Skip to main content
Log in

Directors’ human capital, firm strategy, and firm performance

  • Published:
Journal of Management & Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ideally, corporations are directed by boards whose directors provide valuable human capital that match the firms’ strategy. We investigate how directors’ human capital (international experience, industrial know-how, CEO experience, and financial know-how) affects firm performance including the firm’s strategy (diversification and internationalization) and how human capital is related to acquisition strategies (non-diversifying and international acquisitions). Our sample consists of 560 firm-year observations in Switzerland. We find empirical evidence that directors’ human capital affects firm performance and that this relationship depends on the firm’s strategy. Furthermore, human capital is also correlated with acquisition strategy. The study shows that focusing on board independence and compliance issues may be unrewarding in board research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The question of personal profile needs also to be addressed, because the performance benefits from career specifics are not directly correlated with director independence or their demographics. As an illustration, the management researchers Hillman et al. (2002) show that "community influentials" are more likely to be females or African-American. Similarly, sociologists Zeng and Xie (2004) find evidence that US employees educated abroad earn less than Americans or foreigners educated in the United States. These two examples demonstrate that the omission of certain attributes, such as skill and experience, may cause problems when assessing the aptitude of various profiles for specific posts.

  2. Similarly, Hillman et al. (2000) classify board members skill-wise into three categories with specific board roles. The first group, "business experts" have executive experience as CEOs or as officers of large corporations. The second group, "support specialists" provides particular services to the boards; e.g., legal advise or financial expertise. And the final category includes politicians and university professors. This group has no specialized business background, but influences society and opinion-making. Such directors are denominated "community influentials" (Baysinger and Butler 1985 apply similar classifications).

  3. Krause et al. (2013) demarcate the service role of boards which is characterized by providing advice and expertise from the resource dependence role where solely external links to the firm’s environment are crucial. We follow, e.g., Hillman and Dalziel (2003) who see both roles as being part of the resource dependence theory.

  4. The market value of equity is calculated as the average share price 5 days before and 5 days after the last trading day of the year multiplied by the number of outstanding shares. Notably, the study uses all classes of equity, including non-listed equity. The market value of non-listed equity is estimated according to the firm’s listed stock price adjusted for different face values as stipulated by the Swiss tax authorities.

  5. The complete sample is corrected for outliers in Tobin’s Q (and Sales growth) with winsorization at the 5 % level in each tail (95 and 5 ‰) on the year level (and industry level).

  6. We collected data for Tobin’s Q in 2004, 2006, 2008, and 2010. 23 values of lagged (19) and leaded (4) Tobin’s Q are not available which reduces our sample to 537 firm-year observations.

References

  • Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2008). Do directors perform for pay? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(1), 154–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, R. K., & Samwick, A. A. (2003). Why do managers diversify their firms? Agency reconsidered. Journal of Finance, 58(1), 71–118.  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (2001). Do some outside directors play a political role? Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 179–198.

  • Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. The Bell Journal of Economics, 12(2), 605–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. (1999). Does corporate ownership structure affect its strategy towards diversification? Strategic Management Journal20(11), 1063–1069.

