Skip to main content
Log in

Retrospective comparison of mesh and sutured repair for adult umbilical hernias

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adult umbilical and paraumbilical hernia repair is associated with a high recurrence rate of 10–30%. Mesh repair has been reported to be associated with low recurrence rates. This study aims to compare sutured repair with prosthetic mesh repair to evaluate recurrence and infection rates. A retrospective study was conducted over an 8-year period including all the umbilical and paraumbilical hernia repairs performed by one consultant surgeon. The hernias were repaired using interrupted suture, Mayo overlap, flat mesh and mesh plug techniques. The study was based on case-note review, telephone and postal questionnaire survey. A total of 100 patients were studied, of which 70 had paraumbilical hernias, 28 had umbilical hernias and 2 had both types of hernia. Median age was 56 years (range 19–90 years). A total of 61 patients had suture repair (50 interrupted suture repair, 11 Mayo) and 39 had prosthetic mesh repair (33 mesh plug, 6 flat mesh). The median body mass index (BMI) was 31.2 (range 23.4–44.5) in the suture repair group and 33.3 (range 24.1–59.1) in the mesh group, with no significant statistical difference in BMI between the two groups (P>0.05). Median follow-up was 4.5 years (range 1–8 years). Recurrence rates for the suture and mesh repair groups were 11.5 and 0%, respectively (P=0.007). Infection rates for the suture and mesh repair groups were 11.5 and 0%, respectively (P=0.007). Our data suggest that prosthetic mesh repair is ideal for managing primary and recurrent umbilical hernias in both obese and non-obese patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Musca AA (1967) Umbilical and ventral herniorrhaphy: a review of 1000 cases. Part 1: characteristics which predict surgical results and predisposing factors. Int Surg 48: 169–179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenthal RA (1994) Small-bowel disorders and abdominal wall hernia in the elderly patients. Surg Clin North Am 74:261–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayo WJ (1901) An operation for the radical cure of umbilical hernia. Ann Surg 34:276–280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Courtney CA, Lee AC, Wilson C, O’Dwyer PJ (2003) Ventral hernia repair: a study of current practice. Hernia 7:44–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arroyo A, Garcia P, Perez F, Andreu J, Candela F, Calpena R (2001) Randomised clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adult. Br J Surg 88:1321–1323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sinha SN, Keith T (2004) Mesh plug repair for paraumbilical hernia. Surgeon 2:99–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurzer M, Belsham PA, Kark A (2004) Tension-free mesh repair of umbilical hernia as a day case using local anaesthesia. Hernia 8:104–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arroyo Sebastian A, Perez F, Serrano P, Costa D, Oliver I, Lacueva J, Calpena R(2002) Is prosthetic umbilical hernia repair bound to replace primary herniorrhaphy in the adult patient? Hernia 6:175–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Perrakis E, Velimezis G, Vezakis A, Antoniades J, Savanis G,Patrikakos V (2003) A new tension-free technique for the repair of umbilical hernia, using the Prolene Hernia System—early results from 48 cases. Hernia 7(4):178–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuschieri A, Giles GR, Moosa AR (1995) Essential surgical practice, 3rd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 1442–1443

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kingsnorth A (2003) Management of abdominal hernias, 3rd edn. Arnold, London, pp 228–236

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chan MK, Baillod RA, Tanner A, Raftery M, Sweny P, Fernando ON, Moorhead JF (1981) Abdominal hernias in patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Br Med J 283:826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zinner MJ, Schwartz SI, Ellis H (1997) Maingot’s abdominal operations 10th edn. Prentice Hall, London, pp 531–537

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wright BE, Beckerman J, Cohen M, Cumming JK, Rodriguez JL (2002) Is laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with mesh a reasonable alternative to conventional repair? Am J Surg 184:505–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Giuli M, Festa V, Morino M (1994) Large post-operative umbilical hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case report. Surg Endosc 8:904–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Velasco M, Garcia-Urena MA, Hidalgo M, Vega V, Carnero FJ (1999) Current concepts on adult umbilical bernia. Hernia 3:233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1989) The tension free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157:188–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gonzalez R, Mason E, Duncan T, Wilson R, Ramshaw BJ (2003) Laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 7(4):323–328

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lau H, Patil NG (2003) Umbilical hernia in adults. Surg Endosc 17(12):2016–2020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Woodward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanjay, P., Reid, T.D., Davies, E.L. et al. Retrospective comparison of mesh and sutured repair for adult umbilical hernias. Hernia 9, 1–99999 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-005-0342-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-005-0342-x

Keywords

Navigation