Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis: A Comparison with Open Appendectomy

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is widely performed in many countries, LA for complicated appendicitis, which includes perforated or gangrenous appendicitis with or without localized or disseminated peritonitis, has not become a common practice yet.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 230 patients who had undergone appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: 141 had undergone LA, 84 had conventional open appendectomy (OA), and 5 patients had conversion to the open procedure after laparoscopy. The LA group (total LA) was subdivided into “early experience (early LA: cases 1–56)” and “late experience (late LA: case 57 and higher).” We defined the early LA group as the comparison group to minimize selection bias.

Results

Patient demographics were similar in the early LA and OA groups (P > 0.05). Wound infection was significantly more frequent in the OA group (P < 0.05). Intra-abdominal infection was equally common in these two groups. The overall rate of postoperative complications was significantly higher in the OA group (32.1%) than in the early LA group (18%; P < 0.05). This incidence was 12.8% in the total LA group. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the early LA group (10.6 ± 3.9 days; P < 0.05), and 8.9 ± 3.7 days in the total LA group.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that LA is safe and useful even for the treatment of complicated appendicitis if performed by an experienced surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Semm K (1983) Endoscopicappendectomy. Endoscopy 15:59–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Heinzelmann M, Simmen HP, Cummins AS et al (1995) Is laparoscopic appendectomy the new “gold standard?” Arch Surg 130:782–785

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EAM (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 4:CD001546 pub 2 The Cochrane Collaboration. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P et al (1999) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177:250–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD et al (1999) Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9:17–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg 186:543–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sauerland S, Lafering R, Holthausen U et al (1998) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383:289–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42:377–383

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Slim K, Pezet D, Chipponi J (1998) Laparoscopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 41:398–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJG (1998) Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of patient and with appendectomy rate. Eur J Surg 158:37–41

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST, Denholm S et al (1988) Preventing wound infection after appendicectomy: a review. Br J Surg 75:1023–1032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ et al (1997) Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1:188–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Frazee RC, Bohannon WT (1996) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg 131:509–512

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Katkhouda N, Friedlander MH, Grant SW et al (2000) Intra-abdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 180:456–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Horwitz JR, Custer MD, May BH et al (1997) Should laparoscopic appendectomy be avoided for complicated appendicitis in children? J Pediatr Surg 32:1601–1603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krisher SL, Browne A, Dibbins A et al (2001) Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg 136:438–441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Canty TG, Collins D, Losasso B et al (2000) Laparoscopic appendectomy for simple and perforated appendicitis in children: the procedure of choice? J Pediatr Surg 35:1582–1585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K et al (2002) Laparoscopy in children with complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 37:1317–1320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cueto J, D’Allemagne B, Vazquez-Frias JA et al (2006) Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: an international study. Surg Endosc 20:717–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wullstein C, Barkhausen S, Gross E (2001) Results of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1700–1705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Towfigh S, Chen F, Mason R et al (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 20:495–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ball CG, Kortbeck JB, Kirkpatrick AW et al (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 18:969–973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zerem E, Salkic N, Imamovic G et al (2007) Comparison of therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage with antibiotics versus antibiotics alone in the treatment of periappendiceal abscess: is appendectomy always necessary after perforation of appendix? Surg Endosc 21:461–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brandt D, Gervaz P, Durmishi Y et al (2006) Percutaneous CT scan-guided drainage vs antibiotherapy alone for Hinchey II diverticulitis: a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1533–1538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E (1999) Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 86:48–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu S, Siewert B, Raptopoulos V et al (2001) Factors associated with conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. J Am Coll Surg 194:298–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH et al (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schäfer M, Krähenbühl L, Frei E et al (2000) Laparoscopic appendectomy in Switzerland: a prospective audit of 2,179 cases. Dig Surg 17:497–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kazemier G, in’t Hof KH, Saad S et al (2006) Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc 20:1473–1476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lörken M, Marnitz U, Schumpelick V (1999) Freier intraperitonealer Clip als Ursache eines mechanischen Dünndarmileus. Chirurg 70:1492–1493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nottingham JM (2002) Mechanical small bowel obstruction from a loose linear cutter staple after laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:289–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Petrocelli P, Corsale I, Giannessi S et al (2003) Complicanze da suture meccaniche in chirurgia laparoscopica: occlusione intestinale da clip: segnalazione di un caso clinico e revisione della letteratura. Minerva Chir 58:591–594

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Juntendo Urayasu Hospital, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, 279-0021, Japan

    Goutaro Katsuno, Kunihiko Nagakari, Seiichiro Yoshikawa, Kazuyoshi Sugiyama & Masaki Fukunaga

Authors
  1. Goutaro Katsuno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kunihiko Nagakari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seiichiro Yoshikawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kazuyoshi Sugiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Masaki Fukunaga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Goutaro Katsuno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katsuno, G., Nagakari, K., Yoshikawa, S. et al. Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis: A Comparison with Open Appendectomy. World J Surg 33, 208–214 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9843-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9843-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation