Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged fifty years: comparison of hamstring graft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone graft

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency contributes to symptomatic functional instability of the knee, regardless of age. We evaluated patient-reported clinical outcome, instrumental stability and prevalence of radiological osteoarthritis based on two homogenous patient samples aged 50 years, an average of three years after isolated ACL reconstruction.

Methods

ACL reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft was done in 19 patients and a four-stranded semitendinosus tendon (ST) autograft in 22 patients. Clinical and functional follow-up assessment was performed an average of 32 months after surgical treatment. Clinical and functional follow-up assessment included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner score and Lysholm score. Instrumental stability testing was carried out using the KT–1000™ arthrometer. The degree of degenerative changes and prevalence of osteoarthritis was based on the Kellgren–Lawrence classification.

Results

Mean follow-up was 32 months (range, 28–36). Mean age was 49.4 years in both groups. The median pre-injury Tegner score was 5.5 (range, 2–8) and the median preoperative Lysholm score was 35 (range, 15–69). At two years, all variables improved significantly for both groups compared to the preoperative values (P < 0.05), with no significant intergroup differences. Approximately 76 % of patients were graded A or B according to the IKDC score in both groups. Activity level according to the scores of Tegner and Lysholm was 4.9/5.3 and 83.4/82.5 on two-year-follow up in both groups. Radiological assessment reported degenerative changes of grade I Osteoarthritis (OA) in 36 % of patients. Grade-II OA was found in 31 % of patients. Grade-III OA and grade-IV OA were found in about 24 % and 7 % of all patients, respectively. Correlation analyses showed significant relationships between conservation of knee-joint stability and clinical outcome according to the IKDC score, and activity level according to the Lysholm score (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using either BPTB graft or hamstring graft in appropriately selected middle-aged patients results in patient satisfaction and good clinical results, with return to a reasonable level of activity regardless of surgical method and graft choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laxdal G, Kartus J, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Magnusson L, Faxen E, Karlsson J (2005) Outcome and risk factors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a follow-up study of 948 patients. Arthroscopy 21(8):958–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murray MM (2009) Current status and potential of primary ACL repair. Clin Sports Med 28(1):51–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van Eck CF, Schreiber VM, Mejia HA, Samuelsson K, van Dijk CN, Karlsson J, Fu FH (2010) “Anatomic” anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of surgical techniques and reporting of surgical data. Arthroscopy 26(9 Suppl):2–12

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaudhari AM, Briant PL, Bevill SL, Koo S, Andriacchi TP (2008) Knee kinematics, cartilage morphology, and osteoarthritis after ACL injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40(2):215–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oiestad BE, Engebretsen L, Storheim K, Risberg MA (2009) Knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 37(7):1434–1443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Biau DJ, Katsahian S, Kartus J, Harilainen A, Feller JA, Sajovic M, Ejerhed L, Zaffagnini S, Ropke M, Nizard R (2009) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med 37(12):2470–2478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fithian DC, Paxton LW, Goltz DH (2002) Fate of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. Orthop Clin North Am 33(4):621–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keays SL, Newcombe PA, Bullock-Saxton JE, Bullock MI, Keays AC (2010) Factors involved in the development of osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports Med 38(3):455–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arbuthnot JE, Brink RB (2010) The role of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the older patients, 55 years or above. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(1):73–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barber FA, Aziz-Jacobo J, Oro FB (2010) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon allograft: an age-dependent outcome evaluation. Arthroscopy 26(4):488–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barrett G, Stokes D, White M (2005) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than 40 years: allograft versus autograft patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med 33(10):1505–1512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ciccotti MG, Lombardo SJ, Nonweiler B, Pink M (1994) Non-operative treatment of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament in middle-aged patients. Results after long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(9):1315–1321

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Herrington L, Fowler E (2006) A systematic literature review to investigate if we identify those patients who can cope with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Knee 13(4):260–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mihelic R, Jurdana H, Jotanovic Z, Madjarevic T, Tudor A (2011) Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison with non-operative treatment with a follow-up of 17–20 years. Int Orthop 35(7):1093–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fitzgerald GK, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2000) A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(2):76–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Legnani C, Terzaghi C, Borgo E, Ventura A (2011) Management of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in patients aged 40 years and older. J Orthop Traumatol 12(4):177–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Strehl A, Eggli S (2007) The value of conservative treatment in ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). J Trauma 62(5):1159–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jokl P, Kaplan N, Stovell P, Keggi K (1984) Non-operative treatment of severe injuries to the medial and anterior cruciate ligaments of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(5):741–744

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shelbourne KD, Wilckens JH (1993) Intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the symptomatic arthritic knee. Am J Sports Med 21(5):685–688, discussion 688–689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Barber FA, Elrod BF, McGuire DA, Paulos LE (1996) Is an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcome age dependent? Arthroscopy 12(6):720–725

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Javernick MA, Potter BK, Mack A, Dekay KB, Murphy KP (2006) Autologous hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than 40. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 35(9):430–434

    Google Scholar 

  22. Osti L, Papalia R, Del Buono A, Leonardi F, Denaro V, Maffulli N (2011) Surgery for ACL deficiency in patients over 50. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(3):412–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10(3):150–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Marquass B, Hepp P, Engel T, Dusing T, Lill H, Josten C (2007) The use of hamstrings in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 40 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(9):835–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Andersson D, Samuelsson K, Karlsson J (2009) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to surgical technique and rehabilitation: an assessment of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 25(6):653–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yasuda K, Tomiyama Y, Ohkoshi Y, Kaneda K (1989) Arthroscopic observations of autogeneic quadriceps and patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 246(246):217–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dahm DL, Wulf CA, Dajani KA, Dobbs RE, Levy BA, Stuart MA (2008) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in patients over 50 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(11):1446–1450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Struewer J, Frangen TM, Ishaque B, Bliemel C, Efe T, Ruchholtz S, Ziring E (2012) Knee function and prevalence of osteoarthritis after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: long-term follow-up. Int Orthop 36(1):171–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kellgren J, Lawrence J, Bier F (1963) Genetic factors in generalized Osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis Jul 22:237–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Outerbridge RE (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43-B:752–757

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Anderson AF, Irrgang JJ, Kocher MS, Mann BJ, Harrast JJ (2006) The international knee documentation committee subjective knee evaluation form: normative data. Am J Sports Med 34(1):128–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198(198):43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tyler TF, McHugh MP, Gleim GW, Nicholas SJ (1999) Association of KT-1000 measurements with clinical tests of knee stability 1 year following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29(9):540–545

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brandsson S, Kartus J, Larsson J, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2000) A comparison of results in middle-aged and young patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 16(2):178–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Blyth MJ, Gosal HS, Peake WM, Bartlett RJ (2003) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over the age of 50 years: 2- to 8-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11(4):204–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (1997) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft in patients with articular cartilage damage. Am J Sports Med 25(5):626–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Streich NA, Zimmermann D, Bode G, Schmitt H (2011) Reconstructive versus non-reconstructive treatment of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. A retrospective matched-pair long-term follow-up. Int Orthop 35(4):607–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Seng K, Appleby D, Lubowitz JH (2008) Operative versus nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in patients aged 40 years or older: an expected-value decision analysis. Arthroscopy 24(8):914–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Khan RM, Prasad V, Gangone R, Kinmont JC (2010) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 40 years using hamstring autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(1):68–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Stein DA, Brown H, Bartolozzi AR (2006) Age and ACL reconstruction revisited. Orthopedics 29(6):533–536

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Trojani C, Sane JC, Coste JS, Boileau P (2009) Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction in patients aged 50 years or older. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95(1):22–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany

    Johannes Struewer & Turgay Efe

  2. Department of Trauma, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany

    Johannes Struewer, Ewgeni Ziring, Ludwig Oberkircher & Karl F. Schüttler

Authors
  1. Johannes Struewer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ewgeni Ziring
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ludwig Oberkircher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Karl F. Schüttler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Turgay Efe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Struewer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Struewer, J., Ziring, E., Oberkircher, L. et al. Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged fifty years: comparison of hamstring graft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 809–817 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1807-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1807-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation