Skip to main content
Log in

Knee function and prevalence of osteoarthritis after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: long-term follow-up

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this investigation was to study patient-reported long-term clinical outcome, instrumental stablitity and prevalence of radiological osteoarthritis (OA) a minimum of ten years after isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods

An average of 13.5 years after ACL reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) autograft, 73 patients were evaluated. Inclusion criteria consisted of an isolated ACL rupture and reconstruction with BPTB graft with no associated intra-articular lesions, in particular, cartilage alterations or meniscal lesions. Clinical assessment was performed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner and Lysholm scores. Instrumental anterior laxity testing was carried out with the KT–1000™ arthrometer. Degree of degenerative changes and prevalence of OA were determined using the Kellgren- Lawrence scale.

Results

Mean follow-up was 13.5 years. Mean age was 43.8 years. About 75% of patients were graded A or B according to the IKDC score. The Lysholm score was 90.2 ± 4.8. Radiological assessment reported degenerative changes of grade II OA in 54.2% of patients. Prevalence of grades III or IV OA was found in 20%. The incidence of OA was significantly correlated with stability and function at long-term follow-up.

Conclusion

Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using BPTB autograft resulted in a high degree of patient satisfaction and good clinical results on long-term follow-up. A higher degree of OA developed in 20% of patients and was significantly correlated with increased anterior laxity at long-term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson AF, Irrgang JJ, Kocher MS, Mann BJ, Harrast JJ (2006) International Knee Documentation Committee. The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: normative data. Am J Sports Med 34:128–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Biau DJ, Katsahian S, Kartus J et al (2009) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med 37(12):2470–2478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Church S, Keating JF (2005) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: timing of surgery and the incidence of meniscal tears and degenerative change. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1639–1642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen M, Amaro JT, Ejnisman B et al (2007) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after 10 to 15 years: association between meniscectomy and osteoarthrosis. Arthroscopy 23(6):629–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Drogset JO, Grontvedt T, Robak OR et al (2006) A sixteen-year follow-up of three operative techniques for the treatment of acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:944–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fithian DC, Paxton LW, Goltz DH (2002) Fate of the anterior cruciate ligament- injured knee. Orthop Clin North Am 33:621–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fox JA, Nedeff DD, Bach BR Jr, Spindler KP (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar autograft tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res 402:53–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hertel P, Behrend H, Cierpinski TS, Musahl V, Widjaja G (2005) ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone press-fit fixation: 10-year clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:248–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jarvela T, Kannus P, Jarvinen M (2001) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with or without accompanying injuries: a re-examination of subjects 5 to 9 years after reconstruction. Arthroscopy 17:818–825

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Keays SL, Newcombe PA, Bullock-Saxton JE, Bullock MI, Keays AC (2010) Factors involved in the development of osteoarthritis following anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports Med 38(3):455–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS, Bier F (1963) Genetic factors in generalized Osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 22:237–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Laxdal G, Kartus J, Ejerhed L et al (2005) Outcome and risk factors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a follow-up study of 948 patients. Arthroscopy 21:958–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lebel B, Hulet C, Galaud B, Burdin G, Locker B, Vielpeau C (2008) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bonepatellar tendon-bone autograft: a minimum 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 36(7):1275–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM (2007) The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 35(10):1756–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lohmander LS, Ostenberg A, Englund M, Roos H (2004) High prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, pain, and functional limitations in female soccer players twelve years after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthritis Rheum 50(10):3145–3152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Louboutin H, Debarge R, Richou J et al (2008) Osteoarthritis in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a review of risk factors. Knee 16(4):239–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mihelic R, Jurdana H, Jotanovic Z, Madjarevic T, Tudor A (2011) Long-term results of anterior cruciate reconstruction: a comparison with non-operative treatment with a follow-up of 17–20 years. Int Orthop 35(7):1093–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Möller E, Weidenhielm L, Werner S (2009) Outcome and knee-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:786–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Øiestad BE, Engebretsen L, Storheim K, Risberg MA (2009) Knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 37(7):1434–1443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Øiestad BE, Holm I, Gunderson R, Myklebust G, Risberg A (2010) Knee function and prevalence of knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study with 10 to 15 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med 38(11):2201–2210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 35(4):564–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Refshauge K et al (2006) Long-term outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft: minimum 13-year review. Am J Sports Med 34:721–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schiphof D, Boers M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM (2008) Differences in descriptions of Kellgren and Lawrence grades of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 67(7):1034–1036

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Streich NA, Zimmermann D, Bode G et al (2011) Reconstructive versus non-reconstructive treatment of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. A retrospective matched-pair long-term follow-up. Int Orthop 35(4):607–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tyler TF, McHugh MP, Glim GW et al (1999) Association of KT-1000 measurements with clinical tests of knee stability 1 year following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29(9):540–545

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Von Porat A, Roos EM, Roos H (2004) High prevalence of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: a study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 63:269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu WH, Hackett T, Richmond JC (2002) Effects of meniscal and articular surface status on knee stability, function, and symptoms after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term prospective study. Am J Sports Med 30:845–850

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Struewer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Struewer, J., Frangen, T.M., Ishaque, B. et al. Knee function and prevalence of osteoarthritis after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: long-term follow-up. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 171–177 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1345-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1345-0

Keywords

Navigation