Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CYANOCOST special issue on cyanobacterial blooms: synopsis—a critical review of the management options for their prevention, control and mitigation

  • Published:
Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nuisance, toxic cyanobacterial blooms are a persistent and globally expanding problem. Prevention of blooms requires that external and internal sources of nutrients are managed to levels where development of cyanobacterial blooms is restricted. Control of blooms, in which their presence is reduced to a level where they no longer pose a risk through additional measures such as biomanipulation or artificial mixing, demands that three elements come together: (1) understanding of the key ecological traits of the dominant cyanobacteria taxa, (2) system analysis of the lake, in particular its morphometry, water and nutrient balance, (3) adequate design and execution of the management methods of choice. All three elements are important for choosing effective management interventions and predicting their outcome. Mitigation of blooms reduces the risks and harmful effects of blooms if they cannot be prevented or sufficiently controlled, methods such as harvesting of surface scums or application of cyanocides may be used in those cases where water quality improvement is urgent. Ultimately, managing cyanobacterial blooms is most effective in the context of developing a Water Safety Plan. This is a risk assessment and management approach developed by the World Health Organization and provides a platform for bringing together the stakeholders who have a say about activities in the catchment causing eutrophication. Together, they can develop and implement control measures in the chain from catchment to drinking-water offtake which effectively mitigate eutrophication and thus protect humans and the lake ecosystem services they rely on from effects of toxic cyanobacteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We define blooms as an elevated cyanobacterial biomass that is above the biomass in the reference state of a given lake—admittedly not always easy to define—and which interferes with the ecosystem functioning and—services of this lake. Cyanobacteria are part of the normal plankton community of a lake, so it is not their presence per se, but the level of their biomass that defines—nuisance—blooms.

References

  • Adrian R, OReilly C, Zagarese H et al (2009) Lakes as sentinels of climate change. Limnol Oceanogr 84:2283–2297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antenucci JP, Ghadouani A, Burford MA, Romero JR (2005) The long-term effect of artificial destratification on phytoplankton species composition in a subtropical reservoir. Freshwater Biol 50:1081–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker ES, Hilt S (2016) Impact of water level fluctuations on cyanobacterial blooms: options for management. Aquat Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-015-9556-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormans M, Condie SA (1998) Modelling the distribution of Anabaena and Melosira in a stratified river weir pool. Hydrobiologia 364:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bormans M, Maršálek B, Jančula D (2016) Controlling internal phosphorus loading in lakes by physical methods to reduce cyanobacterial blooms—a review. Aquat Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-015-9564-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling LC, Baker PD (1996) Major cyanobacterial bloom in the Barwon–Darling river, Australia, in 1991, and underlying limnological conditions. Mar Freshwater Res 47:643–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Anglada LV (2015) Editorial on the special issue “Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) and Public Health: Progress and Current Challenges”. Toxins 7:4437–4441

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dakos V, Scheffer M, van Nes EH, Brovkin V, Petoukhov V, Held H (2008) Slowing down as an early warning signal for abrupt climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 38:14308–14312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Senerpont Domis LND, Elser JJ, Gsell AS, Huszar VLM, Ibelings BW, Jeppesen E, Kosten S, Mooij WM, Roland F, Sommer U, van Donk E, Winder M, Lurling M (2013) Plankton dynamics under different climate conditions in tropical freshwater systems (a reply to the comment by Sarmento, Amado and Descy 2013). Freshwater Biol 58:2211–2213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionisio-Pires LMD, Karlsson KM, Meriluoto JAO, Kardinaal E, Visser PM, Siewertsen K, Van Donk E, Ibelings BW (2004) Assimilation and depuration of microcystin-LR by the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha. Aquat Toxicol 69:385–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas GB, Hamilton DP, Robb MS et al (2016) Guiding principles for the development and application of solid phase phosphorus-adsorbents for freshwater ecosystems. Aquat Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-016-9575-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Fastner J, Abella S, Litt A et al (2016) Combating cyanobacterial proliferation by avoiding or treating inflows with high P load—experiences from eight case studies. Aquat Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-015-9558-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton DP, Salmaso N, Pearl HW (2016) Mitigating harmful cyanobacterial blooms: strategies for control of nitrogen and phosphorus loads. Aquat Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-016-9594-z

  • Hipsey MR, Hamilton DP, Hanson PC et al (2015) Predicting the resilience and recovery of aquatic systems: a framework for model evolution within environmental observatories. Water Resour Res 51:7023–7043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman J, Sharples J, Stroom JM, Visser PM, Kardinaal WEA, Verspagen JMH (2004) Changes in turbulent mixing shift competition for light between phytoplankton species. Ecology 85:2960–2970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibelings BW, Fastner J, Bormans M, Visser PM (2016) Cyanobacterial blooms, ecology, prevention, control, mitigation: Editorial to a CYANOCOST Special Issue. Ecol Appl. doi:10.1007/s10452-016-9595-y

  • Ibelings BW, Admiraal W, Bijkerk R, Ietswaart T, Prins H (1998) Monitoring of algae in Dutch rivers: does it meet its goals? J Appl Phycol 2:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibelings BW, Portielje R, Lammens EHRR, Noordhuis R, van den Berg MS, Joosse W, Meijer ML (2007) Resilience of alternative stable states during the recovery of shallow lakes from eutrophication: Lake Veluwe as a case study. Ecosystems 10:4–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibelings BW, Backer LC, Kardinaal WEA, Chorus I (2014) Current approaches to cyanotoxin risk assessment and risk management around the globe. Harmful Algae 40:63–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen E, Johnes PJ (2016) Obituary: Brian Moss (1943–2016). Hydrobiologia 778:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen E, Meerhoff M, Jacobsen BA, Hansen RS, Sondergaard M, Jensen JP, Lauridsen TL, Mazzeo N, Branco CWC (2007) Restoration of shallow lakes by nutrient control and biomanipulation—the successful strategy varies with lake size and climate. Hydrobiologia 581:269–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kasprzak P, Benndorf J, Gonsiorczyk T, Koschel R, Krienitz L, Mehner T, Hülsmann S, Schultz H, Wagner A (2007) Reduction of nutrient loading and biomanipulation as tools in water quality management: long-term observations on Bautzen Reservoir and Feldberger Haussee (Germany). Lake Reserv Manage 23:410–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoll LB, Sarnelle O, Hamilton SK, Kissman CEH, Wilson AE, Rose JB, Morgan MR (2008) Invasive zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) increase cyanobacterial toxin concentrations in low-nutrient lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 3:448–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litchman E, Klausmeier C (2007) A trait-based community ecology of phytoplankton. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:615–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lürling M, Mackay E, Reitzel K, Spears BM (2016a) Editorial—a critical perspective on geo-engineering for eutrophication management in lakes. Water Res 97:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lürling M, Waajen G, de Senerpont Domis LN (2016b) Evaluation of several end-of-pipe measures proposed to control cyanobacteria. Aquat Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-015-9563-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantzouki E, Visser PM, Bormans M, Ibelings BW (2016) Understanding the key ecological traits of cyanobacteria as a basis for their management and control in changing lakes. Aquat Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-015-9526-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthijs HCP, Jančula D, Visser PM, Marsalek B (2016) Existing and emerging cyanocidal comppunds, new perspectives for cyanobacterial bloom mitigation. Aquat Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-016-9577-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovic SM, Hardwick L, Dorani F (2011) Use of flow management to mitigate cyanobacterial blooms in the Lower Darling River, Australia. J Plankt Res 2:229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noordhuis R, van Zuidam BG, Peeters ETHM, Van Geest G (2016) Further improvements in water quality of the Dutch Borderlakes: two types of clear states at different nutrient levels. Aquat Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-015-9521-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomati F, Jokela J, Veronesi M, Ibelings BW (2011) An automated platform for phytoplankton ecology and aquatic ecosystem monitoring. Environ Sci Technol 45:9658–9665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds C, Dokulil M, Padisak J (2000) Understanding the assembly of phytoplankton in relation to the trophic spectrum: where are we now? Hydrobiologia 424:147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma NK, Rai AK, Stal LJ et al (2014) Costs of harmful blooms of cyanobacteria. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivonen K, Jones G (1999) Cyanobacterial Toxins. In: Chorus I, Bartram J (eds) Toxic cyanobacteria in water. A guide to their public health consequences, monitoring and management. E&FN Spon, London, pp 41–111

  • Spears BM, Maberly SC, Pan G et al (2014) Geo-engineering in lakes: a crisis of confidence? Environ Sci Technol 48:9977–9979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stroom JM, Kardinaal WEA (2016) How to combat cyanobacterial blooms: strategy toward preventive lake restoration and reactive control measures. Aquat Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-016-9593-0

  • Triest L, Stiers I, Van Onsem S (2016) Biomanipulation as a nature based solution to reduce cyanobacterial blooms. Aquat Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-015-9548-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dolah ER, Paolisso M, Sellner K, Place A (2016) Employing a socio-ecological systems approach to engage HAB stakeholders. Aquat Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-015-9562-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Verspagen JHM, Passarge J, Johnk KD, Visser PM, Peperzal L, Boers P, Laanbroek HJ, Huisman J (2006) Water management strategies against toxic Microcystis blooms in the Dutch Delta. Ecol Appl 16:313–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Visser PM, Ibelings BW, Vanderveer B, Koedood J, Mur LR (1996) Artificial mixing prevents nuisance blooms of the cyanobacterium Microcystis in Lake Nieuwe Meer, the Netherlands. Freshwater Biol 2:435–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser PM, Ibelings BW, Bormans M, Huisman J (2016) Artificial mixing to control cyanobacterial blooms: a review. Aquat Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-015-9537-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Weathers K, Hanson PC, Arzberger P et al (2012) The Global Lake Ecology Observatory Network (GLEON): the evolution of grassroots science. Limnol Oceanogr Bull 22:71–73

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This Special Issue of Aquatic Ecology was developed as a product of the CYANOCOST Action, and we are grateful for the opportunity CYANOCOST has given us to put this Issue together, as well as for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute F.-A Forel and Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, 66 Boulevard Carl Vogt, 1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland

    Bastiaan W. Ibelings

  2. CNRS/Université de Rennes, 1 Campus de Beaulieu, bat 14B UMR ECOBIO, 35042, Rennes, France

    Myriam Bormans

  3. German Environment Agency, Corrensplatz 1, 14195, Berlin, Germany

    Jutta Fastner

  4. Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Sciencepark 904, 1090 GE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Petra M. Visser

Authors
  1. Bastiaan W. Ibelings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Myriam Bormans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jutta Fastner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Petra M. Visser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bastiaan W. Ibelings.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Piet Spaak.

Guest editors: Petra M. Visser, Bas W. Ibelings, Jutta Fastner and Myriam Bormans/Cyanobacterial blooms. Ecology, prevention, mitigation and control.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibelings, B.W., Bormans, M., Fastner, J. et al. CYANOCOST special issue on cyanobacterial blooms: synopsis—a critical review of the management options for their prevention, control and mitigation. Aquat Ecol 50, 595–605 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-016-9596-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-016-9596-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation