Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic appendectomy is now the treatment of choice in uncomplicated appendicitis. To date its importance in the treatment of complicated appendicitis is not clearly defined.

Methods

From January 2005 to June 2013 a total of 1762 patients underwent appendectomy for the suspected diagnosis of appendicitis at our institution. Of these patients 1516 suffered from complicated appendicitis and were enrolled. In total 926 (61 %) underwent open appendectomy (OA) and 590 (39 %) underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). The following parameters were retrospectively analyzed: age, sex, operative times, histology, length of hospital stay, 30-day morbidity focusing on occurrence of surgical site infections, intraabdominal abscess formation, postoperative ileus and appendiceal stump insufficiency, conversion rate, use of endoloops and endostapler.

Results

A statistically significant difference in operative time was observed between the laparoscopic and the open group (64.5 vs. 60 min; p = 0.002). Median length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.000). Surgical site infections occurred exclusively after OA (38 vs. 0 patients). Intraabdominal abscess formation occurred statistically significantly more often after LA (2 vs. 10 patients; p = 0.002). There were no statistical significances concerning the occurrence of postoperative ileus (p = 0.261) or appendiceal stump insufficiencies (p = 0.076).

Conclusions

The laparoscopic approach for complicated appendicitis is a safe and feasible procedure. Surgeons should be aware of a potentially higher incidence of intraabdominal abscess formation following LA. Use of endobags , inversion of the appendiceal stump and carefully conducted local irrigation of the abdomen in a supine position may reduce the incidence of abscess formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Semm K (1983) Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15:59–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer MD 3rd, Harrison JB (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219:725–728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M (2003) A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 17:1023–1028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peter JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 169:208–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Towfigh S, Chen F, Mason R, Katkhouda N, Chan L, Berne T (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 20:495–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239:43–52

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen NT, Zainabadi K, Mavandadi S, Paya M, Stevens CM, Root J, Wilson SE (2004) Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 188:813–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 186:545–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Panagiotopoulos S, Panagopoulos K, Kalfarentzos F (2008) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go? World J Gastroenterol 14:4909–4914

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL, Bassin A, Breslaw R, McKenney MG, Ginzburg E, Sleeman D (1995) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 222:256–261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonanni F, Reed J 3rd, Hartzell G, Trostle D, Boorse R, Gittleman M, Cole A (1994) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. J Am Coll Surg 179:273–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wullstein C, Barkhausen S, Gross E (2001) Results of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1700–1705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Pritts TA, Ko CY, Esposito TJ (2010) Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery 148:625–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD001546

  16. Yeh CC, Wu SC, Liao CC, Su LT, Hsieh CH, Li TC (2011) Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a nationwide population-based study. Surg Endosc 25:2932–2942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D (2011) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann Surg 254:927–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zdichavsky M, Gögele H, Blank G, Kraulich M, Meile T, von Feilitzsch M, Wichmann D, Königsrainer A (2013) Histological characterization of appendectomy specimens with intraoperative appearance of vascular injection. Surg Endosc 27:849–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Procedure-associated Module SSI: Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event: Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/9pscSSIcurrent.pdf

  20. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lim SGL, Ahn EJ, Kim SY, Chung IY, Park JM, Park SH, Choi KW (2011) A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 27:293–297

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Fukami Y, Hasegawa H, Sakamoto E, Komatsu S, Hiromatsu T (2007) Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 31:93–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Sugiyama K, Fukunaga M (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg 33:208–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin HF, Wu JM, Tseng LM, Chen KH, Huang SH, Lai IR (2006) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 10:906–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yau KK, Siu WT, Tang CN, Yang GP, Li MK (2007) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 205:60–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. So JB, Chiong EC, Chiong E, Cheah WK, Lomanto D, Goh P, Kum CK (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 26:1485–1488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tuggle KR, Ortega G, Bolorunduro OB, Oyetunji TA, Alexander R, Turner PL, Chang DC, Cornwell EE 3rd, Fullum TM (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in complicated appendicitis: a review of the NSQIP database. J Surg Res 163:225–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Khiria LS, Ardhnari R, Mohan N, Kumar P, Nambiar R (2011) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: is it safe and justified? A retrospective analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:142–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Garg CP, Vaidya BB, Chengalath MM (2009) Efficacy of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis. Int J Surg 7:250–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Piskun G, Kozik D, Rajpal S, Shaftan G, Fogler R (2001) Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 15:660–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    P. Horvath, J. Lange, R. Bachmann, F. Struller, A. Königsrainer & M. Zdichavsky

Authors
  1. P. Horvath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Lange
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Bachmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Struller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Königsrainer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Zdichavsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Horvath.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Philipp Horvath, Dr. Jessica Lange, Dr. Robert Bachmann, Dr. Florian Struller, Dr. Alfred Königsrainer and Dr. Marty Zdichavsky have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horvath, P., Lange, J., Bachmann, R. et al. Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 31, 199–205 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4957-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4957-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation