Skip to main content
Log in

Crossmodal coupling of oculomotor control and spatial attention in vision and audition

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fixational eye movements occur involuntarily during visual fixation of stationary scenes. The fastest components of these miniature eye movements are microsaccades, which can be observed about once per second. Recent studies demonstrated that microsaccades are linked to covert shifts of visual attention. Here, we generalized this finding in two ways. First, we used peripheral cues, rather than the centrally presented cues of earlier studies. Second, we spatially cued attention in vision and audition to visual and auditory targets. An analysis of microsaccade responses revealed an equivalent impact of visual and auditory cues on microsaccade-rate signature (i.e. an initial inhibition followed by an overshoot and a final return to the pre-cue baseline rate). With visual cues or visual targets, microsaccades were briefly aligned with cue direction and then opposite to cue direction during the overshoot epoch, probably as a result of an inhibition of an automatic saccade to the peripheral cue. With left auditory cues and auditory targets microsaccades oriented in cue direction. We argue that microsaccades can be used to study crossmodal integration of sensory information and to map the time course of saccade preparation during covert shifts of visual and auditory attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Pilot data of experiment 1 based on a subset of participants were reported in a commentary on Tse et al. (2003). We showed that microsaccade orientations were in good agreement with contralateral shifts of covert attention observed in response to peripherally flashed stimuli.

  2. A Matlab implementation of the algorithm with a short sequence of experimental data can be downloaded at http://www.agnld.uni-potsdam.de/~ralf/micro/.

  3. Note that AV and VA must be primarily looked upon as control studies in the context of VV and AA rather than as experiments for the investigation of crossmodal effects. In our paradigm, the attentional shifts in the target modality induced by the spatial cues in their modality were not implicitly evoked, i.e. target modality was known in advance of target presentation. Therefore, attention shifts in AV and VA are not hard-wired crossmodally cued as for example Spence and Driver (1996, p1007) would say.

References

  • Albano JE, Mishkin M, Westbrook LE, Wurtz RH (1982) Visuomotor deficits following ablation of monkey superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 48:338–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell AH, Corneil BD, Meredith MA, Munoz DP (2001) The influence of stimulus properties on multisensory processing in the awake primate superior colliculus. Can J Exp Psychol 55:123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell AH, Fecteau JH, Munoz DP (2004) Using auditory and visual stimuli to investigate the behavioral and neuronal consequences of reflexive covert orienting. J Neurophysiol 91:2172–2184

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman B, Palca J (1980) The role of microsaccades in high acuity observational tasks. Vis Res 20:813–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Nicholls ME (1997) Hemispheric asymmetries for the temporal resolution of brief auditory stimuli. Percept Psychophys 59:442–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter RHS (2000) The neural control of looking. Curr Biol 10:R291–R293

    Google Scholar 

  • Corneil BD, Munoz DP (1996) The influence of auditory and visual distractors on human orienting gaze shifts. J Neurosci 16:8193–8207

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen FW, Peters EM, Palmer J (2002) The Eyelink toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox. Behav Res Meth Ins C 34:613–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone R, Wessinger CM, Thomas L, Schneider W (1989) Effects of deactivation of lateral pulvinar or superior colliculus on the ability to selectively attend to a visual stimulus. Abstr Soc Neurosci 15:162

    Google Scholar 

  • Deubel H, Schneider W (1996) Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vis Res 36:1827–1837

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle MC, Walker R (2002) Multisensory interactions in saccade target selection: curved saccade trajectories. Exp Brain Res 142:116–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver J, Spence C (1998) Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends Cogn Sci 2:254–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Engbert R, Kliegl R (2003) Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vis Res 43:1035–1045

    Google Scholar 

  • Engbert R, Kliegl R (2004) Microsaccades keep the eyes‘ balance during fixation. Psychol Sci 15:431–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Engbert R, Longtin A, Kliegl R (2002) A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vis Res 42:621–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay JM, Walker R (1999) A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behav Brain Sci 22:661–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Galfano G, Betta E, Turatto M (2004) Inhibition of return in microsaccades. Exp Brain Res 159:400–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafed ZM, Clark JJ (2002) Microsaccades as an overt measure of covert attention shifts. Vis Res 42:2533–2545

