Skip to main content
Log in

How to Identify At-Risk Medical Students Based on Learning Style, Personality Indicator, and Learning Strategy Tests—a Mixed Method for a Pilot Study

  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of students experiencing academic difficulty continues to be a prevalent and serious issue among medical schools worldwide. While some studies have investigated the causes of underperformance, none have identified markers of “at-risk” students. This study used three diagnostic tests to determine possible identifying characteristics of students performing at different levels. Our results indicate that students with a diverging learning style may struggle in medical school and need to be guided toward a learning style that is more suitable to their career paths. Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) reveals that low-performing students need assistance honing their test-taking and self-assessment skills. This test can be a good complement to the Kolb Learning Style Inventory (LSI). In order to promote the academic success of medical students, adequate diagnostic tests should be utilized upon the students’ matriculation to assist in finding their learning styles, strengths, and weaknesses. Thereafter, a combination of study skills, test-taking strategies, and time management learning tools should be provided to those identified to be “at risk” academically, in order to increase their chances of success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mcloughlin CS. Characteristics of students failing medical education: an essay of reflections. Med Educ Online [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2012 May 30]; 14:1–6. Available from: http://www.med-ed-online.org/pdf/L0000029.pdf

  2. Paul G, Hinman G, Dottl S, Passon J (2009) Academic development: a survey of academic difficulties experienced by medical students and support services provided. Teach Learn Med 21(3):254–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cleland J, Arnold R, Chesser A (2005) Failing finals is often a surprise for the student but not the teacher: identifying difficulties and supporting students with academic difficulties. Med Teach 27(6):504–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sayer M, Chaput De Saintonge M, Evans D, Wood D (2002) Support for students with academic difficulties. Med Educ 36(7):643–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mcgrath B, Mcquail D (2004) Decelerated medical education. Med Teach 26(6):510–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kies SM, Freund GG (2005) Medical students who decompress during the M-1year outperform those who fail and repeat it: a study of M-1 students at the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Urbana-Champaign 1988–2000. BMC Med Educ 5:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chur-Hansen A, Vernon-Roberts J (1998) Clinical teachers’ perceptions of medical students’ English language proficiency. Med Educ 32(4):351–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Clercq L, Pearson SA, Rolfe IE (2001) The relationship between previous tertiary education and course performance in first year medical students at Newcastle University. Aust Educ Health 14(3):417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murdoch-Eaton D, Pell G, Roberts T (2007) Changing approach to undergraduate studies documented during annual appraisal of medical students. Med Teach 29(2–3):111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ross S, Cleland J, Macleod MJ (2006) Stress, debt and undergraduate medical student performance. Med Educ 40(6):584–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bess TL, Harvey RJ (2002) Bimodal score distributions and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: fact or artifact? J Pers Assess 78(1):176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Capraro RM, Capraro MM (2002) Myers-Briggs Type Indicator score reliability across studies: a meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educ Psychol Meas 62(4):590–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy RB, Kennedy DA (2004) Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in career counseling. J Employ Couns 41(1):38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lepine JA, Colquitt JA, Erez A (2000) Adaptability to changing task contexts: effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Pers Psychol 53(3):563–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory—version 3.1 2005 technical specifications [Internet]. Hay Resources Direct; 2005 May 15 [cited 2012 Apr 13]. Available from: http://www.whitewater-rescue.com/support/pagepics/lsitechmanual.pdf

  16. H&H Publishing. Scales of LASSI [Internet]. Clearwater (FL): H&H Publishing; 2012. [cited 2012 May 25]. Available from: http://www.hhpublishing.com/_assessments/LASSI/scales.html

  17. The Myers & Briggs Foundation. MBTI basics [Internet]. Gainesville (FL): The Myers & Briggs Foundation; 2012. [cited 2012 May 23]. Available from: http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/mbti-basics/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amina Sadik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sadik, A., Rojas, L. How to Identify At-Risk Medical Students Based on Learning Style, Personality Indicator, and Learning Strategy Tests—a Mixed Method for a Pilot Study. Med.Sci.Educ. 24, 111–115 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-014-0016-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-014-0016-3

Keywords

Navigation