Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The use of hamstrings in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 40 years

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is an increasingly established method even in patients over 40 years old. Recent studies with regard to this procedure used BTB transplants. We did a retrospective follow-up examination on over-40-year-old patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring transplants and compared them to a younger control group. Our hypothesis is that functional outcome after ACL-reconstruction is comparable in patients under and over 40 years of age.

Materials and methods

Retrospective follow-up examinations in 28 patients, 11 women and 17 men. The average age at the time of operation was 43.5 years (range 40–61). The average follow-up period was 30.4 months. Half of the patients had a femoral fixation in TransFix® technique (Arthrex®, Naples, USA), while the other 14 patients had a femoral bioscrew fixation (Arthrex®, Naples, USA). Objectivity was ensured by measurements of anterior tibial translation with the rolimeter (Aircast®). The functional outcome was determined by clinical scores (Tegner activity scale, Lysholm knee score, OAK score and IKDC score). The degree of arthrosis was defined on the basis of tunnelview radiographs and compared to the non-operated site. Functional results and degree of laxity was compared to a sex matched control group (mean age 28.0).

Results

The median values for the Lysholm knee score were 91.5 points (range 69–100), for the OAK score 93.5 points (range 67–100) and for the IKDC score 83.35 points (range 62.1–100). For the Tegner activity scale values of 4.5 points (range 3–8) were obtained. In the IKDC knee examination form we found normal and nearly normal values in 86% and in the OAK examination score good and very good results in 82%. Ninety-three percent had an AP side-to-side difference of <5 mm in the operated knee. Subjectively, 75% reported that they had no feeling of instability, even when practising sport. No significant correlation between functional outcome and patients’ age was present. Furthermore there were no significant differences between the investigated and the younger control group. The most advanced signs of arthrosis were found in the medial compartment of the operated side (degree A: 36%; degree B: 46%; degree C: 14%; degree D: 4%).

Conclusion

The predominantly good results and a high level of patient satisfaction show that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is justified even in over-40-year-old patients with persistend subjective symptomatic anterior knee instability. The indication for reconstruction should be based on individual factors such as level of activity or subjective feeling of instability rather than on a dogmatic age limit. Advanced arthrotic changes compared to the healthy side, might be due to a too long period of preoperative decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson C, Gillquist J (1992) Treatment of acute isolated and combined ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. A long-term follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 20:7–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barber FA, Elrod BF, Mc Guire DA, Paulos LE (1996) Is an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcome age dependent? Arthroscopy 12(6):720–725

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohnsack M, Rühmann O, Lück K, Wirth CJ (2002) The influence of age on the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 140:194–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruyere O, Honore A, Rovati LC, Giacovelli G, Henrotin YE, Seidel L, Reginster YV (2002) Radiologic features poorly predict clinical outcomes in knee osteoarthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 31:13–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ciccotti MG, Lombardo SJ, Nonweiler B, Pink M (1994) Non-operative treatment of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament in middle-aged patients. J Bone Joint Surg 76-A(9):1315–1321

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dye SF, Chew MH (1994) The use of scintigraphy to detect increased osseous metabolic activity about the knee. Instr Course Lect 43:453–69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Freedman KB, D’Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR Jr (2003) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 31(1):2–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gabriel MT, Wong EK, Woo SL, Yagi M, Debski RE (2004) Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res 22(1):85–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganko A, Engebretsen L, Ozer H (2000) The rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(1):36–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gillquist J, Messner K (1999) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the long-term incidence of gonarthrosis. Sports Med 27(3):143–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldblatt JP, Fitzsimmons SE, Balk E, Richmond JC (2005) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 21(7):791–803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hannan MT, Felson DT, Pincus T (2000) Analysis of the discordance between radiographic changes and knee pain in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol 27: 1513–1517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heier KA, Mack DR, Moseley JB, Paine R, Bocell JR (1997) An analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in middle-aged patients. Am J Sports Med 25 (4):527–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hertel P, Behrend H, Cierpinski T, Musahl V, Widjaja G (2005) ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone press-fit fixation: 10-year clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(4):248–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ibrahim SA, Al-Kussary IM, Al-Misfer AR, Al-Mutairi HQ, Ghafar SA, El Noor TA (2005) Clinical evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus gracilis and semitendinosus autograft. Arthroscopy 21(4):412–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jäger M, Wirth CJ (1992) In: Praxis der Orthopädie. Thieme, 2nd edn. Stuttgart, New York, p 982

