Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous spinal labor analgesia for two deliveries in a parturient with severe subvalvular aortic stenosis

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various degrees of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction have been seen in patients with subvalvular aortic stenosis (SAS). Regional analgesia during labor for parturients with SAS is relatively contraindicated because it has a potential risk for hemodynamic instability due to sympathetic blockade as a result of vasodilation by local anesthetics. We thought continuous spinal analgesia (CSA) using an opioid and minimal doses of local anesthetic could provide more stable hemodynamic status. We demonstrate the management of a 28-year-old pregnant patient with SAS who received CSA for her two deliveries. For her first delivery (peak pressure gradient (∆P) between LV and aorta was approximately 55 mmHg), intrathecal fentanyl was used as a basal infusion, but we needed a small amount of bupivacaine to provide supplemental intrathecal analgesia as labor progressed. Although there were mild fluctuations in hemodynamics, she was asymptomatic. For her second delivery (∆P between LV and aorta was approximately 90 mmHg), minimal doses of continuous bupivacaine were used as a basal infusion. For her additional analgesic requests, bolus co-administration of fentanyl was effective. There were no fluctuations in her hemodynamics. Although her SAS in her second pregnancy was more severe than in the first, her hemodynamics exhibited less fluctuation during the second delivery with this method. In conclusion, CSA using fentanyl combined with minimal doses of bupivacaine provided satisfactory analgesia and stable hemodynamics in parturient with severe SAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okutomi T, Kikuchi S, Amano K, Okamoto H, Hoka S. Continuous spinal analgesia for labor and delivery in a parturient with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46:329–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van de Velde M, Budts W, Vandermeersch E, Spitz B. Continuous spinal analgesia for labor pain in a parturient with aortic stenosis. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013;12:51–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moghbeli N, Pare E, Webb G. Practical assessment of maternal cardiovascular risk in pregnancy. Congenit Heart Dis. 2008;3:308–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanghavi M, Rutherford JD. Cardiovascular management in pregnancy. Cardiovasc Physiol Pregnancy. Circ. 2014;130:1003–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robson SC, Dunlop W, Boys RJ, Hunter S. Cardiac output during labor. Br Med J. 1987;295:1169–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson RC, Liberthson RR, Lowenstein E. Perioperative anesthetic risk of noncardiac surgery in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. JAMA. 1985;254:2419–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Suntharalingam G, Dob D, Yentis SM. Obstetric epidural analgesia in aortic stenosis: a low-dose technique for labour and instrumental delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2001;10:129–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Minnich ME, Quirk JG, Clark RB. Epidural anesthesia for vaginal delivery in a patient with idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis. Anesthesiology. 1987;67:590–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ho KM, Ngan Kee WD, Poon MCM. Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia in a parturient with idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:168–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abboud TK, Zhu J, Sharp R, LaGrange C, Rosa C, Kassells B. The efficacy of intrathecal injection of sufentanil using a microspinal catheter for labor analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996;40:210–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaiser RR, Cheek TG, Gutsche BB. Comparison of three different doses of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil for labor analgesia. J Clin Anesth. 1998;10:488–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Honet JE, Arkoosh VA, Norris MC, Huffnagle HJ, Silverman NS, Leighton BL. Comparison among intrathecal fentanyl, meperidine, and sufentanyl for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 1992;75:734–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Okutomi T, Mochizuki J, Amano K, Datta S. The effect of intrathecal epinephrine on epidural infused analgesics during labor. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28:108–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Muralidhar V, Kaul HL, Mallick P. Over-the-needle versus microcatheter-through-needle technique for continuous spinal anesthesia. Preliminary study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:417–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Möllman M, Van Steenberge A, Sell A, Pitkanen M, Holst D, Van Dongen A, Berg S. Spinocath, a new approach to continuous spinal anesthesia—preliminary results of a multicenter trial. Int Monit. 1996;8:74.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gosch UW, Hueppe M, Hallschmid M, Born J, Schmucker P, Meier T. Post-dural puncture in young adults: comparison of two small-gauge spinal catheters with different needle design. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:657–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiyuki Okutomi.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hyuga, S., Okutomi, T., Kato, R. et al. Continuous spinal labor analgesia for two deliveries in a parturient with severe subvalvular aortic stenosis. J Anesth 30, 1067–1070 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2238-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2238-6

Keywords

Navigation