Skip to main content
Log in

Does large volatility help?—stochastic population forecasting technology in explaining real estate price process

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Population Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the association between real estate demand and the volatility of population changes. In a financial liberalized housing market, the housing mortgage loan implies insurance function to homeowners through the default option. Larger expected volatilities in the population imply a higher value of the default option. When analyzing the impact of the long-term population development on housing prices, the traditional deterministic population forecasting employed by previous research provides limited credibility. By means of the newly developed stochastic population forecasting methodology and counterfactual numerical simulations, we found a huge volatility associated with long-term population forecasting. A positive correlation between the expected volatility of population changes and real estate demand is ascertained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hoynes and McFadden (1994)

  2. The Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China.

  3. http://www.yicai.com/news/2010/06/366162.html

  4. Software R has been adopted to generate the multivariate normal distributed variables for changes in population, housing stock, and income. The singular value decomposition method was used in generating the multivariate normal distributed variables.

  5. The data is from the 2009 Shanghai Statistics Yearbook. For the variables of income, population and housing supply, we use the published data on individual average disposable income, residential population and the area of newly constructed residential dwellings as the proxies.

  6. For the minimum age of childbearing, β 4, we found that estimates were invariably equal to 15 years.

  7. 17.38, 17.32, and 16.76 million are for 2015, 2030, and 2040, respectively.

  8. The price is published for January 2007 on http://www.ehomeday.com.

  9. It is obtained by (predicted population mean in Year 2030 – population in Year 2000)/ population in Year 2000.

  10. It is obtained by ((upper bound of 95% confidence interval – population in Year 2000)/ population in Year 2000)^2.

  11. The “equivalent” population concept has been introduced by Mankiw and Weil (1989) and employed extensively afterwards. The core of “equivalent” population is to transform the nominal population number into another population number, which denotes an artificial population size as if all the people are at the same age group.

  12. 1.86, 5.03, and 10.08 million are for group younger than 25 years old, middle age group between 25 and 55 years old, and the old group with age above 55 years old, respectively.

  13. \({\rm log}\left( {Y_t } \right)_{\rm adj} = {\rm log}\left( {Y_t } \right)-log\left( {Y_t } \right)_{\rm hat} ,\,\quad {\rm where} \quad {\rm log}\left( {Y_t } \right)_{\rm hat} =\hat {\gamma }_0 +\hat {\gamma }_1 {\rm log}\left( {N_t } \right)+\hat {\gamma }_2 {\rm log}\left( {K_t } \right).\)

    \({\rm log}\left( {K_t } \right)_{\rm adj} = {\rm log}\left( {K_t } \right)-{\rm log}\left( {K_t } \right)_{\rm hat} ,\quad {\rm where} \quad {\rm log}\left( {K_t } \right)_{\rm hat} =\hat {\lambda }_0 +\hat {\lambda }_1 \,{\rm log}\left( {N_t } \right).\)

References

  • Abel AB (2001) Will bequests attenuate the predicted meltdown in stock prices when baby boomers retire? Rev Econ Stat 83(4):589–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abel AB (2003) The effects of a baby boom on stock prices and capital accumulation in the presence of social security. Econometrica 71(2):551–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ameriks J, Zeldes SP (2000) How do household portfolio shares vary with age? TIAA-CREF Working Paper

  • Bergantino S (1998) Life cycle investment behavior, demographics, and asset prices. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Economics, MIT

  • Brooks RJ (1998) Asset market and saving effects of demographic transitions. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Economics, Yale University

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y (2003) The impact of migration to shanghai on the performance of the social pension system. Master Thesis, Department of Economics, University of Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • China National Committee on Ageing (2008) The ageing of population and its implications in China. Country Statement. Available at http://en.cncaprc.gov.cn

  • Crawford GW, Rosenblatt E (1995) Efficient mortgage default option exercise: evidence from the mortgage insurance industry. J Real Estate Res 10(5):543–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham D, Hendershott PH (1986) Pricing FHA mortgage default insurance NBER Working Paper No. W1382

