Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Corpus callosum involvement and postoperative outcomes of patients with gliomas

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corpus callosum involvement is associated with poorer survival in high grade glioma (HGG), but the prognostic value in low grade glioma (LGG) is unclear. To determine the prognostic impact of corpus callosum involvement on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in HGG and LGG, the records of 233 glioma patients treated from 2008 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images were used to identify corpus callosum involvement. Age, sex, preoperative Karnofsky performance scale, postoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score and extent of resection (EOR) were evaluated with respect to PFS and OS. The incidence of corpus callosum involvement was similar among HGG (14 %) and LGG (14.5 %). Univariate analysis revealed that PFS and OS were significantly shorter in both WHO grade II and grade IV glioma with corpus callosum involvement (both, p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that grade II glioma with corpus callosum involvement have shorter PFS (p = 0.03), while EOR, instead of corpus callosum involvement (p = 0.16), was an independent factor associated with PFS in grade IV glioma (p < 0.05). Corpus callosum involvement was no longer significantly associated with OS after adjusting age, gender, EOR, preoperative and postoperative performance status (p = 0.16, 0.17 and 0.56 in grade II, III and IV gliomas, respectively). Corpus callosum involvement happened in both LGG and HGG, and is associated with lower EOR and higher postoperative ECOG score both in LGG and HGG. Corpus callosum involvement tends to be an independent prognostic factor for PFS in LGG, but not for OS in LGG or in HGG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bureau of Health Promotion, Department of Health. (2013) Cancer Registry Annual Report, 2010, Taiwan. Bureau of Health Promotion, Taipei

    Google Scholar 

  2. Porter KR, McCarthy BJ, Freels S, Kim Y, Davis FG (2010) Prevalence estimates for primary brain tumors in the United States by age, gender, behavior, and histology. Neuro Oncol 12:520–527

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwartzbaum JA, Fisher JL, Aldape KD, Wrensh M (2006) Epidemiology and molecular pathology of glioma. Nat Clin Pract Neuro 2:494–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States [http://www.CBTRUS.org]

  5. Sanai N, Polley MY, McDermott MW, Parsa AT, Berger MS (2011) An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas. J Neurosurg 115:3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang YC, Wei KC, Chang CH et al (2011) A retrospective survey of patients with malignant gliomas treated in the neuro-oncological care system under the universal national health insurance program in Taiwan. J Clin Neurosci 18:784–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Agrawal A (2009) Butterfly glioma of the corpus callosum. J Cancer Res Ther 5:43–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rees JH, Smirniotopoulos JG, Jones RV, Wong K (1996) Glioblastoma multiforme: radiologic–pathologic correlation. Radiographics 16:1413–1438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bourekas EC, Varakis K, Bruns D et al (2002) Lesions of the corpus callosum: MR imaging and differential considerations in adults and children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:251–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Renard D, Castelnovo G, Campello C et al (2014) An MRI review of acquired corpus callosum lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 85:1041–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Monaco EA 3rd, Armah HB, Nikiforova MN, Hamilton RL, Engh JA (2011) Grade II oligodendroglioma localized to the corpus callosum. Brain Tumor Pathol 28:305–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Steltzer KJ, Sauvé KI, Spence AM, Griffin TW, Berger MS (1997) Corpus callosum involvement as a prognostic factor for patiens with high-grade astrocytoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38:27–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dziurzynski K, Blas-Boria D, Suki D et al (2012) Butterfly glioblastomas: a retrospective review and qualitative assessment of outcomes. J Neurooncol 109:555–563

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Allahdini F, Amirjamshidi A, Reza-Zarei M, Abdollahi M (2009) Evaluating the prognostic factors effective on the outcome of patients with glioblastoma multiformis: dose maximal resection of the tumor lengthen the median survival? World Neurosurg 73:128–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD et al (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114:97–109

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR et al (2001) A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 95:190–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanai N, Berger MS (2008) Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery 62:753–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith JS, Chang EF, Lamborn KR et al (2008) Role of extent of resection in the long-term outcome of low-grade hemispheric gliomas. J Clin Oncol 26:1338–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gil-Perotin S, Marin-Husstege M, Li J et al (2006) Loss of p53 induces changes in the behavior of subventricular zone cells: implication for the genesis of glial tumors. J Neurosci 26:1107–1116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanai N, Alvarez-Buylla A, Berger MS (2005) Neural stem cells and the origin of gliomas. N Engl J Med 353:811–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chaichana K, Parker S, Olivi A, Quinones-Hinojosa A (2010) A proposed classification system that projects outcomes based on preoperative variables for adult patients with glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurosurg 112:997–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jafri NF, Clarke JL, Weinberg V, Barani IJ, Cha S (2013) Relationship of glioblastoma multiforme to the subevntricular zone is associated with survival. Neuro Oncol 15:91–96

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kellenberg K, Goldmann T, Menke J et al (2013) Glioma infiltration of the corpus callosum: early signs detected by DTI. J Neurooncol 112:217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bent MJ, Wefel JS, Schiff D et al (2011) Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas. Lancet Oncol 12:583–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Cancer Center. This work was supported by the Grants from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Nos. CMRPG3D0241, CORPG3C0041) and Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Nos. 102-2334-B-182A-068-MY3, 104-2325-B-182-001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pin-Yuan Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, KT., Wu, TW.E., Chuang, CC. et al. Corpus callosum involvement and postoperative outcomes of patients with gliomas. J Neurooncol 124, 207–214 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1823-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1823-0

Keywords

Navigation