Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship of Rancimat method values at varying temperatures for virgin olive oils

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oxidative stability of VOO is widely determined by Rancimat test, an accelerated method that shortens analysis time. The most usual temperature used for Rancimat analysis is 98 °C; however several authors have reported oxidative stability values at different temperatures higher than 98 °C (110 °C, 120 °C) in order to reduce the analysis time. In this study the effect of temperature on Rancimat method for VOO analysis, measuring the method reproducibility at each temperature, has been evaluated. Method precision expressed as the relative standard deviation (RSD) was ranged from 1.14 to 5.84%, indicating that analytical method was repeatable even at 140 °C. A mathematical model is presented to transform the induction period inter-temperatures (98–140 °C). The results suggested 110 °C as the more adequate temperature since the analysis time was shortened by 63% compared to induction period obtained at 98 °C; the inter-conversion 98–110 °C presented low differences between theoretical value obtained from mathematical model and experimental value obtained by Rancimat apparatus. To shorten analysis time, 84 and 92% respectively, 120 and 130 °C can be used too; although some samples can present higher differences between theoretical and experimental induction period values because of the different oxidation mechanism at each temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams KA (1966) Oils, fats and fatty foods. 4th edn. J&A Churchill, London, p 59

  2. King AE, Roschen HL, Irwin WH (1933) Oil Soap 10:204–207

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hadorn H, Zurcher K (1974) Lebensm Rundsch 70:57

    Google Scholar 

  4. deMan JM, deMan L (1984) J Am Oil Chem Soc 61:534–536

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laubli M, Bruttel P (1986) J Am Oil Chem Soc 63:792–795

    Google Scholar 

  6. deMan JM, Tie F, deMan L (1987) J Am Oil Chem Soc 64:993–996

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gutierrez F (1989) Grasas Aceites 40:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tous J, Romero A, Diaz I (1999) Acta Hort 474:639–642

    Google Scholar 

  9. Servili M, Baldioli M, Miniati E, Montedoro GF (1996) Riv Ital Sostanze Grasse 73:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  10. Uceda M, Frias L (1975) Harvest dates. Evolution of the fruit oil content, oil composition and oil quality. In: Proceedings of the Segundo Seminario Oleicola Internacional, International Olive Oil Council, Cordoba, Spain, pp 125–130

  11. Martinez JM, Muñoz E, Alba J, Lanzón A (1975) Grasas Aceites 26:379–385

    Google Scholar 

  12. European Commission Regulation EEC/2568/91 (1991) Off J Eur Commun L 248:1–82

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vazquez-Roncero A, Janer del Valle C, Janer del Valle ML (1973) Grasas Aceites 24:350–357

    Google Scholar 

  14. IUPAC (1973) In: Paquot C, Hautfenne A (ed) Determination of tocopherols and tocotrienols in vegetable oils and fats by HPLC. Standard methods for the analysis of oils, fats and derivatives, Method 2432, 7th edn. Blackwell, Oxford

  15. Minguez-Mosquera MI, Gandul-Rojas B, Garrido-Fernandez J, Gallardo-Guerrero L (1990) J Am Oil Chem Soc 67:192–196

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jebe TA, Matlock MG, Sleeter RT (1993) J Am Oil Chem Soc 70:1055–1061

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frankel EN (1998) Lipid oxidation. Oily Press, Dundee, Scotland, pp 97–114

  18. Laubli M, Bruttel P (1986) J Am Oil Chem Soc 63:792–795

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hasenhuettl GL, Wan PJ (1992) J Am Oil Chem Soc 69:525–527

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reynhout G (1991) J Am Oil Chem Soc 68:983–984

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gutierrez F, Jimenez B, Ruiz A, Albi MA (1999) J Agric Food Chem 47:121–127

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aparicio R, Roda L, Albi MA, Gutierrez F (1999) J Agric Food Chem 47:4150–4155

    Google Scholar 

  23. Beltran G (2000) Influence of ripening process in Olea europaea L. fruits on the physicochemical characteristics of the oils. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Jaén, Spain

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Maite Ruano for technical assistance with oil analyses. This work has been financed by Project CAO01-019 from Programa de Mejora de la Calidad del Aceite de Oliva y de Aceitunas de Mesa (FAGA-FEOGA Garantía)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Beltrán Maza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mateos, R., Uceda, M., Aguilera, M.P. et al. Relationship of Rancimat method values at varying temperatures for virgin olive oils. Eur Food Res Technol 223, 246–252 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0185-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0185-9

Keywords

Navigation