Skip to main content
Log in

Honeyeater (Meliphagidae) pollination and the floral biology of PolynesianHeliconia (Heliconiaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary pollinator of Polynesian heliconias,Heliconia laufao andH. paka, is the Wattled Honeyeater,Foulehaio carunculata. This report is the first documentation of pollination by honeyeaters in the genusHeliconia and the first record ofF. carunculata as a pollinator of a plant species. The Polynesian heliconias bear inflorescences that produce 2–4 hermaphroditic flowers per day for a period of 2–3 months. Each flower secretes abundant nectar (125–184 εl) with low sugar concentration (15–18% sucrose-equivalents, weight per weight basis) which is available at anthesis just before dawn. Ninety percent of flower visits occur between anthesis and mid-morning. The honeyeaters perch on inflorescence bracts, and probing of the flower results in pollen deposition on the head and bill from where pollen is transferred between flowers. No statements on compatibility can be made forHeliconia paka; however,Heliconia laufao appears to be self-compatible. Calculations of energetic values of nectar of the Polynesian heliconias and Daily Energy Expenditures ofF. carunculata suggest that populations ofH. laufao andH. paka serve as rich energy resources for their pollinators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, D. P., 1992: Correlation between nectar supply and aggression in territorial honeyeaters: causation or coincidence? — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.30: 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolten, A. B., Feinsinger, P., Baker, H. G., Baker, I., 1979: On the calculation of sugar concentration in flower nectar. — Oecologia41: 301–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. D., Hopkins, M. J. G., 1995: A test of pollinator specificity and morphological convergence between nectarivorous birds and rainforest tree flowers in New Guinea. — Oecologia103: 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, P. A., 1983: Observations on the natural history of Samoan bats. — Mammalia47: 519–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Chiropterophily and ornithophily inFreycinetia (Pandanaceae) in Samoa. — Pl. Syst. Evol.144: 277–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. L., Stewart, A. M., 1988: Reproductive biology ofPhormium tenax: a honeyeater-pollinated species — New Zealand J. Bot.26: 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delph, L. F., Lively, C. M., 1989: The evolution of floral color change: pollinator attraction versus physiological constraints inFuchsia excorticata. — Evolution43: 1252–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, P. K., 1994: Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri, K., van der Pijl, L., 1979: The principles of pollination ecology. 3rd edn. — Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, H. A., 1976: The honeyeaters of Kangaroo Island. — S. Austral. Orn.27: 134–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979: Birds as pollinators of Australian plants. — New Zealand Bot.17: 509–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B., 1975: Energetics of pollination. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.6: 139–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, S. D., Burbidge, A. H., 1978: Assortative pollination by Red Wattebirds in a hybrid population ofAnigozanthus Labill (Haemodoraceae). — Austral. J. Bot.26: 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986: Speciation and bird-pollinated plants in south-western Australia. — InFord, H. A., Paton, D. C., (Eds): The dynamic partnership: birds and plants in Southern Australia, pp. 20–31. Adelaide: SA Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito, A., Armstrong, J. E., 1993: Floral biology ofHornstedtia scottiana (Zingiberaceae) in a lowland rain forest of Australia. — Biotropica25: 281–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, C. A., Inouye, D. W., 1993: Techniques for pollination biologists. — Colorado: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, A., 1985: An introductory ecological biogeography of the Australo-PacificMeliphagidae. — New Zealand J. Zool.12: 605–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keighery, G. J., 1982: Bird pollinated plants in Western Australia. — InArmstrong, J. A., Powell, J. H., Richards, A. J., (Eds): Pollination and evolution, pp. 77–89. — Sydney: Royal Botanic Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, W. J., 1983: Self-incompatibility systems in Central AmericanHeliconia. — Evolution37: 735–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1985: Bat pollination of an Old WorldHeliconia. — Biotropica17: 302–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1990: Taxonomy of Old WorldHeliconia (Heliconiaceae). — Allertonia6: 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Phylogeny of theZingiberanae: morphology and molecules. — InRudall, P., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F., Humphries, C. J., (Eds): Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, pp. 443–460. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Beach, J. H., 1994: Flowering plant reproductive systems at La Selva Biological Station. — InMcDade, L. A., Bawa, K. S., Hespenheide, H., Hartshorn, G., (Eds): La Selva: ecology and natural history of a neotropical rain forest, pp. 161–182. — University of Chicago Press.

  • Schatz, G.E., Andrianifahanana, M., Morland, H. S., 1994: Pollination ofRavenala madagascariensis (Streliziaceae) by lemurs: evidence for an archaic coevolutionary system? — Amer. J. Bot.81: 542–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, T. H., 1980: Daily energy budget of free-living bats. — InWilson, D. E., Gardner, A. L., (Eds): Proceedings of the 5th International Bat Research Conference, pp. 369–392. — Lubbock: Texas Technical University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linhart, Y. B., 1973: Ecological and behavioral determinants of pollen dispersal in hummingbird pollinatedHeliconia. — Amer. Naturalist107: 511–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F. W., 1959: Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. — Stain Technol.34: 125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, D. C., 1986: Evolution of bird pollination in Australia. — InFord, H. A., Paton, D. C., (Eds): The dynamic partnership: Birds and plants in Southern Australia, pp. 32–41. — Adelaide: SA Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1989: Bills and tongues of nectar-feeding birds: a review of morphology, function and performance, with intercontinental comparisons. — Austral. J. Ecol.14: 473–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, M., Yeo, P., Lack, A., 1996: The natural history of pollination. — Portland: Timber Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, G. H., 1980: The foraging behaviour of Australian honeyeaters: a review and some comparisons with hummingbirds. — Austral. J. Ecol.5: 343–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, F. G., 1975: Ecology, flowering phenology and hummingbird pollination of some Costa RicanHeliconia species. — Ecology56: 285–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978: Ecological and evolutionary implications of bird pollination. — Amer. Zool.18: 715–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979: Notes on the natural history ofHeliconia (Musaceae) in Costa Rica. — Brenesia15: (Suppl.) 151–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsberg, G. E., 1980: Energy expenditure in free-living birds: patterns and diversity. — Acta XVII Congr. Int. Ornithol., pp. 300–305. — Berlin.

  • Weast, R. C., Astle, M. J., Beyer, W. H., 1984–1985: CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. 65th edn. — Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pedersen, L.B., Kress, W.J. Honeyeater (Meliphagidae) pollination and the floral biology of PolynesianHeliconia (Heliconiaceae). Pl Syst Evol 216, 1–21 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985098

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985098

Key words

Navigation