Skip to main content
Log in

A New Stationary Phase for Analysis of Hydrophobic Compounds by RP-LC

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydrophobic selectivity is a key factor that has made C18-bonded phases the main separation materials for HPLC since its development. However, hydrophobic compounds tend to be strongly retained in these phases meaning that large amounts of organic mobile phases are required. In this work, a new stationary phase was prepared from the immobilization of poly(dimethyl-co-alkylmethylsiloxane) (PDAS) over silica particles using microwave radiation. The optimized conditions for preparation of the stationary phase used 720 W of radiation for 10 min. The chromatographic performance and methylene selectivity in the separation of hydrophobic compounds by this new Si(PDAS) phase were similar to those obtained by typical C18-bonded phases. However, the lower hydrophobicity of the organic layer in the Si(PDAS) phase resulted in separation about 40 % faster than typical C18 phases, requiring more aqueous mobile phases. The Si(PDAS) phase showed lower silanophilic activity than that of typical C18 phases due to a more effective polymeric coating of the silica surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirkland J (2004) J Chromatogr A 1060:9–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanaka N, Nagayama H, Kobayashi H, Ikegami T, Hosoya K, Ishizuka N, Minakuchi H, Nakanishi K, Cabrera K, Lubda D (2000) J High Resolut Chromatogr 23:111–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Qiu HD, Liang XJ, Sun M, Jiang SX (2011) Anal Bioanal Chem 399:3307–3322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fekete S, Oláh E, Fekete J (2012) J Chromatogr A 1228:57–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang XJ, Wang S, Liu SJ, Liu X, Jiang SX (2012) J Sep Sci 35:2003–2009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schure MR, Rafferty JL, Zhang L, Siepmann JI (2013) LC-GC N Am 31:630–637

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Löchmuller CH, Wilder DR (1979) J Chromatogr Sci 17:574–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sándi Á, Bede Á, Szepesy L, Rippel G (1997) Chromatographia 45:206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Strohschein S, Pursch M, Lubda D, Albert K (1988) Anal Chem 70:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Buszewski B, Kowalska S, Stepnowski P (2006) J Sep Sci 29:1116–1125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tonhi E, Collins KE, Collins CH (2006) J Chromatogr A 1119:135–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Leo AJ (1987) J Pharmacol Sci 76:166–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hayward SJ, Lei YD, Wania F (2006) Environ Toxicol Chem 25:2018–2027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Faria AM, Collins CH, Jardim ICSF (2009) J Braz Chem Soc 20:1385–1398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Begnini FR, Jardim ICSF (2013) J Chromatogr A 1297:113–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. da Silva CGA, Collins CH, Lesellier E, West C (2013) J Chromatogr A 1315:176–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dib SR, Faria AM (2014) Chromatographia 77:533–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Silva RB, Gushikem Y, Collins CH (2001) J Sep Sci 24:49–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Faria AM, Collins KE, Collins CH (2007) J Chromatogr A 1156:51–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Borges EM, Collins CH (2012) J Chromatogr A 1227:174–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lopes NP, Collins KE, Jardim ICSF (2004) J Chromatogr A 1030:225–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morais LSR, Jardim ICSF (2005) J Chromatogr A 1073:127–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Collins CH, Silva CR, Faria AM, Collins KE, Jardim ICSF (2009) J Braz Chem Soc 20:604–612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Novais AS, Ribeiro Filho JF, Amaral EMF, Faria AM (2015) Quim Nova 38:274–279. doi:10.5935/0100-4042.20140312

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kimata K, Iwaguchi K, Onishi S, Jinno K, Eksteen R, Hosoya K, Arki M, Tanaka N (1989) J Chromatogr Sci 27:721–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bachmann S, Melo LFC, Silva RB, Anazawa TA, Jardim ICSF, Collins KE, Collins CH, Albert K (2001) Chem Mater 13:1874–1879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Instituto de Química at the Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP, São Paulo, Brazil) for some spectroscopic characterizations and for the column packing. The authors thank FAPEMIG (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais) and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) for fellowships and financial support. This work is a collaboration research project of members of the Rede Mineira de Química (RQ-MG) supported by FAPEMIG (Project: CEX-RED-00010-14).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anizio M. Faria.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carvalho, G.O., da Silva, C.G.A. & Faria, A.M. A New Stationary Phase for Analysis of Hydrophobic Compounds by RP-LC. Chromatographia 79, 19–27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-015-2993-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-015-2993-9

Keywords

Navigation