  • Danthine JP, Donaldson JB (2002) Intermediate financial theory. Prentice Hall, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Epperson JF, Kau JB, Kennan DC, Muller WJ (1985) Pricing default risk in mortgage. Rev Econ Stat 13(3):261–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M, Leclerc A (2000) Demographic changes and real housing prices in Canada. Working Paper 00–06, Economics Department, University of Sherbrook

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster C, Van Order R (1984) An option-based model of mortgage default. Hous Financ Rev 3(4):351–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster C, Van Order R (1985) FHA terminations: a prelude to rational mortgage pricing. Rev Econ Stat 13(3):273–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Girouard N, Kennedy M, Noord P, André C (2006) Recent house price developments: the role of fundamentals. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 475

  • Green MH (2003) Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2009) Moral and social constraints to strategic default on mortgage. NBER Working Paper No. w15145

  • Han X (2010) Housing demand in Shanghai: a discrete choice approach. China Econ Rev 21(2):355–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoem J, Hansen HO, Madsen D, Løvgreen Nielsen J, Olsen EM, Rennermalm B (1981) Experiments in modeling recent Danish fertility curves. Demography 18(2):231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoynes HW, McFadden D (1994) The impact of demographic on housing and non-housing wealth in the United States. NBER Working Paper No. w4666

  • Kau JB, Kim T (1994) Waiting to default: the value of delay. Rev Econ Stat 22(3):539–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau JB, Keenan DC, Smurov AA (2004) Reduced-form mortgage valuation. Working Paper in Department of Insurance, Legal Studies and Real Estate, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia

  • Keilman N, Pham D, Hetland A (2001) Norway’s uncertain demographic future. Working Paper in Statistics Norway, Oslo. ISBN 82–537–5002–1

  • Keilman N (2002) TFR predictions and Brownian motion theory. Yearb Popul Res Fin 38:209–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutkepohl H (2005) New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw NG, Weil DN (1989) The baby boom, the baby bust, and the housing market. Reg Sci Urban Econ 19(2):235–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1993) Demographics, the housing market, and the welfare of the elderly. In: Wise D (ed) Studies in the economics of ageing. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 225–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohtake F, Shintani M (1996) The effect of demographics on japanese housing market. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26(2):189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortalo-Magne F, Rady S (1999) Boom in, bust out: young household and the housing price cycle. Eur Econ Rev 43(4–6):755–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poterba JM (2001) Demographic structure and asset returns. Rev Econ Stat 83(4):565–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel J (1998) Stocks for the long run. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandell KD (1995) How ruthless is mortgage default? A review and synthesis of the evidence. J Hous Res 6(2):245–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo PS (1994) Age distributions and returns of financial assets. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper 1994–002B

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous referees, Nico Keilman, James M. Poterba, Olav Bjerkholt, John K. Dagsvik, Erik Biorn, Kaiji Chen, and Ke Wang for their valuable comments. We also gratefully acknowledge the support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Research Project: #70632002, Fudan University, China) and the sponsor from Shanghai Pujiang Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuehui Han.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Alessandro Cigno

Appendix

Appendix

Starting from Eq. 14, we can get

$$ \label{A1} P=\frac{1}{K}\ast N\ast (W+(1-m)Y)\ast s. $$
(29)

Based on Eq. 29, we can have

$$ \begin{array}{rll} \label{A2} \hfill {\mathop P\limits^\bullet } &=& \frac{\left( {\frac{1}{K'}\times N'\times (W+(1-m)Y')\times s} \right)-\left( {\frac{1}{K}\times N\times (W+(1-m)Y)\times s} \right)}{\left( {\frac{1}{K}\times N\times (W+(1-m)Y)\times s} \right)}, \\ &=& \frac{\left( {\frac{1}{K'}\times N'\times (W+(1-m)Y')\times s} \right)}{\left( {\frac{1}{K}\times N\times (W+(1-m)Y)\times s} \right)}-1, \\ &=& \left[ {\left( {\frac{K}{K'}\times \frac{N'}{N}\times \frac{(W+(1-m)Y')}{(W+(1-m)Y)}} \right)} \right]-1. \end{array} $$
(30)

The variance of \(\mathop P\limits^\bullet \) can be expressed as

$$ \begin{array}{rll} \label{A3} {\rm var}(\mathop P\limits^\bullet ) &=& {\rm var}\left( {\frac{K}{K'}\times \frac{N'}{N}\times \frac{(W+(1-m)Y')}{(W+(1-m)Y)}} \right), \\ {\rm var}(\mathop P\limits^\bullet ) &=& {\rm var}\left( {\frac{K}{K'}} \right)+ {\rm var}\left( {\frac{N'}{N}} \right)+ {\rm var}\left( {\frac{(W+(1-m)Y')}{(W+(1-m)Y)}} \right)\\ && + \ {\rm cov}\left(\frac{K}{K'},\frac{N'}{N}\right)+{\rm cov}\left( {\frac{K}{K'},\frac{(W+(1-m)Y')}{(W+(1-m)Y)}} \right) \\ && + \ {\rm cov}\left(\frac{N'}{N},\frac{(W+(1-m)Y')}{(W+(1-m)Y)}\right), \\ &=& {\rm var}\left( {\frac{K}{K'}} \right)+ {\rm var}\left( {\frac{N'}{N}} \right)+ {\rm var}\left( {\frac{(1-m)Y'}{(W+(1-m)Y)}} \right) \\ && + \ {\rm cov}\left(\frac{K}{K'},\frac{N'}{N}\right)+{\rm cov}\left( {\frac{K}{K'},\frac{(W+(1-m)Y')}{(W+(1-m)Y)}} \right) \\ && + \ {\rm cov}\left(\frac{N'}{N},\frac{(W+(1-m)Y')}{(W+(1-m)Y)}\right). \end{array} $$
(31)

To get the testable empirical counterpart of the Eq. 29, we first transform the variable into logarithm.

$$ {\rm log}\left( P \right)= {\rm log}\left( N \right)+ {\rm log}\left( {W+(1-m)Y} \right)- {\rm log}\left( K \right)+ {\rm log}\left( s \right), $$

Then, we have the empirical regression specification as

$$ \label{A4} {\rm log}\left( {P_t } \right)=\alpha +\beta _1 {\rm log}\left( {N_t } \right)+\beta _2 {\rm log}\left( {Y_t } \right)+\beta _3 {\rm log}\left( {K_t } \right)+\varepsilon _t . $$
(32)

If we regress Eq. 32 directly, it is going to be serious multicollinearities between the variables as testified by the correlations in Table 9. Therefore, we use the adjusted income and housing supplyFootnote 13 as the regressor instead. The regression results are presented in Table 10.

Table 9 Correlations between housing price, population, income, and housing supply
Table 10 Estimation results of Eq. 32
Table 11 Forecast of net immigration for year 2006 to 2021 (Units: 10,000)
Table 12 Events of cohort of new arrival of floating population of 1995 till 1997 (Units: 1,000)
Fig. 3
figure 3

New residential land area allocated in Shanghai from 1995 to 2008. Source: 2002 and 2009 Shanghai statistics yearbook. For years before 2000, the new residential land volumes are published by the Statistics Yearbook 2000. For years after 2000, the new residential land areas are not published directly. Rather, the traded land volumes are published, which include both the new and the re-traded land. To proxy the new land volume, we subtract the residential volume of the “movers” from the total number

Fig. 4
figure 4

Age-specific birth rates, empirical values, and gamma curve fit for selected years

Fig. 5
figure 5

Stochastic predictions for TFR for Shanghai, with restriction (0.4–6)

Fig. 6
figure 6

Stochastic predictions for mean age at childbearing for Shanghai

Fig. 7
figure 7

Stochastic prediction for variance at age of childbearing for Shanghai

Fig. 8
figure 8

Stochastic predictions for life expectance at birth, male

Fig. 9
figure 9

Stochastic predictions for life expectance at birth, female

Fig. 10
figure 10

Stochastic population forecasting for 2015

Fig. 11
figure 11

Stochastic populations forecasting for 2030

Fig. 12
figure 12

Population pyramid in 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, Y., Han, X. Does large volatility help?—stochastic population forecasting technology in explaining real estate price process. J Popul Econ 26, 323–356 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-010-0349-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-010-0349-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation