Skip to main content
Log in

Uniquely and overdetermined geodetic boundary value problems by least squares

  • Published:
Bulletin géodésique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Least-squares by observation equations is applied to the solution of geodetic boundary value problems (g.b.v.p.). The procedure is explained solving the vectorial Stokes problem in spherical and constant radius approximation. The results are Stokes and Vening-Meinesz integrals and, in addition, the respective a posteriori variance-covariances.

Employing the same procedure the overdeterminedg.b.v.p. has been solved for observable functions potential, scalar gravity, astronomical latitude and longitude, gravity gradients Гxz, Гyz, and Гzz and three-dimensional geocentric positions. The solutions of a large variety of uniquely and overdeterminedg.b.v.p.'s can be obtained from it by specializing weights. Interesting is that the anomalous potential can be determined—up to a constant—from astronomical latitude and longitude in combination with either {Гxzyz} or horizontal coordinate corrections Δx and Δy, or both. Dual to the formulation in terms of observation equations the overdeterminedg.b.v.p.'s can as well be solved by condition equations.

Constant radius approximation can be overcome in an iterative approach. For the Stokes problem this results in the solution of the “simple” Molodenskii problem. Finally defining an error covariance model with a Krarup-type kernel first results were obtained for a posteriori variance-covariance and reliability analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • W. BAARDA (1967) Statistical Concepts in Geodesy, Netherlands Geodetic Commission New Series, 2, 4. Delft.

  • A. BODE, E.W. GRAFAREND (1981) The Spacelike Molodensky Problem Including the Rotational Term of the Gravity Potential, manuscripta geodaetica, 6, pp. 33–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • O.L. COLOMBO (1981) Numerical Methods for Harmonic Analysis on the Sphere, Dept. Geodetic Science, 310, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.W. GRAFAREND (1979) The Bruns Transformation and a Dual Set-up of Geodetic Observation Equations, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, National Geodetic Survey, Rockville, Md

    Google Scholar 

  • E.W. GRAFAREND, B. SCHAFFRIN (1986).The Overdetermined Geodetic Boundary Value Problem, in: proc. Int. Symp. Figure and Dynamics of the Earth Moon and Planets, Prague, Vol. 1.

  • B. HECK (1982). On Various Formulations of the Geodetic Boundary Value Problem Using the Vertical Gradients of Gravity, in: proc. Intern. Symp. Figure of the Earth, Moon and Other Planets, Prague, pp. 155–178.

  • W. HEISKANEN, H. MORITZ (1967) Physical Geodesy, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. HÖRMANDER (1976): The Boundary Problems of Physical Geodesy, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., 62, pp. 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.R. JEKELI, R.H. RAPP (1980). Accuracy of the Determination of Mean Anomalies and Mean Geoid Undulations from a Satellite Gravity Field Mission, Dept. Geodetic Science, 307, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. KRARUP (1969): A Contribution to the Mathematical Foundation of Physical Geodesy, 44, Danish Geod. Inst., Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. KRARUP (1973): Letters on Molodensky's Problem, Commun, to the members of IAG-SSG 4.31, Copenhagen.

  • T. KRARUP (1981): A Convergence Problem in Collocation Theory, Bollettino di Geodesia e Scienze Affini, 40, 3, pp. 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. MEISSL (1971): A Study of Covariance Functions Related to the Earth's Disturbing Potential, Dept. Geodetic Science, 155, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.S. MOLODENSKII, V.F. EREMEEV, M.I. YURKINA (1962): Methods for Study of the External Gravitational Field and Figure of the Earth, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. MORITZ (1975): Integral Formulas and Collocation, Dept. Geodetic Science, 234, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. MORITZ (1980): Advanced Physical Geodesy, Wichmann, Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. RUMMEL, P.J.G. TEUNISSEN (1982): A Connection Between Geometric and Gravimetric Geodesy—Some Remarks on the Role of the Gravity Field, in: “Daar heb ik veertig jaar over nagedacht ...”, Vol. II, Delft.

  • R. RUMMEL (1984): From the Observational Model to Gravity Parameter Estimation, in: proc. Beijing Intern. Summar School on Local Gravity Field Approximation, ed.: K.P. Schwarz, Beijing.

  • R. RUMMEL, P.J.G. TEUNISSEN (1986): Geodetic Boundary Value Problem and Linear Inference, in: Proc. Int. Symp. Figure and Dynamics of the Earth, Moon and Planets, Prague, Vol. I, pp. 227–264.

  • R. RUMMEL, P.J.G. TEUNISSEN (1987): Height Datum Definition, Height Datum Connection and the Role of the Geodetic Boundary Value Problem, (submitted for publication).

  • F. SACERDOTE, F. SANSÒ (1985): Overdetermined Boundary Value Problems of Physical Geodesy, manuscripta geodaetica, 10, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. SANSÒ (1981) Recent Advances in the Theory of the Geodetic Boundary Value Problem. Rev. Geoph. Space Physics, 19, 3, pp. 437–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. SANSÒ (1986): The Wiener Integral and the Overdetermined Boundary Value Problems of Physical Geodesy, Milano (in print).

  • G.G. STOKES (1849): On the Variation of Gravity on the Surface of the Earth, Trans. Cambridge Phil. Soc., Vol. 8, pp. 672–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.J.G. TEUNISSEN (1985): Quality Control in Geodetic Networks, in: Optimization and Design of Geodetic Networks, eds.: E.W. Grafarend & F. Sansò, pp. 526–547, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rummel, R., Teunissen, P. & van Gelderen, M. Uniquely and overdetermined geodetic boundary value problems by least squares. Bull. Geodesique 63, 1–33 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02520226

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02520226

Keywords

Navigation