Abstract
Background
The multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome (MEN1) natural history is poorly evaluated, and few single-institution experiences about hereditary gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) are reported. Our purpose is to analyze the role of GEP-NET in MEN1-related death, as well as the behavior of these lesions during follow-up.
Methods
The study population consists of 77 patients diagnosed with MEN1 GEP-NET, regularly followed up since 1990. Extensive clinical data were prospectively recorded. Statistical analysis was performed both on the whole population of 77 patients and on two subgroups including patients who, during the long lasting study period, underwent GEP-NET surgery (50 pts) and who did not (27 pts), respectively.
Results
Twenty-five males (32.5%) and 52 females (67.5%) were enrolled. Sixty-four patients had MEN1 family history (83.1%), and genetic mutation was detected in 67 cases (87%). The mean age at GEP-NET diagnosis was 41.4 years (SD = 13.6); 16 patients (20.8%) had GEP-NET diagnosed before age 30 and 12 cases (15.6%) before 1996. The mean interval time between MEN1 diagnosis and GEP-NET detection was 5.7 years (range −11/37; SD = 8.1 years). Overall, the mean follow-up time from MEN1 diagnosis was 15.8 years (SD = 9.7 years) and from GEP-NET diagnosis was 9.6 years (SD = 6.9 years). Gastrinoma was the most frequent functioning GEP-NET and pancreatoduodenectomy the most adopted surgery. GEP-NET progression affected 12 patients within the non-surgical group, while 18 subjects developed progression after surgery.
Conclusions
Our single-center data provide information on epidemiologic, clinical and pathological features of GEP-NET in MEN1 making possible to clarify their natural history.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Larsson C, Skogseid B, Oberg K et al (1988) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gene maps to chromosome 11 and is lost in insulinoma. Nature 332:85–87
Chandrasekharappa SC, Guru SC, Manickam P et al (1997) Positional cloning of the gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Science 276:404–407
Brandi ML, Gagel RF, Angeli A et al (2001) Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type 2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5658–5671
Fendrich V, Langer P, Waldmann J et al (2007) Management of sporadic and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gastrinomas. Br J Surg 94:1331–1341
Waldmann J, Fendrich V, Habbe N et al (2009) Screening of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1(MEN-1): a critical analysis of its value. World J Surg 33:1208–1218. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-9983-8
Marx S, Spiegel AM, Skarulis MC et al (1998) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: clinical and genetic topics. Ann Intern Med 129:484–494
Calender A, Cadiot G, Mignon M (2001) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: genetic and clinical aspects. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 25:38–48
Chanson P, Cadiot G, Murat A (1997) Management of patients and subjects at risk for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: MEN 1. GENEM 1. Groupe d’Etude des Néoplasies Endocriniennes Multiples de type 1. Horm Res 47:211–220
Lemmens I, Van de Ven WJ, Kas KZ (1997) Identification of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) gene. The European consortium on MEN1. Hum Mol Genet 6:1177–1183
Ito T, Igarashi H, Uehara H et al (2013) Causes of death and prognostic factors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a prospective study: comparison of 106 MEN1/Zollinger–Ellison syndrome patients with 1613 literature MEN1 patients with or without pancreatic endocrine tumors. Med (Baltimore) 92:135–181
Doherty GM (2003) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: duodenopancreatic tumors. Surg Oncol 12:135–143
Doherty GM, Lairmore TC, DeBenedetti MK (2004) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 parathyroid adenoma development over time. World J Surg 28:1139–1142. doi:10.1007/s00268-004-7560-8
Hausman MS Jr, Thompson NW, Gauger PG et al (2004) The surgical management of MEN-1 pancreatoduodenal neuroendocrine disease. Surgery 136:1205–1211
Imamura M (2010) Recent standardization of treatment strategy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastroenterol 16:4519–4525
Virgolini I, Ambrosini V, Bomanji JB et al (2010) Procedure guidelines for PET/CT tumour imaging with 68 Ga-DOTA-conjugated peptides: 68 Ga-DOTA-TOC, 68 Ga-DOTA-NOC, 68 Ga-DOTA-TATE. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:2004–2010
