Abstract
Background
We have not found studies that have measured the peritoneal surface area of each of the walls, organs, mesos, omenta, and peritoneal ligaments in a group of non-eviscerated human cadavers.
Objectives
The objectives of this study were to obtain in fixed non-eviscerated cadavers: (1) the surface values of walls, organs, mesos, omenta, and peritoneal ligaments of each one and all the areas mentioned in the anatomy bibliography and their contribution to supra- and infra-colic portions, visceral and parietal portions of the supra- and infra-colic portions and the total peritoneal surface area, and (2) the relationship between the peritoneal surface values by direct measurement and the values obtained applying the formulas usually used in clinical practice to obtain body surface area.
Methods
The peritoneal surface area of ten female human bodies presenting no abdominal pathologies were measured. They were fixed in 5% formaldehyde solution without the use of perfusion pumps and non-eviscerated, thus maintaining all structures intact. Cellophane was placed directly in situ onto all organs, mesos, omenta, ligaments and parietal walls. Digital imaging was obtained by scanning the models. A length reference was included and the surface was determined by the Scion Image program for Windows.
Results
This paper provides for the first time data on each one and all the areas covered by the peritoneum. The total peritoneal surface area was (mean ± SE) 14,323.62 ± 824.37 cm2. The two greater surfaces of peritoneum (39.21% of the total surface) correspond to the jejunum–ileum and its mesentery. The diaphragmatic peritoneum represented the greater area of parietal peritoneum. The supracolic surface was 4,487.46 ± 196.21 cm2 (31.79 ± 1.50%) and the infracolic one of 9,836.16 ± 732.67 cm2 (68.21 ± 1.50%). An interesting result of this work is that the surface of the parietal peritoneum in the supracolic abdomen (1,786.67 ± 92.58 cm2, 68.56%) is more than twice that of the infracolic region (756.62 ± 55.91 cm2, 31.44%). The visceral peritoneal surface (81.89 ± 0.99% of the total) was much higher than that of the parietal peritoneum (18.11 ± 0.99%). This difference is 12 times bigger in the infracolic abdomen. The peritoneal surface area measured in this study in non-eviscerated cadavers represents more than 96% of the one estimated by the above-mentioned formulas.
Conclusion
The values shown in this paper would provide non-existing information for basic anatomy, and would contribute either to the study of pathologies involving the peritoneum or to their diagnosis and therapies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyd E (1935) The growth of the surface area of the human body. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. In: Current JD (1998) A linear equation for estimating the body surface area in infants and children. The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology, vol 2 no 2
Breborowicz A, Rodela H, Knapowski J, Oreopoulos DG (1989) Permeability of different parts of the peritoneal mesothelium to solutes: an in vitro study. Perit Dial Int 9(2):135–141
Caimi F, Rovere G, Philippson M, Battaglia E (1991) Contribution of peritoneography combined with computerized tomography, in the assessment of abdominal complications in patients undergoing continuous peritoneal dialysis. Radiol Med (Torino) 81(5):656–659
Carmignani CP, Sugarbaker TA, Bromley CM, Sugarbaker PH (2003) Intraperitoneal cancer dissemination: mechanisms of the patterns of spread. Cancer Metastasis Rev 22(4):465–472
Chagnac A, Herskovitz P, Weinstein T, Elyashiv S, Hirsh J, Hammel I, Gafter U (1999) The peritoneal membrane in peritoneal dialysis patients estimation of its functional surface area by applying stereologic methods to computerized tomography scans. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:342–346
DuBois D, DuBois EF (1916) A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Int Med 17:863–871
Elsayes KM, Staveteig PT, Narra VR, Leyendecker JR, Lewis JS Jr, Brown JJ (2006) MRI of the peritoneum: spectrum of abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(5):1368–1379
Esperanca MJ, Collins DL (1966) Peritoneal dialysis efficiency in relation to body weight. J Pediatr Surg 1(2):162–169
Fischbach M, Michallat AC, Zollner G, Dheu C, Barthelmebs M, Helwig JJ, Loichot C, Escande B, Schmitt KP, Schaefer F, Haraldsson B, Jacques C (2005) Measurement by magnetic resonance imaging of the peritoneal membrane in contact with dialysate in rats. Adv Perit Dial 21:17–20
Flessner MF, Lofthouse J, Williams A (2001) Increasing peritoneal contact area during dialysis improves mass transfer. J Am Soc Nephrol 12(10):2139–2145
Garofalo A, Valle M, Garcia J, Sugarbaker PH (2006) Laparoscopic intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for palliation of debilitating malignant ascites. Eur J Surg Oncol 32(6):682–685
Gehan EA, George SL (1970) Estimation of human body surface area from height and weight. Cancer Chemother Rep 54:225–235
Gotloib L, Gotloib LC, Khrizman V (2007) The use of peritoneal mesothelium as a potential source of adult stem cells. Int J Artif Organs 30(6):501–512
Williams PL (1995) Gray’s anatomy. The anatomical basis of medicine and surgery, 38th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 1734–1746
Haycock GB, Schwartz GJ, Wisotsky DH (1978) Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height weight formula validated in infants, children and adults. J Pediatr 93(1):62–66
Kaneko K, Hamada C, Tomino Y (2007) Peritoneal fibrosis intervention. Perit Dial Int 27(Suppl 2):S82–S86
Kruschewski M, Al-Fakhri N, Runkel N, Buhr HJ (2000) The insertion of the lesser and greater gastric omenta and its significance for the T classification of gastric carcinomas (UICC). Surg Radiol Anat 22(3–4):135–138
Lamme B, Mahler CW, van Ruler O, Gouma DJ, Reitsma JB, Boermeester MA (2006) Clinical predictors of ongoing infection in secondary peritonitis: systematic review. World J Surg 30(12):2170–2181
Lardennois G, Okinczyc J (1913) La typhlosigmoidostömie en Y dans le traitment des coutes rebelles et de la stase du gros intestin. Bull Mem Soc Anat Paris 39:858–872
Mosteller RD (1987) Simplified calculation of body surface area. N Engl J Med 317(17):1098
Ombredanne L. (1900) Les lames vasculaires dans l’abdomen, le bassin et le perinée. Th. Paris
Pawlaczyk K, Kuzlan M, Wieczorowska-Tobis K, Pawlik-Juzków H, Breborowicz A, Knapowski J, Oreopoulos DG (1996) Species-dependent topography of the peritoneum. Adv Perit Dial 12:3–6
Poirier P, Charpy A (1905) Traité d’Anatomie Humaine Tomo 4 - fascicule3- (por Pierre Frédet). Deuxiéme Edition. Masson et Cie Editeurs, Paris, pp 885–1122
Prischl FC, Muhr T, Seiringer EM, Funk S, Kronabethleitner G, Wallner M, Artmann W, Kramar R (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging of the peritoneal cavity among peritoneal dialysis patients, using the dialysate as “contrast medium”. J Am Soc Nephrol 13(1):197–203
Rubin J, Clawson M, Planch A (1988) Measurements of peritoneal surface area in man and rat. Am J Med Sci 295(5):453–458
Testut L, Latarjet A (1975) Anatomía Humana. Tomo IV. Salvat Editores. SA. 9ª edn. Barcelona, Spain, pp 741–839
Twardowski ZJ (2006) Pathophysiology of peritoneal transport. Contrib Nephrol 150:13–19
Yan TD, Padang R, Morris DL (2006) Longterm results and prognostic indicators after cryotherapy and hepatic arterial chemotherapy with or without resection for colorectal liver metastases in 224 patients: longterm survival can be achieved in patients with multiple bilateral liver metastases. J Am Coll Surg 202(1):100–111
Yavuz K, Erden A, Ates K, Erden I (2005) MR peritoneography in complications of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Abdom Imaging 30(3):361–368
Zakaria ER, Carlsson O, Rippe B (1997) Limitation of small-solute exchange across the visceral peritoneum: effects of vibration. Perit Dial Int 17:72–79
Acknowledgments
The authors hereby record their gratitude to Ms. Alicia López López for her assistance with the translation of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Albanese, A.M., Albanese, E.F., Miño, J.H. et al. Peritoneal surface area: measurements of 40 structures covered by peritoneum: correlation between total peritoneal surface area and the surface calculated by formulas. Surg Radiol Anat 31, 369–377 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0456-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0456-9