Skip to main content
Log in

Karyotype analysis of some Minuartia L. (Caryophyllaceae) taxa

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Karyotypic characters, mitotic metaphase chromosomes, monoploid idiograms and karyograms of Minuartia anatolica (Boiss.) Woronow var. phrygia (Bornm.) McNeill, Minuartia anatolica (Boiss.) Woronow var. scleranthoides (Boiss. & Noe) McNeill, Minuartia corymbulosa (Boiss. & Balansa) McNeill var. gypsophilloides McNeill and Minuartia aksoyi M.Koç & Hamzaoğlu were investigated for the first time. Analysis of somatic metaphases showed that the chromosome numbers and the formulas of these taxa were 2n = 24 = 14m + 6sm + 4st for Minuartia anatolica var. phrygia, 2n = 14 = 6m + 8sm for Minuartia anatolica var. scleranthoides, 2n = 14 = 6m + 4sm + 4st for Minuartia corymbulosa var. gypsophilloides and 2n = 30 = 14m + 10sm + 6st for Minuartia aksoyi. No satellites were observed in the karyotypes of these taxa. Karyotype asymmetry was estimated by many different methods, namely the Stebbins classification, the karyotype asymmetry index (As K %), the total form percent (TF %), the Rec and Syi indices, the intrachromosomal asymmetry index (A1) and interchromosomal asymmetry index (A2), the dispersion index (DI), the degree of asymmetry of karyotype (A index) and the asymmetry index (AI).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arano H (1963) Cytological studies in subfamily Carduoideae (Compositae) of Japan. IX. The karyotype analysis and phylogenic considerations on Pertya and Ainsliaea. Bot Mag Tokyo 76:32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittrich V (1993) Caryophyllaceae. In: Kubitzki K, Rohwer J, Bittrich V (eds) The families and genera of vascular plants, vol 2. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 206–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai J, Wang H, Gu ZJ, Mill RT, Li DZ (2004) Karyotypes of thirteen species of Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae) from the Hengduan Mountains region, NW Yunnan, China. Caryologia 57:337–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Çelebioglu T, Favarger C (1982) Contribution à la cytotaxonomie du genre Minuartia L. (Caryophyllacées) en Turquie et dans quelques régions voisines. Biol Ecol Medit 9:139–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Çelebioglu T, Favarger C (1983) In IOPB chromosome number reports LXXXI. Taxon 32:666–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Çelebioglu T, Favarger C (1993) Mediterranean chromosome number reports 3 (125–166). Fl Medit 3:323–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis PH, Tan K, Mill RR (1988) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol 10; suppl 1 Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 67–69

  • Huziwara Y (1962) Karyotype analysis in some genera of compositae. VIII. further studies on the chromosome of Aster. Am J Bot 49:116–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavania UC, Srivastava S (1999) Quantitative delineation of karyotype variation in Papaver as a measure of phylogenetic differentiation and origin. Curr Sci India 77:429–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Levan AK, Fredga K, Sandberg AA (1964) Nomenclature for centromic position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52:201–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill J (1967) Minuartia L. In: Davis PH (ed) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol 2. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 38–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Paszko B (2006) A critical review and a new proposal of karyotype asymmetry indices. Plant Syst Evol 258:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova D, Tosheva A (2005) Notes on karyomorphology of melilotus officinalis populations in Bulgaria. Caryologia 57:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peruzzi L, Leitch IJ, Caparelli KF (2009) Chromosome diversity and evolution in Liliaceae. Ann Bot London 103:459–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romero Zarco C (1986) A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry. Taxon 35:526–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1971) Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Venora G, Blangiforti S, Ruffini Castiglione M, Pignone D, Losavio F, Cremonini R (2002) Chromatin organisation and computer aided karyotyping of Triticum durum Desf. cv Timilia. Caryologia 55:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe K, Yahara T, Denda T, Kosuge K (1999) Chromosomal evolution in the genus Brachyscome (Asteraceae, Astereae): statistical tests regarding correlation between changes in karyotype and habit using phylogenetic information. J Plant Res 112:145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo L, Yuan Q (2011) The difference between the heterogeneity of the centromeric index and intrachromosomal asymmetry. Plant Syst Evol 297:141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Scientific Research Projects Fund of Bozok University. The project number was I.F.E-2011/50.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Halil Erhan Eroğlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eroğlu, H.E., Şimşek, N., Koç, M. et al. Karyotype analysis of some Minuartia L. (Caryophyllaceae) taxa. Plant Syst Evol 299, 67–73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0703-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0703-8

Keywords

Navigation