Skip to main content
Log in

Dual inexact fuzzy chance-constrained programming for planning waste management systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study develops a dual inexact fuzzy chance-constrained programming (DIFCCP) method for planning municipal solid waste (MSW) management systems. The concept of random boundary interval (RBI) is introduced to address the high uncertain parameters in the studied system. Fuzzy flexible programming and chance-constrained programming are also introduced to take into account the uncertainties of RBIs and various uncertainties in MSW management system. Compared with the existing methods, the developed method could deal with the uncertainty without simplification and thus is more robust. Moreover, the potential system-failure risks in MSW management system due to the existing uncertainties could be quantified by means of violation levels and satisfaction levels in DIFCCP. The developed method then is applied to a MSW management system. The obtained solutions could be used for generating efficient management schemes. The values of violation and satisfaction levels could help decision makers understand the tradeoffs between system cost and system-failure risk, and identify desired strategy according to the practical economic and environmental situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babaeyan-Koopaei K, Ervine DA, Pender G (2003) Field measurements and flow modeling of overbank flows in River Severn, UK. J Environ Info 1:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byun DW, Kim ST, Cheng FY, Kim SB, Cuclis A, Moon NK (2003) Information infrastructure for air quality modeling and analysis: application to the Houston–Galveston ozone non-attainment area. J Environ Info 2:38–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanas S, Zielinski P (2000) On the equivalence of two optimization methods for fuzzy linear programming problems. Eur J Oper Res 21:56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang NB, Lu HY (1997) A new approach for long-term planning of solid waste management system using fuzzy global criterion. J Environ Sci Health (A) 2:1025–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang NB, Wang SF (1995) Solid waste management system analysis by multi-objective mixed integer programming model. J Environ Manag 48:17–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang NB, Wang SF (1997) A fuzzy goal programming approach for the optimal planning of metropolitan solid waste management systems. Eur J Oper Res 99:303–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng GH, Huang GH, Li YP, Cao MF, Fan YR (2009) Planning of municipal solid waste management systems under dual uncertainties: a hybrid interval stochastic programming approach. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:707–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi GF, Huang GH (1998) Long-term planning of integrated solid waste management system under uncertainty. University of Regina Report submitted to the City of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

  • Guo P, Huang GH (2009) Two-stage fuzzy chance-constrained programming: application to water resources management under dual uncertainties. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo P, Huang GH, He L (2008) ISMISIP: an inexact stochastic mixed integer linear semi-infinite programming approach for solid waste management and planning under uncertainty. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22:759–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH (1998) A hybrid inexact-stochastic water management model. Eur J Oper Res 107:137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1992) An interval linear programming approach for municipal solid waste management planning under uncertainty. Civ Eng Environ Syst 9:319–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1993) A grey fuzzy linear programming approach for municipal solid waste management planning under uncertainty. Civ Eng Environ Syst 10:123–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1994) Grey dynamic programming (GDP) for solid waste management planning under uncertainty. J Urban Plan Dev 120:132–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1995a) Grey integer programming: an application to waste management planning under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 83:594–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1995b) Grey fuzzy integer programming: an application to regional waste management planning under uncertainty. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 29:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Sae-Lim N, Liu L, Chen Z (2001) An interval-parameter fuzzy-stochastic programming approach for municipal solid waste management and planning. Environ Model Assess 6:271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang YF, Baetz BW, Huang GH, Liu L (2002) Violation analysis for solid waste management systems: an interval fuzzy programming approach. J Environ Manag 65:431–446

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirca J, Erkip N (1998) Selecting transfer station locations for large solid waste systems. Eur J Oper Res 38:339–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimbach M (1996) Development of a fuzzy optimization model, supporting global warming decision-making. Environ Res Econ 7:163–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YP, Huang GH, Chen X (2009) Multistage scenario-based interval-stochastic programming for planning water resources allocation. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:781–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZF, Huang GH, Liao RF, He L (2009) DIPIP: Dual Interval Probabilistic Integer Programming for Solid Waste Management. J Environ Info 14(1):66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu HW, Huang GH, He L (2009) An inexact programming method for agricultural irrigation systems under parameter uncertainty. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:759–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqsood I, Huang GH, Huang YF, Chen B (2005a) ITOM: an interval-parameter two-stage optimization model for stochastic planning of water resources systems. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 19:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqsood I, Huang GH, Yeomans JS (2005b) An interval-parameter fuzzy two-stage stochastic program for water resources management under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 167:208–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie XH, Huang GH, Li YP, Liu L (2007) IFRP: A hybrid interval-parameter fuzzy robust programming approach for waste management planning under uncertainty. J Environ Manag 84:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papoulis A, Unnikrishna Pillai S (2002) Probability random variables and stochastic processes. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH, Zeng GM, Chakma A, Huang YF (2007) An interval-parameter fuzzy nonlinear optimization model for stream water quality management under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 180:1331–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose C, Smith MD (1996) The multivariate normal distribution. Mathematica J 6:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan Q, Huang GH, Cai YP (2009) Identification of optimal plans for municipal solid waste management in an environment of fuzziness and two-layer randomness. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. doi:10.1007/s00477-009-0307-1

