Abstract
We compared the electrochemical performance of various reduced graphene oxides (RGOs), including chemically reduced graphene oxide (CRGO), thermally reduced graphene oxide (TRGO), and electrochemically reduced graphene oxide (ERGO) under different reduction potentials, using aromatic species of hydroquinone and catechol as analytes. Strong adsorption of analytes on RGOs surface is found due to π-π interaction between RGOs and aromatic species. Analytical parameters of electron transfer rate, detection sensitivity, and linear response range were considered. CRGO showed the fastest heterogeneous electron transfer rate and the most wide linear range but among the poorest detection sensitivity. The different restoration extent of graphitic network, such as ERGO prepared under different reduction potentials, will also affect the sensing performance. These results will enhance our understanding of the applicability of RGOs in biosensing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wang C, Yuan R, Chai Y, Hu F (2012) Anal Methods 4:1626–1628
Li SJ, Qian C, Wang K, Hua BY, Wang FB, Sheng ZH, Xia XH (2012) Sens Actuators B chem 174:441–448
Mayorga-Martinez CC, Cadevall M, Guix M, Ros J, Merkoci A (2013) Biosens Bioelectron 40:57–62
Asan A, Isildak I (2003) J Chromatogr A 988:145–149
Li SF, Li XZ, Xu J, Wei XW (2008) Talanta 75:32–37
Moldoveanu SC, Kiser M (2007) J Chromatogr A 1141:90–97
Dong S, Chi L, Yang Z, He P, Wang Q, Fang Y (2009) J Sep Sci 32:3232–3238
Wang ZH, Li SJ, Lv QZ (2007) Sens Actuators B chem 127:420–425
Guo QH, Huang JS, Chen PQ, Liu Y, Hou HQ, You TY (2012) Sens Actuators B chem 163:179–185
Bai J, Guo LP, Ndamanisha JC, Qi B (2009) J Appl Electrochem 39:2497–2503
Zhang Y, Zheng JB (2007) Electrochim Acta 52:7210–7216
Si W, Lei W, Zhang Y, Xia M, Wang F, Hao Q (2012) Electrochim Acta 85:295–301
Li Z, Sun X, Xia Q, Li R, Fang Y, Yang S, Liu J (2012) Electrochim Acta 85:42–48
Zheng L, Xiong L, Li Y, Xu J, Kang X, Zou Z, Yang S, Xia J (2013) Sens Actuators B chem 177:344–349
Wang L, Zhang Y, Du Y, Lu D, Zhang Y, Wang C (2012) J Solid State Electrochem 16:1323–1331
Shao YY, Wang J, Wu H, Liu J, Aksay IA, Lin YH (2010) Electroanalysis 22:1027–1036
Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA (2004) Science 306:666–669
Sutter PW, Flege JI, Sutter EA (2008) Nat Mater 7:406–411
Emtsev KV, Bostwick A, Horn K, Jobst J, Kellogg GL, Ley L, McChesney JL, Ohta T, Reshanov SA, Rohrl J, Rotenberg E, Schmid AK, Waldmann D, Weber HB, Seyller T (2009) Nat Mater 8:203–207
Gilje S, Han S, Wang M, Wang KL, Kaner RB (2007) Nano Lett 7:3394–3398
Schniepp HC, Li JL, McAllister MJ, Sai H, Herrera-Alonso M, Adamson DH, Prud’homme RK, Car R, Saville DA, Aksay IA (2006) J Phys Chem B 110:8535–8539
Guo HL, Wang XF, Qian QY, Wang FB, Xia XH (2009) ACS Nano 3:2653–2659
Wu JS, Pisul W, Mullen K (2007) Chem Rev 107:718–747
Dreyer DR, Park S, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS (2010) Chem Soc Rev 39:228–240
Chee SY, Pumera M (2012) Electrochem Commun 20:141–144
Stergiou DV, Diamanti EK, Gournis D, Prodromidis MI (2010) Electrochem Commun 12:1307–1309
Punckt C, Pope MA, Liu J, Lin Y, Aksay IA (2010) Electroanalysis 22:2834–2841
Yuan B, Zeng X, Xu C, Liu L, Ma Y, Zhang D, Fan Y (2013) Sens Actuators B chem 184:15–20
Wang Z, Wu S, Zhang J, Chen P, Yang G, Zhou X, Zhang Q, Yan Q, Zhang H (2012) Nanoscale Res Lett 7:161–167
Kovtyukhova NI, Ollivier PJ, Martin BR, Mallouk TE, Chizhik SA, Buzaneva EV, Gorchinskiy AD (1999) Chem Mater 11:771–778
Hummers WS, Offeman RE (1958) J Am Chem Soc 80:1339
Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia YY, Wu Y, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS (2007) Carbon 45:1558–1565
Wang GX, Yang J, Park J, Gou XL, Wang B, Liu H, Yao J (2008) J Phys Chem C 112:8192–8195
Chen L, Tang Y, Wang K, Liu C, Luo S (2011) Electrochem Commun 13:133–137
Li SJ, Xing Y, Wang GF (2012) Microchim Acta 176:163–168
Deng DH, Li SJ, Zhang MJ, Liu XN, Zhao MM, Liu L (2013) Anal Methods 5:2536–2542
Xiu N, Yang W, Wang G, Ren J, Guo H, Gao J (2013) Electrochim Acta 98:167–175
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21105002), the Innovative project for Young Scholar sponsored by Henan province (14HASTIT012, 2013GGJS-147), Henan Key Technologies R&D Program (122102310516, 12B150002), and the Innovative Foundation for the College students of China (201310479012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOC 2569 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, SJ., Xing, Y., Deng, DH. et al. A comparative study of different types of reduced graphene oxides as electrochemical sensing platforms for hydroquinone and catechol. J Solid State Electrochem 19, 861–870 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-014-2692-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-014-2692-8