Abstract
Tomographic particle image velocimetry (PIV) is a recently developed method to measure three components of velocity within a volumetric space. We present a visual hull technique that automates identification and masking of discrete objects within the measurement volume, and we apply existing tomographic PIV reconstruction software to measure the velocity surrounding the objects. The technique is demonstrated by considering flow around falling bodies of different shape with Reynolds number ~1,000. Acquired image sets are processed using separate routines to reconstruct both the volumetric mask around the object and the surrounding tracer particles. After particle reconstruction, the reconstructed object mask is used to remove any ghost particles that otherwise appear within the object volume. Velocity vectors corresponding with fluid motion can then be determined up to the boundary of the visual hull without being contaminated or affected by the neighboring object velocity. Although the visual hull method is not meant for precise tracking of objects, the reconstructed object volumes nevertheless can be used to estimate the object location and orientation at each time step.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrian RJ, Westerweel J (2011) Particle image velocimetry. Cambridge University Press, New York
Atkinson C, Soria J (2009) An efficient simultaneous reconstruction technique for tomographic particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 47:553–568
Atkinson CH, Dillon-Gibbons CJ, Herpin H, Soria J (2008) Reconstruction techniques for tomographic PIV (Tomo-PIV) of a turbulent boundary layer. In: 14th International symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics. Lisbon, Portugal
Balachandar S, Eaton JK (2010) Turbulent dispersed multiphase flow. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 40:111–133
Bandyopadhyay PR (2005) Trends in biorobotic autonomous undersea vehicles. IEEE J Ocean Eng 30:109–139
Belden J, Techet AH (2011) Simultaneous quantitative flow measurement using PIV on both sides of the air-water interface for breaking waves. Exp Fluids 50:149–161
Discetti S, Astarita T (2011) A fast multi-resolution approach to tomographic PIV. Exp Fluids. doi:10.1007/s00348-011-1119-x
Elsinga GE (2007) Tomographic particle image velocimetry and its application to turbulence boundary layers. Delft University of Technology, Dissertation
Elsinga GE, Westerweel J (2011) Tomographic-PIV measurement of the flow around a zigzag boundary layer trip. Exp Fluids. doi:10.1007/s00348-011-1153-8
Elsinga GE, Scarano F, Wieneke B, van Oudheusden BW (2006) Tomographic particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 41:933–947
Flammang BE, Lauder GV, Troolin DR, Strand TE (2011) Volumetric imaging of fish locomotion. Biol Lett. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0282
Foeth EJ, van Doorne CWH, van Terwisga T, Wieneke B (2006) Time resolved PIV and flow visualization of 3D sheet cavitation. Exp Fluids 40:503–513
Gao Q, Ortiz-Duenas C, Longmire EK (2010) Eddy structure in turbulent boundary layers based on tomographic PIV. In: 15th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics. Lisbon, Portugal
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2002) Digital image processing. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
Hain R, Kahler CJ, Michaelis D (2008) Tomographic and time resolved PIV measurements in on a finite cylinder mounted on a flat plate. Exp Fluids 45(4):715–724
Herman GT, Lent A (1976) Iterative reconstruction algorithms. Comput Biol Med 6:273–294
Hinsch KD (2002) Holographic particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 13:61–72
Hori T, Sakakibara J (2004) High speed scanning stereoscopic PIV for 3D vorticity measurement in liquids. Meas Sci Technol 15:1067–1078
Hounsfield GN (1973) Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): part 1. Description of system. Br Inst Radiol 46:1016–1022
Jeon YJ, Sung HJ (2010) PIV measurement of flow around an arbitrarily moving body. Exp Fluids 50:787–798
Jeon YJ, Sung HJ (2011) Simultaneous PIV measurement of flow around a moving body. In: 9th international symposium on particle image velocimetry. Kobe, Japan
Khalitov DA, Longmire EK (2002) Simultaneous two-phase PIV by two-parameter phase discrimination. Exp Fluids 32:252–268
Khun M, Ehrenfried K, Bosbach J, Wagner C (2010) Large-scale tomographic particle image velocimetry using helium-filled soap bubbles. Exp Fluids 50:929–948
Kiger KT, Pan C (2000) PIV technique for the simultaneous measurement of dilute two-phase flows. J Fluids Eng 122:811–818
Kim H, Groβe S, Elsinga GE, Westerweel J (2011) Full 3D-3C velocity measurement inside a liquid immersion droplet. Exp Fluids. doi:10.1007/s00348-011-1053-y
Laurentini A (1994) The visual hull concept for silhouette-based image understanding. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 16:150–162
Laurentini A (1997) How many 2D silhouettes does it take to reconstruct a 3D Object? Comput Vision Image Underst 67:81–87
Lua KB, Lai KC, Lim TT, Yeo KS (2010) On the aerodynamic characteristics of hovering rigid and flexible hawkmoth-like wings. Exp Fluids 49:1263–1291
Maas HG, Gruen A, Papantoniou D (1993) Particle tracking velocimetry in three-dimensional flows. Part 1. Photogrammetric determination of particle coordinates. Exp Fluids 15:133–146
Matusik W, Buehler C, Raskar R, Gortler SJ, McMillan L (2000) Image-based visual hulls. In: SIGGRAPH ‘00 proceedings of the 27th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. New Orleans, Louisiana USA
Mulayim AY, Yilmaz U, Atalay V (2003) Silhouette-based 3-D model reconstruction from multiple images. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 33:582–591
Murphy DW, Webster DR, Yen J (2011) A high-speed tomographic PIV investigation of plankton-turbulence interaction. In: 9th international symposium on particle image velocimetry. Kobe, Japan
Novara M, Batenburg KJ, Scarano F (2010) Motion tracking-enhanced MART for tomographic PIV. Meas Sci Technol 21:035401
Ortiz-Duenas C, Kim J, Longmire EK (2010) Investigation of liquid–liquid drop coalescence using tomographic PIV. Exp Fluids 49:111–129
Rand R, Pratap R, Ramani D, Cipolla J, Kirschner I (1997) Impact dynamics of a supercavitating underwater projectile DETC. ASME Des Eng Tech Conf
Reiser MB, Dickinson MH (2003) A test bed for insect-inspired robotic control. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 361:2267–2285
Ruiz LA, Whittlesey RW, Dabiri JO (2011) Vortex-enhanced propulsion. J Fluid Mech 668:5–32
Sakakibara J, Nakagawa M, Yoshida M (2004) Stereo-PIV study of flow around a maneuvering fish. Exp Fluids 36:282–293
Scarano F, Poelma C (2009) Three-dimension vorticity patterns of cylinder wakes. Exp Fluids 47:69–83
Vanek B, Bokor J, Balas GJ, Arndt REA (2007) Longitudinal motion control of a high-speed supercavitation vehicle. J Vib Control 13:159–184
Verhoeven D (1993) Limited-data computed tomography algorithms for physical sciences. Appl Opt 32:3736–3754
Waggett RJ, Buskey EJ (2006) Copepod sensitivity to flow fields: detection by copepods of predatory ctenopores. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 323:205–211
Waggett RJ, Buskey EJ (2007) Copepod escape behavior in non-turbulent and turbulent hydrodynamic regimes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 334:193–198
Webster DR, Weissburg MJ (2009) The hydrodynamics of chemical cues among aquatic organisms. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 41:73–90
Wieneke B (2008) Volume self-calibration for 3D particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 45:549–556
Willert CE, Gharib M (1992) Three-dimensional particle imaging with a single camera. Exp Fluids 12:353–358
Worth NA, Nickels TB (2008) Acceleration of Tomo-PIV by estimating the initial volume intensity distribution. Exp Fluids 45:847–856
Yu J, Hu Y, Huo J, Wang L (2009) Dolphin-like propulsive mechanism based on an adjustable scotch yoke. Mech Mach Theory 44:603–614
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation through Grant IDBR-0852875. D. Adhikari was partially supported by a University of Minnesota Graduate Fellowship while undertaking this research. The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their invaluable suggestions and comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary material 1 (MPEG 12022 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (MPEG 23756 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (MPEG 14944 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (MPEG 12152 kb)
Appendix: Formulae derivations for obscured regions of a simple object shape and standard four-camera configuration
Appendix: Formulae derivations for obscured regions of a simple object shape and standard four-camera configuration
Consider the camera arrangement and object orientation as shown in Fig. 17. We assume the lines of sight are parallel for each camera, and the object is a cuboid. The inclination angles of Cameras 1–4 are α1, α2, α3, and α4 respectively. The dimensions of the cuboid are a (length) × b (width) × c (depth), where a and b are parallel to the laser sheet, and the side faces of the object are aligned with the camera angles. The distance from the rear of the object (relative to the cameras) to the rear edge of the laser sheet is given by t.
The fully obscured region (green in Fig. 17) is not optically accessible by any camera. For the given object orientation, this region can be either trapezoidal or pyramidal in shape, depending on the laser sheet thickness, object location, and object dimension. Mathematically, the following relations must be satisfied for a trapezoidal-shaped fully obscured region:
Otherwise, the fully obscured region is pyramidal.
The partially obscured region (blue in Fig. 17), which is accessible by less than 3 cameras, can be calculated by subtracting the fully obscured volume from the object “shadow” (i.e. a × b × t).
1.1 Trapezoidal fully obscured region
First, we consider the trapezoidal fully obscured volume (Fig. 18) which can be split into a cuboid (blue), 4 half—cuboids (red) and 4 pyramids (green). We can obtain the total volume by summing the 9 parts (Fig. 19).
(1) Cuboid
(2) Total Volume of 4 Half Cuboids
(3) Total Volume of 4 Pyramids
The partially obscured region is given by:
To simplify Eqs. (13) and (14) further, we consider a symmetric camera arrangement (i.e., α1 = α2 = α3 = α4 = α) and a cubic object (i.e. a = b = c).
where the assumptions for trapezoidal-shape (see Eqs. 6 and 7) both reduce to
1.2 Pyramidal fully obscured region (simplified with α1 = α2 = α3 = α4 = α and a = b = c)
If \( \tan (\alpha ) \ge \frac{a}{2t} \), the fully obscured volume will converge to a pyramidal shape (see green in Fig. 20)
The volume of the green pyramid (fully obscured region) is given by:
where the height h is found easily by trigonometry.
The partially obscured region is now given by:
where the last term is the white optically accessible region in Fig. 20. Note, however, that this equation, when simplified, reduces to the same form as Eq. (16).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adhikari, D., Longmire, E.K. Visual hull method for tomographic PIV measurement of flow around moving objects. Exp Fluids 53, 943–964 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1338-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1338-9