  • Tong L (1990) The multivariate normal distribution. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DC (1985) Long term planning for solid waste planning. Waste Manag Res 3:203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Huang GH, Qin XS, Cao MF (2009) SRCCP: a stochastic robust chance-constrained programming model for municipal solid waste management under uncertainty. Resour Conserv Recy 53(6):352–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Huang GH, Qin XS, Cao MF, Sun Y (2010) An interval-parameter robust optimization model for supporting municipal solid waste management under uncertainty. Waste Manag 30(2):316–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans JS (2008) Applications of Simulation-Optimization Methods in Environmental Policy Planning under Uncertainty. J Environ Info 12(2):174–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans JS, Huang GH (2003) An evolutionary grey, hop, skip, and jump approach: generating alternative policies for the expansion of waste management. J Environ Info 1:37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans JS, Huang GH, Yoogalingam R (2003) Combining simulation with evolutionary algorithms for optimal planning under uncertainty: an application to municipal solid waste management planning in the regional municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth. J Environ Info 2:11–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Y, Trauth KM (2005) Internet-based fuzzy multicriteria decision support system for planning integrated solid waste management. J Environ Info 6:1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Z, Revelle C (1993) A cost allocation method for facilities sitting with fixed-charge cost functions. Civ Eng Environ Syst 7:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Major State Basic Research Development Program (2005CB724200). The authors are grateful to the editor and the reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions in improving the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. H. Huang.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 The process of acquiring an RBI

The process of acquiring an RBI is provided as follows. Firstly, samples of the possible intervals for RBI can be acquired:

$$ \left( {u_{1} ,v_{1} } \right),\left( {u_{2} ,v_{2} } \right), \ldots ,\left( {u_{n} ,v_{n} } \right) $$

where (u i v i ) is the value of the ith sample. Secondly, calculate the mean vector and covariance matrix of the samples:

$$ \mu = \left( {\frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {u_{i} } ,\,\frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {v_{i} } } \right), \quad D = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\sigma_{1}^{2} } & {\rho \sigma_{1} \sigma 2} \\ {\rho \sigma_{1} \sigma 2} & {\sigma_{2}^{2} } \\ \end{array} } \right) $$
$$ \sigma_{1}^{2} = \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n} {\left( {u_{t} - \mu_{1} } \right)^{2} } , \quad \sigma_{2}^{2} = \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n} {\left( {v_{t} - \mu_{2} } \right)^{2} } ,\,\rho = {\frac{1}{{n\sigma_{1} \sigma_{2} }}}\sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n} {\left( {u_{t} - \mu_{1} } \right)} \left( {v_{t} - \mu_{2} } \right) $$

Thirdly, suppose that the inputs follow a distribution based on the mean vector and covariance matrix. A hypothesis testing can be undertaken. A joint distribution function can then be identified for (B i , B + i ) [i.e. = f(st)]. Suppose [cd] to be the range of B + i . Finally, the probability density function (PDF) of B i can be generated:

$$ f_{s} \left( s \right) = \int\limits_{c}^{d} {f\left( {s,t} \right)dt} $$

Suppose [a, b] is the range of B i . Similarly, we can get the PDF of B + i as follows:

$$ f_{t} \left( t \right) = \int\limits_{a}^{b} {f\left( {s,t} \right)ds} $$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cao, M.F., Huang, G.H., Sun, Y. et al. Dual inexact fuzzy chance-constrained programming for planning waste management systems. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24, 1163–1174 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0390-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0390-3

Keywords

Navigation