Wild D, Schmitt JS, Ginj M et al (2003) DOTA-NOC, a high-affinity ligand of somatostatin receptor subtypes 2, 3 and 5 for labelling with various radiometals. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:1338–1347
Tiling N, Ricke J, Wiedenmann B (2002) Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal-pancreatic system. Classification and diagnosis. Internist (Berl) 43:210–218
Plöckinger U, Wiedenmann B (2002) Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic system: the role of early diagnosis, genetic testing and preventive surgery. Dig Dis 20:49–60
Lewis RB, Lattin GE Jr, Maj Paal E (2010) Pancreatic endocrine tumors: radiologic-clinicopathologic correlation. Radiographics 30:1445–1464
Pitre J, Soubrane O, Dousset B (1998) Pancreatic echo-endoscopy and preoperative localization of insulinomas. Ann Chir 52:369–373
Roland CL, Lo CY, Miller BS (2008) Surgical approach and perioperative complications determine short-term outcomes in patients with insulinoma: results of a bi-institutional study. Ann Surg Oncol 15:3532–3537
Pitre J, Soubrane O, Palazzo L (1996) Endoscopic ultrasonography for the preoperative localization of insulinomas. Pancreas 13:55–60
McLean A (2004) Endoscopic ultrasound in the detection of pancreatic islet cell tumours. Cancer Imaging 29:84–91
Sotoudehmanesh R, Hedayat A, Shirazian N (2007) Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the localization of insulinoma. Endocrine 31:238–241
Wilkinson S, Teh BT, Davey KR et al (1993) Cause of death in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Arch Surg 128:683–690
Doherty GM, Olson JA, Frisella MM et al (1998) Lethality of multiple endocrine neoplasia type I. World J Surg 22:581–587. doi:10.1007/s002689900438
Dean PG, van Heerden JA, Farley DR et al (2000) Are patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I prone to premature death? World J Surg 24:1437–1441. doi:10.1007/s002680010237
Goudet P, Murat A, Binquet C et al (2010) Risk factors and causes of death in MEN1 disease. A GTE (Groupe d’Etude des Tumeurs Endocrines) cohort study among 758 patients. World J Surg 34:249–255. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0290-1
Marini F, Falchetti A, Del Monte F et al (2006) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Orphanet J Rare Dis 1:38
Thakker RV (2010) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 24:355–370
Lévy-Bohbot N, Merle C, Goudet P et al (2004) Prevalence, characteristics and prognosis of MEN 1-associated glucagonomas, VIPomas, and somatostatinomas: study from the GTE (Groupe des Tumeurs Endocrines) registry. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 28:1075–1081
Lips CJ, Vasen HF, Lamers CB (1984) Multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2:117–184
Ekeblad S, Skogseid B, Dunder K et al (2008) Prognostic factors and survival in 324 patients with pancreatic endocrine tumor treated at a single institution. Clin Cancer Res 14:7798–7803
Cougard P, Goudet P, Peix JL et al (2000) Insulinomas in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Report of a series of 44 cases by the multiple endocrine neoplasia study group. Ann Chir 125:118–123
Skogseid B, Rastad J, Gobl A et al (1995) Adrenal lesion in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Surgery 118:1077–1082
Langer P, Cupisti K, Bartsch DK et al (2002) Adrenal involvement in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. World J Surg 26:891–896. doi:10.1007/s00268-002-6492-4
Acknowledgements
The authors have nothing to declare.
Author’s contribution
FG, TC and FG collected the data; GG, TC and FG analyzed the data; FG, TC, GB and FT wrote the manuscript; FT and MLB supervised the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors certify that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article, and they state that there are no financial interests nor connections, direct or indirect, or other situations that might raise the question of bias in the work reported or the conclusions, implications, or opinions stated—including pertinent commercial or other sources of funding for the individual author(s) or for the associated department(s) or organization(s), personal relationships, or direct academic competition. The authors certify also that the manuscript, including related data and figures, has not been previously published and that it is not under consideration elsewhere.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giudici, F., Cavalli, T., Giusti, F. et al. Natural History of MEN1 GEP-NET: Single-Center Experience After a Long Follow-Up. World J Surg 41, 2312–2323 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4019-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4019-2