Abstract
In this note we analyze the incentives to merge in a mixed duopoly if firms compete in prices or quantities. Our model framework mainly follows Barcena-Ruiz and Garzon (J Econ 80:27–42, 2003) who set up the model with quantity competition. We extend their analysis by analyzing the case of competition in prices. Further we compare the incentives to merge with Bertrand and Cournot competition. Comparing quantity with price competition we can show that a merger is more likely with Cournot competition than with Bertrand competition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barcena-Ruiz J, Garzon M (2003) Mixed duopoly, merger and multiproduct firms. J Econ 80: 27–42
Deneckere R, Davidson C (1985) Incentives to form coalitions with Bertrand competition. RAND J Econ 4: 473–486
Ghosh A, Mitra M (2010) Comparing Cournot and Bertrand in mixed markets. Econ Lett 109: 72–74
Kamaga K, Nakamura Y (2007) The core and productivity-improving mergers in mixed oligopoly. Int J Bus Econ 6: 181–198
Kamijo Y, Nakamura y (2009) Stable market structures from merger activities in mixed oligopoly with asymmetric costs. J Econ 98: 1–24
Kreps D, Scheinkman J (1983) Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yields Cournot outcome. Bell J Econ 14: 326–337
Mendez-Naya J (2008) Merger profitability in mixed oligopoly. J Econ 94: 167–176
Nakamura Y, Inoue T (2007) Mixed oligopoly and productivity-improving mergers. Econ Bull 12: 1–9
Perry M, Porter R (1985) Oligopoly and the incentive for horizontal merger. Am Econ Rev 75: 219–227
Salant S, Switzer S, Reynolds R (1983) Losses from horizontal merger: the effects of an exogenous change in industry structure on Cournot-Nash equilibrium. Q J Econ 98: 185–199
Singh S, Vives X (1984) Losses from horizontal merger: the effects of an exogenous change in industry structure on Cournot-Nash equilibrium. RAND J Econ 15: 546–554
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andree, K. A note on merger in mixed duopoly: Bertrand versus Cournot. J Econ 108, 291–298 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-012-0280-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-012-0280-x