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman JE, Subramaniam B (1995) The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys 57:787–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay MF, Sparks DL (1987a) Sensorimotor integration in the primate superior colliculus. I. Motor convergence. J Neurophysiol 57:22–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay MF, Sparks DL (1987b) Sensorimotor integration in the primate superior colliculus. II. Coordinates of auditory signals. J Neurophysiol 57:35–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsbourne M (1970) The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychol 33:193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowler E, Steinman RM (1980) Small saccades serve no useful purpose: reply to a letter by R.W. Ditchburn. Vis Res 20:273–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowler E, Anderson E, Dosher B, Blaser E (1995) The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vis Res 35:1897–1916

    Google Scholar 

  • Kustov AA, Robinson DL (1996) Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements. Nature 384:74–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubrock J, Engbert R, Kliegl R (2005) Microsaccade dynamics during covert attention. Vis Res 45:721–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Rohrer WH, Sparks DL (1988) Population coding of saccadic eye movements by neurons in the superior colliculus. Nature 332:357–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Lueck CJ, Crawford TJ, Savage CJ, Kennard C (1990) Auditory-visual interaction in the generation of saccades in man. Exp Brain Res 82:149–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Conde S, Macknik SL, Hubel DH (2004) The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:229–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz DP, Istvan PJ (1998) Lateral inhibitory interactions in the intermediate layers of the monkey superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 79:1193–1209

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz DP, Dorris MC, Par M, Everling S (2000) On your mark get set: brainstem circuitry underlying saccadic initiation. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 78:934–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls ME, Schier M, Stough CK, Box A (1999) Psychophysical and electrophysiological support for a left hemisphere temporal processing advantage. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 12:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelli DG (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10:437–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingold EM, Stampe DM (2002) Saccadic inhibition in voluntary and reflexive saccades. J Cogn Neurosci 14:371–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingold EM, Stampe DM (2004) Saccadic inhibition in reading. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:194–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter-Lorenz PA, Kinsbourne M, Moscovitch M (1990) Hemispheric control of spatial attention. Brain Cogn 12:240–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter-Lorenz PA, Jha AP, Rosenquist JN (1996) What is inhibited in inhibition of return?. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:367–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Riggio L, Dascola I, Umiltá C (1987) Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 25:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Riggio L, Sheliga BM (1994) Space and selective attention. In: Umiltá C, Moscovitch M (eds) Attention and performance, vol 14, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., pp231–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolfs M, Engbert R, Kliegl R (2004) Microsaccade orientation supports attentional enhancement opposite a peripheral cue. Psychol Sci 15:705–707

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorden C, Driver J (1999) Does auditory attention shift in the direction of an upcoming saccade?. Neuropsychologia 37:357–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Scudder CA, Kaneko CS, Fuchs AF (2002) The brainstem burst generator for saccadic eye movements: a modern synthesis. Exp Brain Res 142:439–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheliga BM, Riggio L, Rizzolatti G (1994) Orienting of attention and eye movements. Exp Brain Res 98:507–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheliga BM, Riggio L, Craighero L, Rizzolatti G (1995) Spatial attention-determined modifications in saccade trajectories. Neuroreport 6:585–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DL (2002) The brainstem control of saccadic eye movements. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:952–964

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Driver J (1996) Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial orienting. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:1005–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Driver J (1998) Auditory and audiovisual inhibition of return. Percept Psychophys 60:125–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein BE, Meredith MA (1993) The merging of the senses. MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse PU, Sheinberg DL, Logothetis NK (2003) Attentional enhancement opposite a peripheral flash revealed using change blindness. Psychol Sci 14:91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurtz RH (1996) Vision for the control of movements. The Friedenwald lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37:2130–2145

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao L, Peck CK (1997) Saccadic eye movements to visual and auditory targets. Exp Brain Res 115:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambarbieri D (2002) The latency of saccades toward auditory targets in humans. Prog Brain Res 140:51–59

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jochen Laubrock, Hans Arne Trukenbrod, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grants KL-955/3 and KL-955/6).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Rolfs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rolfs, M., Engbert, R. & Kliegl, R. Crossmodal coupling of oculomotor control and spatial attention in vision and audition. Exp Brain Res 166, 427–439 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2382-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2382-y

Keywords

Navigation