  • Anderson, R. C., Bates, T. W., Bizjak, J. M., & Lemmon, M. L. (2000). Corporate governance and firm diversification. Financial Management, 29(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Reeb, D. M., Upadhyay, A., & Zhao, W. (2011). The economics of director heterogeneity. Financial Management, 40(1), 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassiou, N., & Nigh, D. (2002). The impact of the top management team’s international business experience on the firm’s internationalization: Social networks at work. Management International Review, 42(2), 157–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barroso, C., Villegas, M. M., & Pérez-Calero, L. (2011). Board influence on a firm’s internationalization. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. N. (1985). Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 1(1), 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baysinger, B. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1990). The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 72–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamish, P. W., Dacosta, R. C., & Geringer, J. M. (1989). Diversification strategy and internationalization: Implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(2), 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1964). Human capital. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. G., & Ofek, E. (1995). Diversification’s effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1), 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, B. S., & Khanna, V. S. (2007). Can corporate governance reforms increase firm market values? Event study evidence from India. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(4), 749–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, M. (2011). An economic perspective on the notion of human capital. In A. Burton-Jones & J. C. Spender (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of human capital (pp. 49–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, A. L., Field, L. C., Karpoff, J. M., & Raheja, C. G. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 66–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, L. L., Conley, J. M., & Krawiec, K. D. (2010). Dangerous categories: Narratives of corporate board diversity. NCL Review, 89, 759–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, D. T., & Mizruchi, M. S. (2005). Bankers on the board and the debt ratio of firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 129–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Y., & Sevilir, M. (2012). Board connections and M&A transactions. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(2), 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrò, A., & Mussolino, D. (2013). How do boards of directors contribute to family SME export intensity? The role of formal and informal governance mechanisms. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(2), 363–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. A., Coff, R. W., & Kryscynski, D. (2012). Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Academy of Management Review, 37, 376–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K., & Vera, A. M. (2010). Female board appointments and firm valuation: Short and long-term effects. Journal of Management and Governance, 14(1), 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., Pollock, T. G., & Leary, M. M. (2003). Testing a model of reasoned risk-taking: Governance, the experience of principals and agents, and global strategy in high-technology IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24(9), 803–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., Sanders, W. G., & Gregersen, H. B. (2001). Bundling human capital with organizational context: The impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerrato, D., & Piva, M. (2012). The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of family management, human capital and foreign ownership. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(4), 617–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certo, S. T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 432–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R., Dyball, M. C., & Wright, S. (2009). The link between board composition and corporate diversification in Australian corporations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(2), 208–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhaochharia, V., & Grinstein, Y. (2007). The changing structure of U.S. corporate boards: 1997–2003. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1215–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, A. P., & Marcel, J. J. (2011). Damaged goods: Board decisions to dismiss reputationally compromised directors. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 509–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, D. R. (2000). International experience in the executive suite: The path to prosperity? Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 515–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalziel, T., Gentry, R. J., & Bowerman, M. (2011). An integrated agency—Resource dependence view of the influence of directors’ human and relational capital on firms’ R&D spending. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1217–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dass, N., Kini, O., Nanda, V., Onal, B., & Wang, J. (2014). Board expertise: Do directors from related industries help bridge the information gap? Review of Financial Studies, 27(5), 1533–1592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFond, M. L., Hann, R. N., & Hu, X. (2005). Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), 153–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (1999). Geographic scope, product diversification, and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20(8), 711–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demb, A., & Neubauer, F. (1992). The corporate board: Confronting the paradoxes. Long Range Planning, 25(3), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Y. (2005). The impact of board composition on firms’ critical decisions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 31(3), 424–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmann, I., Maug, E. G., & Schneider, C. (2010). Bankers on the boards of German firms: What they do, what they are worth, and why they are (still) there. Review of Finance, 14(1), 35–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drobetz, W., Von Meyerinck, Oesch, D., & Schmid, M. (2014). Is board industry experience a corporate governance mechanism? University of St.Gallen, School of Finance Research Paper No. 2014/01.

  • Dunn, P. (2012). Breaking the boardroom gender barrier: The human capital of female corporate directors. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(4), 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckbo, B. E. (1983). Horizontal mergers, collusion, and stockholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1), 241–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahlenbrach, R., Low, A., & Stulz, R. M. (2010). Why do firms appoint CEOs as outside directors? Journal of Financial Economics, 97(1), 12–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahlenbrach, R., Minton, B. A., & Pan, C. H. (2011). Former CEO directors: Lingering CEOs or valuable resources? Review of Financial Studies, 24(10), 3486–3518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faleye, O. (2007). Does one hat fit all? The case of corporate leadership structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 11(3), 239–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faleye, O., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2013). Industry expertise on corporate boards. Northeastern U. D’Amore-McKim School of Business Research Paper No. 2013-04.

  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, K., & Hersch, P. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1), 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, S. P., Kim, K. A., & Kitsabunnarat, P. (2003). The costs (and benefits?) of diversified business groups: The case of Korean chaebols. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(2), 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fich, E. M. (2005). Are some outside directors better than others? Evidence from director appointments by Fortune 1000 firms. The Journal of Business, 78(5), 1943–1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, G., Wiklund, J., & Zahra, S. A. (2005). Ownership and the internationalization of small firms. Journal of Management, 31(2), 210–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güner, A. B., Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Financial expertise of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2), 323–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagendorff, J., & Keasey, K. (2012). The value of board diversity in banking: Evidence from the market for corporate control. The European Journal of Finance, 18(1), 41–58.

  • Hambrick, D. C., Werder, A., & Zajac, E. J. (2008). New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science, 19(3), 381–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidrick & Struggles (2011). Challenging board performance: European corporate governance report 2011. Paris: Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.

  • Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2005). Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. The Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Nicholson, G., & Shropshire, C. (2008). Directors’ multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision. Organization Science, 19(3), 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobdari, B., Gregoric, A., & Sinani, E. (2011). The role of firm ownership on internationalization: Evidence from two transition economies. Journal of Management and Governance, 15(3), 393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanjean, T., & Stolowy, H. (2009). Determinants of board members’ financial expertise—Empirical evidence from France. The International Journal of Accounting, 44(4), 378–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2004). Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 507–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S., & Pye, A. (2014). Interlocking directorships and firm performance in highly regulated sectors: The moderating impact of board diversity. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(2), 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarek, S., & Ruigrok, W. (2013). In at the deep end of firm internationalization. Management International Review, 53(4), 513–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, P., Jones, C. D., & Boivie, S. (2014). Director human capital, information processing demands, and board effectiveness. Journal of Management, 40(2), 557–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Lim, C. (2010). Diversity, outside directors and firm valuation: Korean evidence. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 284–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Masulis, R. W. (2013). The supply of corporate directors and board independence. Review of Financial Studies, 26(6), 1561–1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. Y., & Leblebici, H. (2005). How do interdependencies among human-capital deployment, development, and diversification strategies affect firms’ financial performance? Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 967–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. Y., & Misangyi, V. F. (2008). Outside directors’ industry-specific experience and firms’ liability of newness. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1345–1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. Y., & Sundaramurthy, C. (2009). Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of Management, 35(4), 981–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2001). Corporate Governance in der Schweiz: Verwaltungsrat—zwischen Verantwortung und Haftung. Zürich: KPMG Fides Management AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, R., Semadeni, M., & Cannella, A. A. (2013). External COO/presidents as expert directors: A new look at the service role of boards. Strategic Management Journal, 34(13), 1628–1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, M., Walters, B. A., & Wright, P. (2008). Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroszner, R. S., & Strahan, P. E. (2001). Bankers on boards: Monitoring, conflicts of interest, and lender liability. Journal of Financial Economics, 62(3), 415–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. The Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajili, K. (2014). Embedding human capital into governance design: A conceptual framework. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(3), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, L. H., & Stulz, R. M. (1994). Tobin’s q, corporate diversification, and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1248–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehn, K. M., Patro, S., & Zhao, M. (2009). Determinants of the size and composition of US corporate boards: 1935–2000. Financial Management, 38(4), 747–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen, W. G. (1971). A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger. The Journal of Finance, 26(2), 521–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2008). The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 308–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2009). The effects and unintended consequences of the Sarbanes–Oxley act on the supply and demand for directors. Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3287–3328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorsch, J. W., & MacIver, E. (1989). Pawns or potentates: The reality of America’s corporate boards. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661–2700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markarian, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2007). Firm complexity and board of director composition. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1224–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masulis, R. W., Ruzzier, C. A., Xiao, S., & Zhao, S. (2013). Do independent expert directors matter? Working Paper, University of New South Wales.

  • Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2012). Globalizing the boardroom—The effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), 527–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. L., Westphal, J. D., & Graebner, M. E. (2008). What do they know? The effects of outside director acquisition experience on firm acquisition performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11), 1155–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlfeld, K., Rao Sahib, P., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2012). A contextual theory of organizational learning from failures and successes: A study of acquisition completion in the global newspaper industry, 1981–2008. Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 938–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, S. (2010). Top management team internationalization and firm performance. Management International Review, 50(2), 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg, A. J., Moliterno, T. P., Hale, D., Hale, D., & Lepak, D. P. (2014). Resource-based perspective on unit-level human capital: A review and integration. Journal of Management, 40(1), 316–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxelheim, L., Gregoric, A., Randoy, T., & Thomsen, S. (2013). On the internationalization of corporate boards: The case of Nordic firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(3), 173–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxelheim, L., & Randoy, T. (2003). The impact of foreign board membership on firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(12), 2369–2392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. A., & Philpot, J. (2007). Women’s roles on US Fortune 500 boards: Director expertise and committee memberships. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(2), 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1972). Merger as a response to organizational interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 382–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P.-J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 292–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, A., & Wenstøp, P. Z. (2007). Board members’ contribution to strategic decision-making in small firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 11(4), 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, C. D. (1995). Did JP Morgan’s men add liquidity? Corporate investment, cash flow, and financial structure at the turn of the twentieth century. Journal of Finance, 50(2), 661–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 59(2), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. G., & Carpenter, M. A. (1998). Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 158–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1989). Management entrenchment: The case of manager-specific investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26(1), 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer Stuart (2013). Spencer Stuart board index (28th ed.). Downloaded from www.spencerstuart.com.

  • Stein, J. (1997). Internal capital markets and competition for corporate resources. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, W. B., & Radin, R. F. (2009). Social capital and social influence on the board of directors. Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), 16–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, P., & Taylor, B. (1996). The strategic role of the board. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 4(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, J. J., Haleblian, J. J., & Rajagopalan, N. (2011). The effects of board human and social capital on investor reactions to new CEO selection. Strategic Management Journal, 32(7), 731–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2000). Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1157–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berghe, L. A., & Levrau, A. (2004). Evaluating boards of directors: What constitutes a good corporate board? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 461–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, B. A., Kroll, M., & Wright, P. (2008). Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48(4), 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withers, M. C., Hillman, A. J., & Cannella, A. A. (2012). A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 243–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Z., & Xie, Y. (2004). Asian Americans’ earnings disadvantage reexamined: The role of place of education. The American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), 1075–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the research grant by the Förderverein WWZ (B-119). We thank three anonymous referees for their helpful comments and Hermione Miller-Moser for her editorial assistance. This paper is based on Chapter 6 of the Ph.D thesis by Christophe Volonté: “Corporate Governance in Switzerland”, University of Basel, 2011. Christophe Volonté thanks the University of Manchester for providing him with access to BoardEx during his research stay at the Manchester Business School.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Volonté.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volonté, C., Gantenbein, P. Directors’ human capital, firm strategy, and firm performance. J Manag Gov 20, 115–145 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-014-9304-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-014-9304-y

Keywords

Navigation