Abstract
Integral transforms of the disturbing gravitational potential derived from satellite altimetry onto satellite gradiometric data are formulated, investigated and applied in this article. First, corresponding differential operators, that relate the disturbing gravitational potential to the six components of the disturbing gradiometric tensor in the spherical local north-oriented frame, are applied to the spherical Abel-Poisson integral equation. This yields six new integral equations for which respective kernel functions are given in both spectral and spatial forms. Second, truncation error formulas for each of the integral transforms are provided in the spectral form. Also expressions for the corresponding truncation error coefficients are derived. Third, practical estimators for evaluation of the disturbing gravitational gradients are formulated, and their correctness and expected accuracy are investigated. Finally, the practical estimators are applied for validation of a sample of the gradiometric data provided by the GOCE satellite mission. Obtained results demonstrate applicability of the new apparatus as an alternative validation method of the satellite gravitational gradients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen OB, Knudsen P (2009) DNSC08 mean sea surface and mean dynamic topography models. J Geophys Res (Ocean) 114(C11001):12
Arabelos D, Tscherning CC (1990) Simulation of regional gravity field recovery from satellite gravity gradiometer data using collocation and FFT. J Geod 64:363–382
Arabelos D, Tscherning CC (1998) Calibration of satellite gradiometer data aided by ground gravity data. J Geod 72:617–625
Arabelos D, Tscherning CC, Veicherts M (2007) External calibration of GOCE SGG data with terrestrial gravity data: a simulation study. In: Tregoning P, Rizos C (eds) Dynamic planet, IAG Symposia Series, vol 130. Springer, Berlin, pp 337–344
Arfken G (1968) Mathematical methods for physicists. Academic Press, New York
Barzaghi R, Tselfes N, Tziavos IN, Vergos GS (2009) Geoid and high resolution topography modelling in the mediterranean from gravimetry, altimetry and GOCE data: evaluation by simulation. J Geod 83:751–772
Benada JR (1997) Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center (PO.DAAC) Merged GDR (TOPEX/POSEIDON). Generation B, Users Handbook, Version 2.0, JPL PO.DAAC D-11007. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA
Bouman J, Bosch W, Sebera J (2011) Assessment of systematic errors in the computation of gravity gradients from satellite altimetry. Mar Geod 34:85–107
Bouman J, Koop R (2003) Geodetic methods for calibration of GRACE and GOCE. Space Sci Rev 108:293–303
Bouman J, Koop R, Tscherning CC, Visser P (2004) Calibration of GOCE SGG data using high–low SST, terrestrial gravity data and global gravity field models. J Geod 78:124–137
Bölling C, Grafarend EW (2005) Ellipsoidal spectral properties of the Earth’s gravitational potential and its first and second derivatives. J Geod 79:300–330
Denker H (2003) Computation of gravity gradients for Europe for calibration/validation of GOCE data. In: Tziavos IN (ed) Gravity and geoid 2002, 3rd Meeting of the IGGC. Ziti Editions, pp 287–292
EGG-C (2010) GOCE L2 product data handbook. Issue 4, Revision 3, GO-MA-HPF-GS-0110. The European GOCE Gravity Consortium EGG-C
Eicker A (2012) Gravity field refinement by radial basis functions from in-situ satellite data. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe C, No. 676, München, Germany
Eicker A, Mayer-Gürr T, Ilk KH (2005) Global gravity field solutions based on a simulation scenario of GRACE SST data and regional refinements by GOCE SGG observations. In: Jekeli C, Bastos L, Fernandes L (eds) Gravity, geoid and space missions. IAG Symposia Series, vol 129. Springer, Berlin, pp 66–71
Eicker A, Schall J, Kusche J (2014) Regional gravity modelling from spaceborne data: case studies with GOCE. Geophys J Int 196:1431–1440
ESA (1999) Gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation mission. ESA SP-1233(1), Report for mission selection of the four candidate earth explorer missions, ESA Publication Division
Eshagh M (2009a) On satellite gravity gradiometry. Doctoral Thesis, TRITA-TEC-PHD 09–004, Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Geodesy, Stockholm, Sweden
Eshagh M (2009b) Towards validation of satellite gradiometric data using modified version of 2nd order partial derivatives of extended Stokes’ formula. Artif Satell 44:103–129
Eshagh M (2010) Least-squares modification of extended Stokes’ formula and its second-order radial derivative for validation of satellite gravity gradiometry data. J Geodyn 49:92–104
Eshagh M (2011a) Inversion of satellite gradiometry data using statistically modified integral formulas for local gravity field recovery. Adv Space Res 47:74–85
Eshagh M (2011b) On integral approach to regional gravity field modelling from satellite gradiometric data. Acta Geophys 59:29–54
Eshagh M (2011c) Semi-stochastic modification of second-order radial derivative of Abel-Poisson’s formula for validating satellite gravity gradiometry data. Adv Space Res 47:757–767
Eshagh M (2011d) The effect of spatial truncation error on the integral inversion of satellite gravity gradiometry data. Adv Space Res 47:1238–1247
Eshagh M, Romeshkani M (2011) Generation of vertical–horizontal and horizontal–horizontal gravity gradients using stochastically modified integral estimators. Adv Space Res 48:1341–1358
Freeden W, Volker M, Nutz H (2002) Satellite-to-satellite tracking and satellite gravity gradiometry (Advanced techniques for high-resolution geopotential field determination). J Eng Math 43:19–56
Freeden W, Nutz H (2011) Satellite gravity gradiometry as tensorial inverse problem. Int J Geomath 2:177–218
Grombein T, Seitz K, Heck B (2010) Untersuchungen zur effizienten Berechnung topographischer Effekte auf den Gradiententensor am Fallbeispiel der Satellitengradiometriemission GOCE. KIT Scientific Reports 7547, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany, p 94. ISBN 978-3-86644-510-9
Haagmans R, Prijatna K, Omang OCD (2003) An alternative concept for validation of GOCE gradiometry results based on regional gravity. In: Tziavos IN (ed) Gravity and Geoid 2002, 3rd Meeting of the IGGC. Ziti Editions, pp 281–286
Heck B (1979) Zur lokalen Geoidbestimmung aus terrestrischen Messungen vertikaler Schweregradienten. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe C, No. 259, München, Germany
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. Freeman and Co., San Francisco
Kellogg OD (1929) Foundations of potential theory. Dover Publications, New York
Kern M, Haagmans R (2005) Determination of gravity gradients from terrestrial gravity data for calibration and validation of gradiometric data. In: Jekeli C, Bastos L, Fernandes L (eds) Gravity, geoid and space missions. IAG Symposia Series, vol 129. Springer, Berlin, pp 95–100
Koop R, Visser P, Tscherning CC (2001) Aspects of GOCE calibration. In: Proceedings of the international GOCE user workshop, vol WPP-188. ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp 95–100
Lieb V, Bouman J, Dettmering D, Fuchs M, Schmidt M (2015) Combination of GOCE gravity gradients in regional gravity field modelling using radial basis functions. In: Sneeuw N (Ed.) Proceedings of the 8th Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, Italy, June 17–21, 2013, IAG Symposia Series, vol 142. Springer, Berlin (Accepted)
Martinec Z (2003) Green’s function solution to spherical gradiometric boundary-value problems. J Geod 77:41–49
Moritz H (2000) Geodetic reference system 1980. J Geod 74:128–133
Müller J, Jarecki F, Wolf KI (2003) External calibration and validation of GOCE gradients. In: Tziavos IN (ed) Gravity and geoid 2002, 3rd Meeting of the IGGC. Ziti Editions, pp 287–292
Novák P, Grafarend EW (2006) The effect of topographical and atmospheric masses on spaceborne gravimetric and gradiometric data. Stud Geophys et Geod 50:549–582
Novák P, Tenzer R (2013) Gravitational gradients at satellite altitudes in global geophysical studies. Surv Geophys 34:653–673
Pail R (2003) Local gravity field continuation for the purpose of in-orbit calibration of GOCE SGG observations. Adv Geosci 1:11–18
Paul M (1973) A method of evaluation the truncation error coefficients for geoidal heights. Bull Géodésique 110:413–425
Pavlis NK (1991) Estimation of geopotential differences over intercontinental locations using satellite and terrestrial measurements. Report No. 409, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2012) The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). J Geophys Res (Solid Earth) 117(B04406):38
Rapp RH (1989) The treatment of permanent tidal effects in the analysis of satellite altimeter data for sea surface topography. Manuscr Geod 14:368–372
Rummel R, Haagmans R (1991) Gravity gradients from satellite altimetry. Mar Geod 14:1–12
Rummel R, Teunissen M, van Gelderen M (1989) Uniquely and overdetermined geodetic boundary value problems by least squares. Bull Géodésique 63:1–33
Schwarz KP, Krynski J (1977) Improvement of the geoid in local areas by satellite gradiometry. Bull Géodésique 51:163–176
Šprlák M (2012) A graphical user interface application for evaluation of the gravitational tensor components generated by a level ellipsoid of revolution. Comput Geosci 46:77–83
Šprlák M, Sebera J, Vaľko M, Novák P (2014) Spherical integral formulas for upward/downward continuation of gravitational gradients onto gravitational gradients. J Geod 88:179–197
Tapley BD, Flechtner F, Bettadpur S, Watkins MM (2013) The status and future prospect for GRACE after the first decade. EOS Trans., Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract G22A–01
Thalhammer M (1994) The geographical truncation error in satellite gravity gradiometer measurements. Manuscr Geod 19:45–54
Thalhammer M (1995) Regionale Gravitationsfeldbestimmung mit zukünftigen Satellitenmissionen (SST und Gradiometrie). Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe C, Nr. 437, München, Germany
Tóth G, Rózsa S, Ádám J, Tziavos IN (2002) Gravity field modeling by torsion balance data—a case study in Hungary. In: Ádám J, Schwarz KP (eds) Vistas for geodesy in the new millennium. IAG Symposia Series, vol 125. Springer, Berlin, pp 193–198
Tscherning CC (1989) A local study of the influence of sampling rate, number of observed components and instrument noise on 1 deg. mean geoid and gravity anomalies determined from satellite gravity gradiometer measurements. Ric di Geod Topogr Fotogramm 5:139–146
van Gelderen M, Rummel R (2001) The solution of the general geodetic boundary value problem by least squares. J Geod 75:1–11
Visser P, Koop R, Klees R (2000) Scientific data production quality assessment. In: Sünkel H (ed) From Eötvös to Milligal, Final Report, ESA/ESTEC, Contract No. 13392/98/NL/GD, Graz, Austria, pp 157–176
Vossepoel FC (2007) Uncertainties in the mean dynamic topography before the launch of the Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE). J Geophys Res (Ocean) 112(C05010):20
Wolf KI (2007) Kombination globaler Potentialmodelle mit terrestrische Schweredaten für die Berechnung der zweiten Ableitungen des Gravitationspotentials in Satelitenbahnhöhe. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe C, No. 603, München, Germany
Wolf KI, Denker H (2005) Upward continuation of ground data for GOCE calibration. In: Jekeli C, Bastos L, Fernandes L (eds) Gravity, geoid and space missions. IAG Symposia Series, vol 129. Springer, Berlin, pp 60–65
Woodworth PL, Hughes CW, Bingham RJ, Gruber T (2012) Towards worldwide height system unification using ocean information. J Geod Sci 2:302–318
Yildiz H (2012) A study of regional gravity field recovery from GOCE vertical gravity gradient data in the Auvergne test area using collocation. Stud Geophy et Geod 56:171–184
Zielińsky JB, Petrovskaya MS (2003) The possibility of the calibration/validation of the GOCE data with the balloon-borne gradiometer. Adv Geosci 1:149–153
Acknowledgments
Michal Šprlák and Pavel Novák were supported by the project no. GA15-08045S of the Czech Science Foundation. Eliška Hamáčková was supported by the project SGS-2013-024. The authors thank P. L. Woodworth for providing the mean dynamic topography models. Thoughtful and constructive comments of three anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also extended to the Editor-in-Chief R. Klees and the responsible editor C. Jekeli for handling our manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: Global integrals of the disturbing gravitational potential
To obtain the spectral form of truncation errors for the integral transforms of Eq. (13), some global integrals of the disturbing gravitational potential are needed. The global integrals are summarized as follows, see, e.g. Thalhammer (1994) and Eshagh (2009a):
Appendix B: Spectral and recurrence representation of the modified truncation error coefficients
The modified truncation error coefficients \(Q_{n}^{\bullet }\), \(Q_{n}^{\bullet t}\) and \(Q_{n}^{\bullet tt}\) in the spectral form are defined in the following proposition:
Proposition 8
The spectral representations of the modified truncation error coefficients are:
where:
Proposition 8 follows from Eqs. (40)–(42) and from the spectral form of the modified isotropic kernel \(K^{\bullet }\) given by Eq. (37). Note that Eq. (52) defines the so-called Paul coefficients, which can be evaluated by recurrence formulas, see, e.g. Paul (1973).
The modified truncation error coefficients \(Q_{n}^{\bullet }\), \(Q_{n}^{\bullet t}\) and \(Q_{n}^{\bullet tt}\) may be defined by the following set of recurrence formulas:
Proposition 9
The recurrence representations of the modified truncation error coefficients are:
\(\underline{{\mathbf {(A) for the coefficient}}\ Q_{0}^{\bullet }}\):
\(\underline{{\mathbf {(B) for the coefficient}}\ Q_{0}^{\bullet t}}\):
\(\underline{{\mathbf {(C) for the coefficient}}\ Q_{0}^{\bullet tt}}\):
where:
and:
To prove Proposition 9, we start with the modified truncation error coefficient \(Q_{n}^{\bullet }\). First, the spatial form of the modified isotropic kernel \(K^{\bullet }\), see Eq. (37), is inserted into Eq. (40). Second, we make use of the analytical solution for the resulting integral given by Pavlis (1991, Eq. A. 29a–b) and Eq. (53) immediately follow. The modified truncation error coefficients \(Q_{n}^{\bullet t}\) and \(Q_{n}^{\bullet tt}\) are the first and second derivatives of \(Q_{n}^{\bullet }\) with respect to the variable \(t\), see Eqs. (41), (42). Performing the differentiations of Eq. (53), we get the recurrence formulas of Eqs. (54) and (55).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Šprlák, M., Hamáčková, E. & Novák, P. Alternative validation method of satellite gradiometric data by integral transform of satellite altimetry data. J Geod 89, 757–773 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0813-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0813-5