Abstract
In this paper, we present an efficiency improvement for the algorithm called AMOEBA, A Multidirectional Optimum Ecotope-Based Algorithm, devised by Aldstadt and Getis (Geogr Anal 38(4):327–343, 2006). AMOEBA embeds a local spatial autocorrelation statistic in an iterative procedure in order to identify spatial clusters (ecotopes) of related spatial units. We provide an analysis of the computational complexity of the original AMOEBA and develop an alternative formulation that reduces computational time without losing optimality. Empirical evidence is provided using georeferenced socio-demographic data in Accra, Ghana.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A collection of statistical tests for cluster detection is available in a software package named GeoSurveillance. See Yamada et al. (2009) for more information about this software.
The power set of a set M is the set of all subsets of M.
Other options to generate different spatial clustering patterns, like the spiral or linear clustering pattern, can be found in Jackson et al. (2010).
NumPy provides a wide variety of mathematical functions needed for scientific computing with Python (Oliphant 2006).
The algorithm as a Python module is also available from the authors on request.
For each instance we generated 1,000 random permutations to perform the Monte Carlo-type permutation test.
This is because the percentage of areas that are assigned to be part of clusters is fixed, which implies that a larger number of clusters results in smaller cluster size.
References
Aldstadt J (2010) Spatial clustering. In: Fischer M, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 279–300
Aldstadt J, Getis A (2006) Using AMOEBA to create a spatial weights matrix and identify spatial clusters. Geogr Anal 38(4):327–343
Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geogr Anal 27(2):93–115
Fotheringham S, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2000) Quantitative geography: perspectives on spatial data analysis. Sage Publications, London
Gaudart J, Poudiougou B, Ranque S, Doumbo O (2005) Oblique decision trees for spatial pattern detection: optimal algorithm and application to malaria risk. BMC Medical Research Methodology. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-22
Getis A, Ord J (1992) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 24(3):189–206
Jackson MC, Huang L, Xie Q, Tiwari RC (2010) A modified version of Moran’s I. Int J Health Geograp. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-9-33
Jacquez G (2009) Cluster morphology analysis. Spat Spattemporal Epidemiol 1(1):19–29
Knox E (1989) Detection of clusters. In: Elliot P (eds) Methodology of enquiries into disease clustering. Small Area Health Statistics Unit, London, pp 17–22
Oliphant T (2006) Guide to NumPy. Trelgol Publishing, USA
Ord J, Getis A (1995) Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: Distributional issues and application. Geogr Anal 27(4):286–306
Robinson W (1950) Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. Am Sociol Rev 15(3):351–357
Tango T, Takahashi K (2005) A flexibly shaped spatial scan statistic for detecting clusters. Int J Health Geogr. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-4-11
Wu J, Kendrick K, Feng J (2007) A novel approach to detect hot-spots in large-scale multivariate data. BMC Bioinformatics. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-331
Yamada I, Rogerson P, Lee G (2009) GeoSurveillance: a GIS-based system for the detection and monitoring of spatial clusters. J Geogr Syst 11(2):155–173
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Professor Dr. John Weeks, director of the International Population Center at San Diego State University, for providing us with the data for our empirical application. The usual disclaimer applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duque, J.C., Aldstadt, J., Velasquez, E. et al. A computationally efficient method for delineating irregularly shaped spatial clusters. J Geogr Syst 13, 355–372 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-010-0137-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-010-0137-1