Skip to main content
Log in

Supplementation with β-carotene or vitamin E protects against increase in anaphylactic response in β-lactoglobulin-sensitized Balb/c mice: ex vivo study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Balb/c mice fed 0 mg, 20 mg of β-carotene (BC) or 50 mg of vitamin E (Vit E) per Kg of diet for 7 weeks were immunized intraperitoneally with β-Lactoglobulin (β-Lg). Specific IgG and IgE anti β-Lg were determined in the mouse sera by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the jejunum was used for assessment of local anaphylactic responses ex vivo in Ussing chambers. Short-circuit current (Isc), a measure of active ion transport, and epithelial conductance (G), a measure of passive ion permeability, were measured for each tissue. Specimens were also processed for examination by histological analysis. Compared with sensitized mice (unsupplemented mice), those fed BC or Vit E had lower β-Lg-specific IgG (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and IgE levels (p < 0.02 and p < 0.01, respectively). A secretory response reflecting local intestinal anaphylaxis was evident in sensitized mice, as indicated by an increase in Isc (p < 0.009). Sensitized mice demonstrated also an enhanced epithelial permeability as measured by conductance (p < 0.03). BC supplementation resulted in a significant decrease in secretory response (p < 0.02) with no effect on the epithelial permeability. Interestingly, the secretory response and epithelial permeability were significantly reduced by supplementation with Vit E (p < 0.02 and p < 0.009, respectively). These findings provide evidence for the first time that both BC and Vit E regulate epithelial ion transport, but it should be noted that only Vit E-supplemented mice showed a decreased tissue conductance, indicating protection from β-Lg-induced epithelial permeability increase. Analysis of histological sections revealed that BC or Vit E treatment clearly reduced the microscopic lesions caused by β-Lg sensitization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang PC, Berin MC, Yu LCH, Conrad DH, Perdue MH (2000) J Clin Investig 106:879–886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Strobel S, Mowat AM (1998) Immunol Today 19:173–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Falth-Magnusson K, Kjellman NIM, Odelram H, Sundqvist T, Magnusson KE (1986) Clin Allergy 16:543–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jalonen T (1991) J Allergy Clin Immunol 88:737–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Troncone R, Caputo N, Florio G, Finelli E (1994) Allergy 49:142–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu LCH, Perdue MH (2001) Immunol Rev 179:61–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chandra RK (1997) Am J Clin Nutr 66:460–463

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sato Y, Akiyama H, Suganuma H, Watanabe T, Nagaoka MH, Inakuma T, Goda Y, Maitani T (2004) Biol Pharm Bull 27:978–984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sato Y, Hiroshi A, Hideki M, Kozue S, Rika N, Shingo I, Takahiro I, Mamoru Y, Motohiro E, Reiko T (2010) J Agric Food Chem 58:7180–7186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Okamoto N, Murata T, Tamai H, Tanaka H, Nagai H (2006) Int Arch Allergy Immunol 80:141–172

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moriguchi S, Muraga M (2000) Vitam Horm 59:305–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bando N, Yamanichi R, Terao J (2003) Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 10:2176–2182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Negaoui H, Kaddouri H, Kheroua O, Saidi D (2009) Am J Immunol 2:56–60

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zellal D, Kaddouri H, Grar H, Belarbi H, Kheroua O, Saidi D (2011) Food Agric Immunol 22:355–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grar H, Kaddouri H, Gourine H, Negaoui H, Kheroua O, Saidi D (2009) Eur Food Res Technol 229:779–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Monaci L, Tregoat V, Arjon J, Hengel V, Anklam E (2006) Eur Food Res Technol 223(149):179

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen SS, Gong J, Liu FT, Mohammed U (2000) Immunology 100:471–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sakai S, Sugawara T, Matsubara K, Hirata T (2009) J Biol Chem 284:28172–28179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Manabe Y, Hirata T, Sugawara T (2014) J Oleo Sci 3:291–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Whitekus MJ, Zhang M, Wang M, Horwitz MA, Nelson SK, Horwitz LZ, Brechun N, Diaz-Sanchez D, Nel AE (2002) J Immunol 168:2560–2567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ray S, Watkins DN, Misso NLA, Thompson PJ (2002) Clin Exp Allergy 32:571–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Saïdi D, Heyman M, Kheroua O, Boudraa G, Bylsma P, Kerroucha R, Chekroun A, Maragi JA, Touhami M, Desjeux JF (1995) CR Acad Sci III 318:683–690

    Google Scholar 

  23. Addou-Benounane S, Tome D, Kheroua O, Saidi D (2004) Int Immunopharmacol 4:1559–1563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. El Mecherfi KE, Rouaud O, Curet S, Negaoui H, Chobert JM, Kheroua O, Saidi D, Haertlé T (2015) Int J Food Sci Technol 50:356–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hagenlocher Y, Lorentz A (2015) Mol Immunol 63:25–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Crowe SE, Perdue MH (1992) Gastroenterology 103:1075–1095

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Benjamin MA, McKay DM, Yang PC, Cameron H, Perdue MH (2000) Gut 47:112–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Elli M, Aydin O, Bilge S, Bozkurt A, Dagdemir A, Pinarli FG, Acar S (2009) Tumori 95:87–90

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gheibi S, Karimipour M, Mahmoodzadeh R, Nargesi AA, Salabati M (2013) Pharm Sci 19:83–90

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Directorate General for Scientific Research and Technological Development (DGRSDT, MESRS, Algeria). The authors would like to thank Mr. Thierno Aliou Diallo for accepting to read our article.

Conflict of interest

The author confirms that this article content has no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

The experiments described in this study comply with the current Algerian legislation covering the protection of animals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadria Grar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grar, H., Dib, W., El Mecherfi, K.E. et al. Supplementation with β-carotene or vitamin E protects against increase in anaphylactic response in β-lactoglobulin-sensitized Balb/c mice: ex vivo study. Eur Food Res Technol 241, 393–398 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-015-2471-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-015-2471-5

Keywords

Navigation