Skip to main content
Log in

Encainide—An updated safety profile

  • A Review of Encainide
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The safety of encainide has been evaluated using retrospective analyses of the Bristol-Myers Supraventricular and Ventricular Arrhythmias data base and of the Post-Marketing Adverse Experience Report data and prospective analyses of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST), the Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS), and the Ventricular Tachycardia/Heart Disease and Boston studies. CAST, a randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with a history of myocardial infarction with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias, showed that sudden death or nonfatal cardiac arrest occurred more frequently on encainide (24/418, 5.7%) than on placebo (7/416, 1.7%). The highest sudden death/cardiac arrest rates were found in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 0.30, those with a ventricular premature beat count of more than 50/hr and those with a myocardial infarction of more than 90 days. Similar sudden death/cardiac arrest rates were seen in the flecainide-treated group of the study but not in the moricizine-treated group. A retrospective analysis of the data collected from a similar cohort of patients in the Bristol-Myers data base showed a 1-year cumulative incidence of 10.2% in patients with a history of myocardial infarction. A retrospective analysis of mortality data in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias (301 patients) showed this to be slightly lower than in a matched sample of the general U.S. population. The sudden death mortality in the Ventricular Tachycardia/Heart Disease and Boston studies were similar to those reported with other antiarrhythmic agents. Abnormal laboratory findings caused four patients to be discontinued prematurely, but there have been no reported cases of any blood dyscrasias. Thus, there are currently no data showing that patients with symptomatic reentry supraventricular and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias are at increased risk with encainide therapy. Encainide should be reserved for those patients who are refractory or intolerant to other antiarrhythmic agents. Encainide is not indicated in patients with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias and structural heart disease. In patients without structural heart disease and symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias, the benefit and risks of encainide therapy should be carefully considered before it is prescribed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soyka LF. Safety of encainide for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:96C-103C.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Data on file at Bristol-Myers.

  3. CAST Investigators. Preliminary report: Effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1989;321:406–12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The CAPS Investigators. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS) Investigators. Effects of encainide, flecainide, imipramine and moricizine on ventricular arrhythmias during the year after acute myocardial infarction: The CAPS, Am J Cardiol 1988;61:501–509.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Encainide-Ventricular Tachycardia Study Group. Treatment of life-threatening ventricular tachycardia with encainide hydrochloride in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 1986;62:571–575.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tordjman TH, Podrid PJ, Reader E, Lown B. Safety and efficacy of encainide for malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:87C-95C.

    Google Scholar 

  8. US Post-Marketing Adverse Experiences Report. April 1987–October 18, 1988. Data on file at Bristol-Myers.

  9. Data on file at Bristol-Myers.

  10. DiBianco R, Fletcher RD, Cohen AI, et al. Treatment of frequent ventricular arrhythmia with encainide: Assessment using serial ambulatory electrocardiograms, intracardiac electrophysiologic studies, treadmill exercise tests and radionuclide cineangiographic studies. Circulation 1982;65: 1134–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sami M, Derbekyan VA, Lisbona R. Hemodynamic effects of encainide in patients with ventricular arrhythmia and poor ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 1983;52:507–511.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Salerno DM, Fifield J, Krejei J, et al. Encainide-induced hyperglycemia. Circulation 1986;74II:104.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Data on file at Bristol-Myers.

  14. Pentel PR, Goldsmith SR, Samerno DM, et al. Effect of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate in encainide overdose. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:878–879.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Data on file at Bristol-Myers.

  16. Hine LK, Laird NM, Hewitt P, Chalmers TC. Meta-analysis of empirical long-term antiarrhythmic therapy after myocardial infarction. JAMA 1989;262:3037–3040.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas GS. Death following withdrawal of encainide. N Engl J Med 1989;321:393.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garratt C, Ward DE, Camm AJ. Editorial: Lessons from the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial. Br Med J 1989; 299:805–806.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Editional: Flecainide and CAST. Lancet 1989;2:481–482.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomis, J.A. Encainide—An updated safety profile. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 4 (Suppl 3), 585–594 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357035

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357035

Key words

Navigation