  17. Jomha NM, Pinczewski LA, Clingeleffer A, Otto DD (1999) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with patellar-tendon autograft and interference screw fixation. The results at seven years. J Bone Joint Surg 81B:775–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlstrom K, Lind J (2004) Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 75(5):594–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs K, Zurakowski D, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ (2002) Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(9):1560–1572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leitze Z, Losee RE, Jokl P, Johnson TR, Feagin JA (2005) Implications of the pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:229–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lethbridge-Cejku M, Scott WW Jr, Reichle R, Ettinger WH, Zonderman A, Costa P, Plato CC, Tobin JD, Hochberg MC (1995) Association of radiographic features of osteoarthritis of the knee with knee pain: data from the Baltimore longitudinal study of ageing. Arthritis Care Res 8:182–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O’Connor Award paper Arthroscopy 19(3):297–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Molsberger A, Lorek M, Jensen KU (1993) Correlation of roentgen findings, intensity of pain and subjectively experienced impairment in gonarthrosis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 131(2):159–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Petersen W, Zantop T (2007) Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:35–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Plancher KD, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Hutton KS (1998) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in patients who are at least forty years old. J Bone Joint Surg 80-A2:184–197

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pollet V, Barrat D, Meirhaeghe E, Vaes P, Handelberg F (2005) The role of the rolimeter in quantifying knee instability compared to the functional outcome of ACL-reconstructed versus conservatively-treated knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(1):12–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Prodromos CC, Han YS, Keller BL, Bolyard RJ (2005) Stability results of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2- to 8-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 21(2):138–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rose T, Hepp P, Venus J, Stockmar C, Josten C, Lill H (2006) Prospective randomized clinical comparison of femoral transfixation versus bioscrew fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction-a preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Feb 8:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shelbourne KD, Gray T (1997) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft followed by accelerated rehabilitation. A two- to nine-year followup. Am J Sports Med 25:786–795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Swirtun LR, Eriksson K, Renstrom P (2006) Who chooses anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and why? A 2-year prospective study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 16(6):441–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tandogan RN, Taser O, Kayaalp A, Taskiran E, Pinar H, Alparslan B, Alturfan A (2004) Analysis of meniscal and chondral lesions accompanying anterior cruciate ligament tears: relationship with age, time from injury, and level of sport. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12(4):262–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tenuta JJ, Arciero RA (1994) Arthroscopic evaluation of meniscal repairs. Factors that effect healing. Am J Sports Med. 22(6):797–802

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Vasara AI, Jurvelin JS, Peterson L, Kiviranta I (2005) Arthroscopic cartilage indentation and cartilage lesions of anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Am J Sports Med 33(3):408–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Viola R, Vianello R (1999) Intra-articular ACL-reconstruction in the over-40-year-old patient. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:25–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wirth CJ (1989) Cruciate ligament injuries of the knee joint. Orthopaede 18:302–314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zysk SP, Refior HJ (2000) Operative or conservative treatment of the acutely torn anterior cruciate ligament in middle-aged patients. A follow-up study of 133 patients between the ages of 40 and 59 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120(1–2):59–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma, Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany

    Bastian Marquass, Pierre Hepp, Thomas Engel, Thomas Düsing & Christoph Josten

  2. Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Friederikenstift Hannover, Humboldtstrasse 5, 30169, Hannover, Germany

    Helmut Lill

Authors
  1. Bastian Marquass
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pierre Hepp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Engel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thomas Düsing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Helmut Lill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christoph Josten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bastian Marquass.

Additional information

A mid-term follow-up retrospective study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marquass, B., Hepp, P., Engel, T. et al. The use of hamstrings in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 40 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127, 835–843 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0317-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0317-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation