Abstract
Background
Epigastric herniation is a common, though not always symptomatic condition. It is likely, that in accordance to the tension-free principles for other hernias, epigastric hernia repair should be mesh based.
Methods
Patients from two large hospitals were investigated retrospectively if they were operated on an epigastric hernia for the past 6 years. Follow-up was completed with a postal questionnaire.
Results
A total of 235 patients (50 % male) were operated. Sixty-eight patients were operated with mesh and 167 patients with suture repair. Forty-six patients were loss-to follow-up (19.6 %). In the mesh operated patients the recurrence rate was 10.9 % (n = 6) compared to 14.9 % (n = 20) in the suture repair group. Cox-regression analysis showed an increased risk for recurrence in the suture repair group (odds ratio 1.43; 95 % CI 0.56–3.57; p = 0.44). Operation time for mesh repair (47 min) was significantly longer compared to suture repair (29 min) (p < 0.0001). Thirty-seven patients had previous or other anterior wall hernias. A total of 51 patients smoked and 14 patients had diabetes mellitus. Fourteen patients used steroids and 22 patients suffered from a chronic lung disease. Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference for pain in patients in which re-operation for a recurrence occurred (p = 0.004).
Conclusions
This is one of the largest reported series on solely epigastric hernias. A recurrence occurred more often after sutured repair compared to mesh repair. No differences in chronic pain was seen between mesh and suture repaired patients. Male:female ratio of 1:1, which is different from the 3:1 ratio found in previous older smaller studies, could be more reliable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Courtney M. Townsend Jr, R. Daniel Beauchamp, B. Mark Evers, Kenneth L. Mattox (2008) Sabiston textbook of surgery. 18th edn
H. Bredan Devlin M, Andrew Knigsnorth (1998) Management of abdominal hernias. 2nd edn
Robert J. Fitzgibbons Jr M, A. Gerson Greenburg (2002) Nyhus and Condon’s hernia. 5th edn
Askar OM (1984) Aponeurotic hernias. Recent observations upon paraumbilical and epigastric hernias. Surg Clin North Am 64(2):315–333
Coats RD, Helikson MA, Burd RS (2000) Presentation and management of epigastric hernias in children. J Pediatr Surg 35(12):1754–1756
Erritzoe-Jervild L, Christoffersen MW, Helgstrand F, Bisgaard T (2013) Long-term complaints after elective repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias. Hernia 17(2):211–215
Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the international association for the study of pain, subcommittee on taxonomy (1986) Pain Suppl 3:S1–S226
Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning NKVBR (2012) Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid. http://www.nationaalkompas.nl. version 4.7, 22
Abdel-Baki NA, Bessa SS, Abdel-Razek AH (2007) Comparison of prosthetic mesh repair and tissue repair in the emergency management of incarcerated para-umbilical hernia: a prospective randomized study. Hernia 11(2):163–167
Arroyo A, Garcia P, Perez F, Andreu J, Candela F, Calpena R (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg 88(10):1321–1323
Aslani N, Brown CJ (2010) Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 14(5):455–462
Eryilmaz R, Sahin M, Tekelioglu MH (2006) Which repair in umbilical hernia of adults: primary or mesh? Int Surg 91(5):258–261
Sanjay P, Reid TD, Davies EL, Arumugam PJ, Woodward A (2005) Retrospective comparison of mesh and sutured repair for adult umbilical hernias. Hernia 9(3):248–251
Stabilini C, Stella M, Frascio M, De Salvo L, Fornaro R, Larghero G (2009) Mesh versus direct suture for the repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. Ten-year experience. Ann Ital Chir 80(3):183–187
Askar OM (1978) A new concept of the aetiology and surgical repair of paraumbilical and epigastric hernias. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 60(1):42–48
Lang B, Lau H, Lee F (2002) Epigastric hernia and its etiology. Hernia 6(3):148–150
Moschcowitz AV (1917) Epigastric hernia without palpable swelling. Ann Surg 66(3):300–307
Ponten JE, Somers KY, Nienhuijs SW (2012) Pathogenesis of the epigastric hernia. Hernia 16(6):627–633
Westen M, Christoffersen MW, Jorgensen LN, Stigaard T, Bisgaard T (2013) Chronic complaints after simple sutured repair for umbilical or epigastric hernias may be related to recurrence. Langenbecks Arch Surg
Aufenacker TJ, Schmits SP, Gouma DJ, Simons MP (2009) Do guidelines influence results in inguinal hernia treatment? A descriptive study of 2,535 hernia repairs in one teaching hospital from 1994 to 2004. Hernia 13(1):35–39
Christoffersen MW, Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Bisgaard T (2013) Lower reoperation rate for recurrence after mesh versus sutured elective repair in small umbilical and epigastric hernias. A nationwide register study. World J Surg
Muschaweck U (2003) Umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 83(5):1207–1221
Dabbas N, Adams K, Pearson K, Royle G (2011) Frequency of abdominal wall hernias: is classical teaching out of date? JRSM Short Rep 2(1):5
Ohene-Yeboah M, Abantanga F, Oppong J, Togbe B, Nimako B, Amoah M (2009) Some aspects of the epidemiology of external hernias in Kumasi, Ghana. Hernia 13(5):529–532
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank T.A. Mulders, MD, PhD; for his patience and statistical knowledge.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ponten, J.E.H., Leenders, B.J.M., Charbon, J.A. et al. A consecutive series of 235 epigastric hernias. Hernia 19, 821–825 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1227-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1227-7