maize production, thinning and pruning) and its effect on additional timber revenue showed that the highest net present value and return to labour was provided by the system with 50 % thinning in year 5. Economic optimization was not sensitive to variations around the default price assumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Affendy H, Tan MS, Assis K, Mohammad Amizi A (2013) Economic viability of Tectona grandis sole cropping and intercropping for 20 years planting project. Res J Agric For Sci 1(3):22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertomeu M, Roshetko JM, Rahayu S (2011) Optimum pruning strategies for reducing crop suppression in a gmelina-maize smallholder agroforestry system in claveria, philippines. Agrofor Syst 83:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BPS Gunung Kidul (2007) Gunung kidul in numbers year 2007 (In Indonesian). Statistics Bureau in cooperation with District Development Planning Agency. Gunung Kidul. Wonosari

  • Djagbletey GD, Bredu SA (2007) Adoption of agroforestry by small scale teak farmers in Ghana-the case of nkoranza district. Ghana J For 20:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittinger JP (1982) Economic analysis of agricultural projects, 2nd edn. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanninen M, Pe´rezb D, Monterob M, Vı´quezc E (2004) Intensity and timing of the first thinning of Tectona grandis plantations in Costa Rica: results of a thinning trial. For Ecol Manag 203:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khasanah N, Lusiana B, Suprayogo D, van Noordwijk M, Cadisch G (2010) Exploration of tree management options to manipulate tree and crop interaction trade-off using WaNuLCAS model. World Agroforestry Centre-ICRAF, SEA Regional Office, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollert W and Cherubini L (2012) Teak resources and market assessment 2010 (Tectona grandis Linn. F.). Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. http://www.fao.org/forestry/plantedforests/67508@170537/en/

  • Kumar BM, Kumar SS, Fisher RF (1998) Intercropping teak with Leucaena increases tree growth and modifies soil characteristics. Agrofor Syst 42:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loague K, Green RE (1991) Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and application. J Contam Hydrol 7:51–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monke E, Pearson SR (1989) The policy analysis matrix for agricultural development. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthuri CW, Ong CK, Black CR, Mati BM, Ngumi VW, van Noordwijk M (2004) Modelling the effect of leaving phenology on growth and water use by selected agroforestry tree species in semi arid Kenya. Land Water Resour Res 4:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Noda I, Himmapan W, Furuya N, Pusudsavang A (2012) Profitability of combined farm management with teak plantations in Northeast Thailand. JIRCAS Working Report No. 74

  • Ola-Adams BA (1990) Influence of spacing on growth and yield of Tectona grandis linn. F. (teak) and terminalia superba engl. & dbels (afara). J Trop For Sci 2(3):180–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey D, Brown C (2000) Teak: a global overview, an overview of global teak resources and issues affecting their future outlook. Unasylva 51(201):22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdana A, Roshetko JM, Kurniawan I (2012) Forces of competition: smallholding teak producers in Indonesia. Int For Rev 14(2):238–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez D, Kanninen M (2005) Effect of thinning on stem form and wood characteristics of teak (Tectona grandis) in a humid tropical site in costa rica. Silva Fenn 39(2):217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perhutani (2011) Annual Report 2011. Perum Perhutani, Jakarta

  • Pinto LFG, Bernardes MS, Van Noordwijk M, Pereira AR, Lusiana B, Mulia R (2005) Simulation of agroforestry systems with sugarcane in Piracicaba, Brazil. Agric Syst 86:275–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roshetko JM and GES Manurung (2009) Smallholder Teak Production Systems in Gunungkidul, Indonesia. Poster presented at the 2nd World Congress of Agroforestry, Nairobi

  • Roshetko JM, Rohadi D, Perdana A, Sabastian G, Nuryartono N, Pramono AA, Widyani N, Manalu P, Fauzi MA, Sumardamto P, Kusumowardhani N (2013) Teak agroforestry systems for livelihood enhancement, industrial timber production, and environmental rehabilitation. For Trees Livelihoods 22(4):251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Martin F, van Noordwijk M (2009) Trade-offs analysis for possible timber-based agroforestry scenarios using native trees in the Philippines. Agrofor Syst 76:555–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Martin F, van Noordwijk M (2011) Is native timber tree intercropping an economically feasible alternative for smallholder farmers in the Philippines?. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 55:257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M, Lusiana B (1999) WaNuLCAS a model of water, nutrient and light capture in agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 43:217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M, Mulia R (2002) Functional branch analysis as tool for scaling above and belowground trees for their additive and non-additive properties. Ecol Model 149:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M, Lusiana B, Khasanah N, Mulia R (2011) WaNuLCAS version 4.0, background on a model of water nutrient and light capture in agroforestry systems. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Viquez E, Perez D (2005) Effect of pruning on tree growth, yield, and wood properties of Tectona grandis plantations in costa rica. Silva Fenn 39(3):381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker AP, van Noordwijk M, Cadisch G (2008) Modelling of planted legume fallows in Western Kenya. (II) Productivity and sustainability of simulated management strategies. Agrofor Syst 74:143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise R, Cacho O (2005) A bioeconomic analysis of carbon sequestration in farm forestry: a simulation study of Gliricidia sepium. Agrofor Syst 64:237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wösten JHM, Finke PA, Jansen MJW (1995) Comparison of class and continuous pedotransfer functions to generate soil hydraulic characteristics. Geoderma 66:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) through the “Improving economic outcomes for smallholders growing teak in agroforestry systems in Indonesia” (FST/2005/177) and “Development of timber and non-timber forest products’ production and market strategies for improvement of smallholders’ livelihoods in Indonesia” (FST/2012/039) projects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ni’matul Khasanah.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 8 in Appendix.

Table 8 Detail tree growth characteristic applied in the model

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khasanah, N., Perdana, A., Rahmanullah, A. et al. Intercropping teak (Tectona grandis) and maize (Zea mays): bioeconomic trade-off analysis of agroforestry management practices in Gunungkidul, West Java. Agroforest Syst 89, 1019–1033 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9832-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9832-8

Keywords

Navigation